Whenever a game is being described by its fans or creator as “art”, it’s a white flag that there’s going to be trouble and controversy ahead. For as much as has been made about the ‘are video games art?’ question in the past, the fact remains that most people – even most gamers – don’t deploy the A-word about a title unless someone’s offended about the content or at the very least irritated by the execution. The moment I saw the fine folks at Kotaku referring to Proteus as “the lastest art piece”, I had a feeling that this wouldn’t be the easiest game to review – and quite possibly a chore to play. So the important question to ask is: is this one of those “art” games that actually manages to be worth its asking price (in this case, $9.99 at the Steam store)? Or is this just a case of someone phoning in a lazy game with some modest content to speak of and hoping no one sees through the whole “the beauty is in its simplicity” routine?
First, let’s deal with the all too obvious: Proteus is a very simplistic game in terms of both graphics and sound. And when I say simple, I mean we’re talking about graphical simplicity on the order of the original Atari 2600 Pitfall! game. The sounds are barely that much better, being a mix of barely tonal musical hums and various pitches of blips, boops and other simple onomatopoeia. I don’t say this to bash Proteus, because frankly, I can endure some incredibly simplistic graphics in a game – right on down to relatively bare text and ASCII imitations of tilesets – so long as I can understand what’s going on, and the game’s mechanics follow through with the fun and performance. It’s a niche position to be in nowadays when beautiful graphics are practically becoming a standard for even free-to-play indie games, but it’s the perspective I come from. I also know it’s not a perspective everyone shares, so take this as a warning – if you can’t endure extremely blocky, simple (if smoothly animated) graphics, skip Proteus straightaway. You’ll be clawing at your eyes from the intro screen alone.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with a game that’s built first and foremost around exploration – even exploration to the exclusion of all else. There were times in Proteus where I stumbled upon some very pleasant sights, ones that caught me by surprise. Those were times where I found myself warming to the concept of the game, after initially being put off by the abstractness and seeming lack of direction of it all. But just when I started to really want to see more in Proteus, to seek out and stumble upon even more surprises, a realization started to sink in for me: those moments of satisfaction at finding something new and strange are just too few and far between. I spent a good hour walking up over hills, struggling my way up mountains, following paths… and usually, there just wasn’t much of an experiential payoff.
I could be missing things. Maybe I’m not digging deep enough, maybe there’s a system I simply haven’t figured out. But this is where things get complicated as far as reviewing goes – does the fault lie with me for simply not pushing and exploring as thoroughly as I should? Do I not have the patience that this game reasonably is asking for? Or is the game simply not delivering on the responsibility of being an engaging title? I’m sure a question like that could be debated back and forth for ages, but right now, I’m going to lay the blame on Proteus rather than myself. Call it a game that took a risk that didn’t pay off, or at least didn’t pay off for me, and I think won’t pay off for most people who give it a shot.
That’s not to say Proteus isn’t a bad game, or not worth experiencing at all – it simply is stingy with the moments of exploration that would justify itself. The graphics and sound, while simple, is still somewhat endearing. The fact that it generates a new island each time you load it up is a decent touch. The ability to share particular islands with friends via a screenshot “postcard” is inventive – even if I have trouble imagining most people taking advantage of it. If it were cheaper, if there were more to it, it would justify its $9.99 asking price. As it stands now, however, most people would probably be better off holding onto their money and looking elsewhere to satisfy their exploration fix.