July 30, 2016, 10:39:53 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
 on: July 25, 2016, 02:37:15 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by farley2k
zip, zero, nut'in

 on: July 25, 2016, 02:18:07 PM 
Started by naednek - Last post by leo8877
This is great Ken. Hope he has a great day.

 on: July 25, 2016, 02:08:36 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by Bullwinkle

Quote from: EddieA on July 25, 2016, 02:01:31 PM

Reviews for Headlander look pretty good.

Yeah, the outlier seems to be Destructoid.  They often line up with my own opinions, so I usually give them a little more weight, but reading the review, it looks like he was looking for something the game was never going to deliver (he goes on and on about lack of depth in the story for a game about a detached, flying head in a 70s sci fi world).

 on: July 25, 2016, 02:08:10 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by Soulchilde

 on: July 25, 2016, 02:01:31 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by EddieA
Reviews for Headlander look pretty good.

 on: July 25, 2016, 01:37:11 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by YellowKing
Yeah same. I would be all over this at a reasonable price, but for that amount of money I'd expect a full HD makeover plus bonus content.

 on: July 25, 2016, 01:34:23 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by msteelers

Quote from: Harkonis on July 15, 2016, 02:04:44 AM

If by lame you mean incredibly awesome! slywink

$2 for each of those games isn't bad at all imo.

This. The wife and I will be purchasing this plus a second controller as soon as it comes out. The only thing it's missing is Duck Hunt.

 on: July 25, 2016, 01:30:51 PM 
Started by EngineNo9 - Last post by msteelers
I absolutely loved Ultimate Alliance 1 and 2 back in the day, but there is no chance I'm paying that much money to play them again.

 on: July 25, 2016, 01:27:03 PM 
Started by Ridah - Last post by pr0ner

Quote from: Andrew Wonser on July 24, 2016, 11:08:34 PM

I really hope they do not decide to be greedy. But who am I kidding this is a patent. It reads like those other patents that wouldn't normally get approved except they put "on a computer" in it. That's disregarding the fact that it's math to begin with.

Patent law says you cannot patent a formula, but you can patent an application of that formula.  What's the problem here?

 on: July 25, 2016, 11:54:06 AM 
Started by Greg Wak - Last post by TheAtomicKid
So, how goes the war? You get all the drivers banged into shape?


Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 17 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.041s, 1q)