http://gamingtrend.com
April 16, 2014, 07:11:51 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 [61] 62 63 ... 74
2401  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Farcry Instincts, anyone? on: February 02, 2006, 08:54:12 AM
Quote
The gaming trend reviewer was obviously enjoying the game Wink


Yup.  I loved it.  Even made my best of the year list at #2 (Psychonauts was #1)
2402  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / What? No Porn Worm discussion? on: February 01, 2006, 06:44:04 PM
Yup.  that's why I do all of that stuff on my mac biggrin
2403  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Need a background... on: January 31, 2006, 08:13:20 PM
Looks like this one was made for you, KD:

http://interfacelift.com/wallpaper/details.php?id=27
2404  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Microsoft thinking about getting into the handheld business? on: January 27, 2006, 04:17:04 AM
uh, duh....  it'll be the xPod
2405  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Disney to acquire Pixar? on: January 24, 2006, 06:04:47 PM
I interpeted it as John Lasseter taking over the entire Disney Animation dept.  Disney does other stuff, too, y'know?

Now, I'm speculating here, but what if Lasseter put Brad Bird in charge of re-forming and revitalizing the 2d dept?  THAT WOULD RULE.
2406  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Disney to acquire Pixar? on: January 24, 2006, 02:16:22 PM
Bah!  I didn't think that thread was getting enough love.  The subject title was  not as direct.

Besides, I'm excited about this news and the quote from the new article warms my heart. biggrin
2407  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Disney to acquire Pixar? on: January 24, 2006, 08:17:15 AM
Read it here.

But wait, Disney=bad, right?  Well, now that Eisner is gone we may see some positive change, and if this happens, well:

Quote
Several crucial details were still being hammered out Monday, including the employment contracts for certain Pixar executives, among them John Lasseter, Pixar's chief creative officer and a former animator at Disney, one person said. He is expected to oversee the animation unit that would become part of Disney's filmed animation division.


Let me just say that this= fuck yes!  This would assuredly usher in a new golden age for Disney animation.  And Steve Jobs on the board of directors?  unibrow
2408  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / What country will Bush attack next? [RP] on: January 23, 2006, 06:34:45 PM
Quote
Do you think all this rhetoric he and his regime have been spewing against countries like Iran and North Korea are just for fun and game? He's building it all up for something, and I think it's got a lot more to do than just sanctions.


See, that's the thing, there is tons of rhetoric. In fact, both Iran and North Korea are tossing around several times more rhetoric than the Bush admin is.  Does that make them more likely to attack?  Not really.  I would be more worried if we heard nothing coming out of those countries.

I would say that a 'pre-emptive' strike against any country is just not going to happen at this point.  Look, I think Bush is a fuck-up myself, but to think that he's just sitting around the white house going "hmnnn, I only have two more years left- I must attack someone before I get out!" is pretty juvenile.
2409  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / GameCrazy Sale on: January 22, 2006, 11:03:16 PM
I have had consistently good experiences with the GameCrazy near me.  Better prices on recent releases, better trade-in values, better customer service.

Wish I had the scratch to pick up Burnout frown
2410  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / How many dead pixels is too much? on: January 22, 2006, 07:14:13 AM
I'd go ahead and try and take it back.  it's worth a shot
2411  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / This just in! Jessica Simpson Likes her Tatas! on: January 21, 2006, 05:11:09 PM
or this:

2412  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Underworld Reviews on: January 21, 2006, 02:52:59 AM
Ah biggrin  Well, yeah, I guess I was guilty of the same thing.  Someone had to crack a joke...
2413  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Underworld Reviews on: January 21, 2006, 12:49:19 AM
Quote
I was constantly pulled out of it, which is when the smart-ass peanut gallery one-liners pop out.


That's really odd, because one of the main things I didn't like about the first one was that I thought it was totally humorless, not even any one-liners.  Now, maybe it was just because the lines were delivered with so much angst and severity that I missed this, but I thought it couldv'e taken itself a touch less seriously.  Every character was the same: moody.  It desperately needed a counterpoint.
2414  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Come see the Stones of Shatner on: January 20, 2006, 11:46:26 PM
Quote
Push come to shove...


heheheheh.....
2415  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 08:54:51 PM
2416  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 08:30:13 PM
Your hypocrisy ASTOUNDS me.
2417  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 01:36:12 PM
You just can't get over this "if I'm not with you, I'm against you" attitude, can you?
2418  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Of Mice and Lamps on: January 20, 2006, 05:38:51 AM
Quote from: "disarm"
Quote from: "unbreakable"
Pixar is such a cash-cow, I think they would be incredibly foolish to be folded into another company.

But hey, maybe Jobs needs the money.

i find it interesting that the proposed payment in form of stocks would make Jobs the single largest shareholder in Disney.  i'd say that should still give him a little leverage as to what happens with Pixar...


Hell, if that put Jobs in any kind of leadership role at Disney, he'd probably hand the keys over to John Lasster who would usher in a new Golden Age for the company.

That, actually, excites the hell out of me.
2419  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 05:35:18 AM
Autistic Angel, you misunderstand me.  I am angry at BOTH political parties.  I'm not saying you should only be angry at one or the other, I think both parties are self serving and interested only in continuing their own power as opposed to what they should be interested in, and that is serving the American people.

It's this one or the other or nothing at all attitude that irritates the hell out of me.  We need more options but the tools in power on both sides of the fence won't let that happen.
2420  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / The End of AD on: January 20, 2006, 04:08:29 AM
Dude, it got BETTER in season 2

Season 3, in many ways, got even better that that.
2421  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 02:30:34 AM
Oh, don't get me wrong, I don't think a third party will magically make everything right, I just think we deserve an alternative to what we have now.  It would be a step in the right direction.
2422  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 02:09:23 AM
Quote from: "unbreakable"

Quote
Wait. So those abuses of power that the Clinton admin so graciously help put in place only work if an administration works inside the law? That doesn't make ANY sense.

Im sorry, you appear to be operating under the assumption that you have proven any such abuses of power.


Sorry, that came out garbled.  What I meant to say is that the policies against abuses of power that the Clinton admin so graciously help put in place only work if an administration works inside the law? That doesn't make ANY sense.

Just so we are clear, that was in response to this:

Quote
So, in a case which was no less important than our current situation, the Clinton administration worked within the law, and THEN addressed a point of potential abuse, creating MORE, rather than less, oversight of the executive branch.


Frankly, I have no desire to defend either political party.  I despise them both.  I feel the two party system has made a mockery of our political system for far too long.
2423  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 01:32:33 AM
Enough of this tit for tat.  I'll exit on this note:  If Gore was half as altruistic and determined to make a change to what is going on right now as you think he is, he would be calling out his old buddies in the Democratic party on how ineffectual they are in addressing these issues and providing a more compelling alternative to the American people than John Kerry and the rest of the high level members of the DNC.  I think they are just playing it safe because they know the more GW fucks up this term the better chance they have of getting their own scumbag in office in 08.  At the rate things are going they are pretty much guaranteed a win if they have a candidate with even a modicum of charisma.

Good cop/bad cop.
2424  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 01:17:33 AM
Quote
Sure. The current president is purposely operating outside the law.

That was, I thought, the entire reason for Gore's speech. Which you claim to have read.


Wait.  So those abuses of power that the Clinton admin so graciously help put in place only work if an administration works inside the law?  That doesn't make ANY sense.
2425  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 01:13:05 AM
Quote
By contrast, what were the huge scandals rocking Democratic administrations? Blow-job-gate?


you can't be serious, can you?  Don't you realize that the democrats are just better at covering things up than the republicans?  Half of their big 'boo-boos' come out after they are gone from office, usually, and as we all know, America's attention span doesn't extend that far.

What about Bill Clinton and Whitewater? Selling Military Technology to the Chinese? If you are going to bring up Enron (and you should), didn't Worldcom contribute heavily to the democratic party with some of their ill-gotten gain?  Of course, corporate scandal is corporate scandal, I don't attribute Enron's shadiness to Bush or his administration.  Besides, Bush is digging his own grave well enough without that being a mark against him.

The Bush administration is arrogant and sloppy, and they are getting caught at a lot of shit.  That doesn't mean that the Democrat's shit doesn't stink, however.
2426  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 12:39:32 AM
Quote
So, in a case which was no less important than our current situation, the Clinton administration worked within the law, and THEN addressed a point of potential abuse, creating MORE, rather than less, oversight of the executive branch.


So why the fuck are we in this position, huh?  Doesn't it concern you that their steps to correct that potential abuse turned out to be so ineffectual?
2427  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 12:29:20 AM
Quote
The issue with the Bush administration is a PATTERN of avoiding any form of oversight. Hey, if you are down with that, admit that you believe the Consitution is an outdated goddamn piece of paper, and that the US needs an authoritarian police state to deal with "terrorists", who are killing far less Americans than, say, depressive suicides, or auto accidents, or heart disease.

We were fighting two wars, one against genocidal Nazis, and we werent forced to appoint a dictator to run the show. This war of choice in Iraq is far less a dire situation; so why, then, are more draconian measures REQUIRED to deal with it?


No, I am not down with that.  I just don't think putting a democrat in the office is going to change anything significantly.  Issues like this will be dressed up better, but they will still be going on.
2428  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 20, 2006, 12:25:36 AM
Quote
Newt Gingrich, just like Al Gore, is a former Senator. Do you likewise roll your eyes and thing "oh God, here we go again" every time he is discussed in the news?


Yes.  I couldn't give two fucks about what he says either.  I deplore armchair quarterbacks of any kind.  Also, need I remind you: I AM NOT A REPUBLICAN.
2429  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / MAJOR ANNOUNCEMENT - PLEASE READ on: January 19, 2006, 11:36:55 PM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
Now Ron is going to get everything set up great, we will love the place for a year.  Then IGN will offer him $500 million, and the site will be assimilated  biggrin


That will NEVER happen (unless I get a cut...)
2430  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 19, 2006, 11:35:16 PM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
So, let me ask you something, Mike. Did you read Al Gore's speech, and if so, what do you think about it?  (And you too, Poleaxe, even though I already know you will dismiss it outright).


Yes, I did, in fact.  While there are, of course, some well made points in it, they are so obfuscated by rabble-rousing, hypocrisy, and an over-inflated sense of self-importance that I found it hard to take the man seriously.  Do you think, for a moment, that the very administration he was a part of was not guilty of abuses of power, that, in fact, every administration for the last 40 years has been secretly keeping tabs on it's populace in the same manner?  Why do you think Bush was so nonchalant about it?  It's been a given for decades, the only thing his administration is truly guilty of is the arrogance of admitting it.

For someone who bowed out of the last presidental race, Al Gore sure does try a lot to remain relevant in today's politics.  And what is he doing?  Preaching to the converted?  What good does that do?  He holds no office, all he does is travel around every once in a while and tells his paying audience that the government should do what he thinks they should do.  I'm sure there are a bunch of representatives and senators sitting around saying "sure, Al, we'll take it into consideration... (rolleyes)"

He is irrelevant and an overblown windbag.  If he wants me to care about his opinion or what he thinks the govt. should do, he should get back in the fucking game.
2431  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 19, 2006, 10:48:59 PM


"Come and see the violence inherent in the system! Help! Help! I'm being repressed!"
2432  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Which Forum Look do you use? on: January 19, 2006, 06:47:41 PM
As we are currently working on a redesign of the site, we don't want to leave the forums out in the cold.  That's what this poll is for.

I can guarantee you that the design will be a lot more integrated with the new look and feel than this one is smile
2433  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / LOST - 01/18/06 - FIRST HOLY CRAP of 2006! on: January 19, 2006, 03:19:22 AM
Meh, I didn't really care for this episode, what little of it there was between the seeming deluge of commercials.  So the Others are basically a bunch of hillbillies?  I really thought that this episode kind of de-fanged them a bit and made them less interesting.
2434  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 19, 2006, 03:14:56 AM
Name calling?  Do you understand that I was calling your logic flawed and infantile and not you?  Can you even tell the difference?

Look, you can vote however you like, I respect your right to do that, I respect your motivations to do that, I am not attacking you because I disagree with how you decide to vote.  And by your own logic, a vote for democrat in my state was vote that was predestined to lose, so you in fact are saying that I should have voted for Bush as there was no doubt in anyone's mind that he would have carried the state of Texas.

And you are correct, I don't find the value of voting AGAINST someone, I'm not into settling for the asshole figurehead of the party that is only slightly less corrupt than the one currently in power.  When I vote it is a personal endorsement for the person, party, or issue that I agree with most, and there are a heaping ton of things that I disagree with in regards to both republicans and democrats.  I don't believe in just settling, or spitefully voting against someone.  I would sooner not vote, and frankly, that is a worse offense in my book.

Good day, sir. finger
2435  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 18, 2006, 01:20:11 PM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
Well, your opinion is that voting for a Democrat is worthless.  I happen to have a different opinion, and one which is backed up by measurable facts.

I don't subscribe to the belief that all opinions are sacrosanct, or that they are all equally valid.  Obviously, opinions which are supported by some kind of data are weighted much higher than idle speculation or good ol' faith.

Hey, it's a free country.  If you want to believe the earth is flat, go right ahead.  Just don't act surprised or indignant when other people aren't receptive to what you are preaching.  You have the right to your beliefs, but so does everyone else.


So, using your own flawed and infantile logic, any vote other than democrat is worthless, any vote that happens to run contrary to you is worthless.

I think you need to read your last paragraph in that post very carefully, my friend.
2436  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 18, 2006, 05:02:59 AM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
I'm not making assumptions.  But if your vote isnt changing anything, did you even vote?

Until there is a viable (by which I mean someone with a politically significant following) third-party candidate, IMO you have not.

And the clear evidence of vote manipulation during the 2000/2004 elections makes that situation all the worse.  If you allow one party to rig votes, than the other one has to cheat just to keep up.  That essentially squeezes out any potential third party candidate.


Oh, like my vote in Texas was going to have much of an effect anyway?  Was there any doubt which way the state would swing?  My vote had a much better chance adding to the number of vote which would enable better funds for a third party next election.

And I will vote how I damn well please, thank you.  If nobody ever votes for third party candidates then we will be stuck in this fucking shit forever.
2437  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 18, 2006, 04:58:23 AM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
The problem is that people tend to cite a few corrupt politicians waving the Democrat banner, and say "SEE SEE!!! THEY ALL DO IT!!!"


I'm not saying all politicians are corrupt, I'm syaing the republican and democrat parties are.

Quote
I don't believe power corrupts.  I believe corrupt people are drawn to power.  Therefore, the most important thing any organization can do is choose it's leaders, and not empower immoral people.  Our government doesn't do a great job of that, but it has, until recently, tended to do an adequate job of it.


I agree with you, if by 'until recently' you mean since the last 40 or so years.


Quote
The problem, from my perspective, is that you have a political party in which it's leadership is composed of criminals.  These people were criminals before they went into government; it's amazing how Republican voters seem to ignore the histories of who they vote for.


If you are going to adress the people posting in this thread that are republicans, don't make a blanket 'you' statement. It's not very polite.

Quote
But, as most recent polls show, 28% of Americans will eat from whatever toilet the GOP puts in front of them.


And what I am saying is that you are eating the same shit, just from a different toilet and with a gallon of perfume dumped on it.  Don't believe the hype.
2438  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 18, 2006, 04:50:57 AM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
I view that as a non-valid excuse to throw up your hands and give up.  But hey, that's your right, and you are welcome to it.

And one can demonstrably show that America has done far better, by a great many measurements, with Democratic leadership than under Republican leadershit.


Sorry, I haven't thrown up my hands and given up, I just refuse to prescribe to the bullshit dominance of the two-party system.  I vote third party every election in the hopes that someday it will make a difference.  Please stop making assumptions.
2439  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 18, 2006, 04:26:34 AM
No no no, you misunderstand me.  The Republicans and Democrats have been playing 'good cop/bad cop' with us for decades- they are both in this for the goal of keeping themselves in power.  One side is not more altruistic than the other, they are both shady and corrupt as shit.  That's why third parties have been quashed or discredited for so long.  It's as plain as the nose on my face.
2440  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [RP] Unchecked Presidential Power on: January 18, 2006, 02:41:50 AM
Quote from: "unbreakable"
Anyone care to answer my question?  What is the line in the sand beyond which Bush's supporters start disagreeing with him?

Or is ridiculing "the enemy", by which I am refering to the (at least) 50% of Americans who back the Democrats, far more important?


I think I'll stick with my long-standing plan of ridiculing both "sides" of our idiotic and corrupt political system, thank you.  

When are all of you going to realize that both "sides" are in cahoots?  Call me when a viable third party gains some momentum (which will be never thanks to the other two "sides").

Fnord.
Pages: 1 ... 59 60 [61] 62 63 ... 74
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.45 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.137s, 1q)