http://gamingtrend.com
February 13, 2016, 02:49:38 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 46
1641  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Make your VEEP predictions! on: September 03, 2008, 08:02:12 PM

Quote from: cheeba on September 03, 2008, 06:21:11 PM

Quote from: msteelers on September 03, 2008, 06:17:33 PM

Quote from: cheeba on September 03, 2008, 06:11:25 PM

Quote from: Toe on September 03, 2008, 05:24:39 PM

If voting with Bush over 90% of the time is what "experience" brings to the table, I can do with out it thank you. smile
Should you really be plagiarizing Obama like that?

Only if it's true.
I didn't question whether or not it was true. Rather, I questioned how reciting a candidate's talking points adds anything to the discussion. This is a R&P forum, not a place to cut n paste bullet points from MyFavoriteCandidate.com.

I misunderstood your post then. Carry on.
1642  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Make your VEEP predictions! on: September 03, 2008, 06:17:33 PM

Quote from: cheeba on September 03, 2008, 06:11:25 PM

Quote from: Toe on September 03, 2008, 05:24:39 PM

If voting with Bush over 90% of the time is what "experience" brings to the table, I can do with out it thank you. smile
Should you really be plagiarizing Obama like that?

Only if it's true.
1643  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Can't decide? Take a quiz... on: September 02, 2008, 09:39:58 PM
My first test I got 68% Obama or something like that. The second test I tried to answer as if I was a huge McCain supporter. It gave me 84% McCain and had this blurb:

Quote
The results are in, and John McCain is definitely your choice.
You're probably not surprised. It's possible you've had your eye on McCain for years.

Popular or not, you will likely stick by McCain. For you, it's a matter of principle.
And besides, there's something exciting about rooting for the underdog!

It doesn't tell me to think about voting for Obama, but it doesn't make it look like voting for McCain is a good idea either.
1644  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: A few nerdy Star Wars questions on: September 01, 2008, 03:46:10 PM
I thought that there was debate in the Jedi council as to whether or not Anakin was even the chosen one? I always took from the movies that Qui-Gon believed Anakin to be the chosen one, but was wrong. Luke Skywalker was the one to bring balance to the force by destroying the Emporer and bringing Anakin back to the light side.

But that was just from watching the movies. I don't read the books or anything, so I'm probably missing something.
1645  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Star Wars - remake(Would you watch it?) on: September 01, 2008, 03:27:58 PM
They will be remade and they will suck. It's a fact. Hopefully it wont be for another 20 years or something.

I would be interested if they do another series of movies that take place after the original trilogy, but hopefully Lucas is not involved with the script.
1646  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Why is my xbox wet and smells like...oh no... on: August 29, 2008, 09:13:23 PM

Quote from: JuniorDan on August 28, 2008, 01:34:16 AM

Quote
it doesn't heat up any pee and make my house smell like the stairwells of the parking garages in downtown Orlando...you know. The ones the homeless people like to pee in.

Um..... You my friend should not lay blame on the homeless like that. You obviously never left Antigua or Tabu at 3 a.m. and countless drinks after. Those stairwells in the parking garages, becomes your savior.   ninja I'am just saying  Truthiness!   
Now about you xbox like papasmurff said liquid cooling for the win.....

Jeez. Can't you wait until you are next to your car like everyone else? Have some respect.
1647  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: My dog died today on: August 26, 2008, 10:05:34 PM
Sorry for your loss.  icon_cry
1648  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: The "no-penalty" death trend on: August 26, 2008, 11:25:16 AM
I haven't played Too Human, so the only games I've played so far with this mechanic are Prey and Bioshock. If the trend is more towards Bioshock, I have no problem. If the trend is more towards Prey, then there is something wrong.

Instead of having no penalty as a way to help people finish the game, IMO they should focus on a good auto-save system, combined with the ability to save anywhere. Even if someone never saves on their own, they should never be more than 15 minutes away from where they died. Even that can be stretching it if the game itself is very frustrating. Having the ability to skip cut scenes is a must too. It's inexcusable to load up a save game, and then have to wait for 5 minutes or longer before starting the boss battle.
1649  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Why is my xbox wet and smells like...oh no... on: August 25, 2008, 01:48:58 PM

Quote from: HankRaptor on August 25, 2008, 01:29:29 PM

What size of a dog is it? Teacup Yorkie? or Rotweiler?

A 40 lb. German Sheppard mix.

Quote from: Jeff Jones on August 25, 2008, 01:43:11 PM

Quote from: msteelers on August 25, 2008, 12:15:36 PM

So either I dodged a bullet or I am sitting on a ticking time bomb, and I wont have a way to find out for sure until the bomb explodes.  paranoid

All 360's are ticking time bombs.  icon_wink

 icon_biggrin
1650  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Why is my xbox wet and smells like...oh no... on: August 25, 2008, 12:15:36 PM
Well, I fired it back up this morning, and played some Rock Band for about 40 minutes with zero problems. I'm keeping my fingers crossed that nothing important got wet, although I don't know how that would be possible. So either I dodged a bullet or I am sitting on a ticking time bomb, and I wont have a way to find out for sure until the bomb explodes.  paranoid
1651  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Why is my xbox wet and smells like...oh no... on: August 25, 2008, 12:06:56 AM
So, earlier today I bend over to pick up a dog toy that is sitting in front of my xbox, and I noticed that there is dry yellow crust all over the top of the console. I lean in closer to investigate, and quickly realize that my dog has decided to take a piss all over my 360, and the CivRev disc which was sitting on top of the console. Everything was soaked. I actually was able to tilt the xbox and pee poured out of it. I wiped everything up, and it turned on fine, accessed information on the hard drive, and the game even started to play. I'm hoping that there wont be additional damage over time, or that if the xbox is on for awhile, it doesn't heat up any pee and make my house smell like the stairwells of the parking garages in downtown Orlando...you know. The ones the homeless people like to pee in.  mad
1652  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Why is this the business of the government? on: August 22, 2008, 07:06:53 PM

Quote from: Moliere on August 22, 2008, 05:04:56 PM

Quote from: Pyperkub on August 22, 2008, 04:30:33 PM

Bullshit.  Most restaurants and bars don't provide healthcare benefits either - as such, the state usually ends up picking up the tab for the health care for employees who have been sickened by the smoke, etc.  There is definitely a public (health) interest here, as it is the public who picks up the tab.
And as a libertarian I think the public should stop picking up the tab for everyone's healthcare. Its because of this public funding of healthcare that the government can justify so much intrusion into our lives, telling us what we can eat, when we can eat it, how much to exercise, what drugs we can ingest. At what point do I become a free human being left to live and die by the daily choices I make it my life? Apparently I'm never allowed that responsibility and its insulting.

Uh. Last I checked I could still swing by Taco Bell on the way home from work, go home, sit on the couch, have a pizza delivered to me, and do whatever else I wanted.
1653  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Why is this the business of the government? on: August 22, 2008, 11:42:43 AM

Quote from: Ironrod on August 21, 2008, 10:26:30 PM

Just out of curiosity, how do you feel about banning smoking in the workplace? Should we let bar and restaurant owners set their own individual smoking policy, and let the marketplace sort them out, or is there an overriding public health interest? Is sick leave policy also being sold as a public health matter, or is it on a par with the 40-hour week and minimum wage?

I'm completely against banning smoking in bars and restaurants actually. As for the workplace, I haven't really thought about it. If the company is the one that creates the ban on smoking, I would be probably be ok with it, although I imagine some of their employees would be pissed.
1654  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Why is this the business of the government? on: August 21, 2008, 09:07:18 PM

Quote from: Moliere on August 21, 2008, 01:12:52 PM

How is this an OR question? The same individuals make up both groups (i.e., business and the public). Of course its in the interest of a business to have a healthy workforce. Having sick employees lowers productivity. The question becomes at what point do we need to have government interference on how they allocate paid time off to their employees. Unless we're talking about a company that has a policy of forcing people with contagious disease to be around others I don't see a need for any interference. The problem is that the government tries to come up with a single solution that is supposed to fit everyone. I know the "free market" are dirty words to some on this Forum, but why not let companies decide a policy and employees choose to work there based upon the policy? Let companies experiment with different combinations of PTO days and allocation methods. For some industries it might make more sense to split it out between vacation days and sick days. I just hate this top down mandate from the government saying every single company in XYZ State has to do it the same way.

I don't think the government needs to come in and say, "this is the way it has to happen." It could be very similar to the minimum wage, where they put a basic minimum on what the company is required to give. At my company full time employees acquire sick days at a rate of 0.83 per month, which equals out to be 10 a year. You can mess with the numbers however you like, but the bottom line would be, "this is the minimum amount of sick days you have to give your full time employees every year."
1655  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Why is this the business of the government? on: August 21, 2008, 11:41:04 AM

Quote from: brettmcd on August 20, 2008, 10:12:26 PM

Quote from: msteelers on August 20, 2008, 09:27:18 PM

I don't necessarily see this a good example of when the government should interfere, but at the same time I think all jobs should offer some sort of sick pay. I know when I didn't have sick days nothing could keep me from coming to work. I wasn't productive, but I was present and getting paid. I also most likely helped spread the current cold or flu through the office.

Someone in the article compares it to federal minimum wage, and I think that is a good comparison. Should the government be able to regulate how much or how little we each get paid? If so, why can't they regulate how many sick days we get?

I dont think the federal government should be able to tell an employer how much an employee should be paid, but thats a discussion for another day.    I

d much rather have the policy my company has of personal days that can be used for anything you want, rather then have a certain number of them set aside that I can only use if I am sick and for no other reason.    If an employer wants to offer sick days thats fine and can even be an advantage in getting people to work there, but that should be the choice of the employer if they want to offer that benefit.

My company does both. We have 10 days set aside for anything we want (sick days, optional days, bereavement, whatever), and we also have 10 vacation days. At times it makes no sense to me why we would have two separate groups.
1656  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Why is this the business of the government? on: August 20, 2008, 09:27:18 PM
I don't necessarily see this a good example of when the government should interfere, but at the same time I think all jobs should offer some sort of sick pay. I know when I didn't have sick days nothing could keep me from coming to work. I wasn't productive, but I was present and getting paid. I also most likely helped spread the current cold or flu through the office.

Someone in the article compares it to federal minimum wage, and I think that is a good comparison. Should the government be able to regulate how much or how little we each get paid? If so, why can't they regulate how many sick days we get?
1657  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Rick Roll on: August 04, 2008, 05:21:39 PM

Quote from: CeeKay on August 04, 2008, 02:51:36 AM

do to the tastelessness of this post I've started a petition to ban msduncan.

Predictable...and funny!
1658  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Woot off in progress on: July 31, 2008, 04:27:52 PM
I got the knife set for $15, and the last day had some pretty good items if only I had a little bit more money. Too bad about the Bag of crap. I stayed up way too late to try and get it, all for nothing.
1659  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Woot off in progress on: July 30, 2008, 05:44:50 PM
Yesterday and last night seemed like it was mostly crap, with the occasional computer or mp3 player tossed in. Today seems better. I picked up a set of 11 kitchen knives and a wooden cutting board for $15 after shipping. So far it has been the only thing I have considered pulling the trigger on.
1660  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: New GameInformer - Wolfenstein, Marvel UA 2 on: July 25, 2008, 11:50:07 AM

Quote from: CeeKay on July 25, 2008, 03:39:27 AM

This M:UA video isn't helping my excitement level rise any.  seriously, the big gimmick is combining two powers into a combo attack?

Wow. That was awful.

The Legends games were some of my favorite games on the xbox. I played a lot of M:UA, but it felt different somehow. And from that trailer, this game looks like it is taking another step in the wrong direction.

Although the story could be good. I was more excited for the opening sequence of the trailer than any of the gameplay footage.
1661  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Broward Circuit Judge Marc Gold -> worse than Jack Thompson on: July 24, 2008, 02:15:35 PM
 saywhat

I love this state.
1662  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: (360 and PS3) No Love for the Release Version of Civ: Revolution? on: July 18, 2008, 05:59:49 PM

Quote from: Dante Rising on July 17, 2008, 07:10:08 AM

Quote from: Jancelot on July 17, 2008, 07:05:57 AM

Bottom line is that it is a great starting point and I hope that it sells well so that we see sequels down the line with some tweaks and a little more depth added in.

A friend of mine who works at Gamestop said that it absolutely bombed in his region. The only version that did even remotely well was the DS iteration. I'm hoping his area is not indicative of sales in general.

I saw on CivFanatics.com that the game has sold out here in the U.S. I also saw yesterday somewhere that the game has been the best selling 360 game on Amazon since it came out. That probably dropped though after NCAA came out, but it is still good.
1663  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: (360 and PS3) No Love for the Release Version of Civ: Revolution? on: July 18, 2008, 04:45:31 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on July 18, 2008, 01:18:50 PM

Has anyone seen a listing of what each difficulty level adds or changes?  I'm curious when the AI starts getting resource boosts, and if they start getting tweaks to their combat rolls.  The former I could take in light doses, but the latter I want to completely avoid if it exists.

After I finally got the culture victory on King difficulty (thank you Roman 1/2 price wonders), I bumped the difficulty up to Emperor and tried a Zulu campaign with focus on domination. I was able to destroy Washington with a single warrior army. The next turn I found Rome, just a few tiles over from Washington. I was able to take them out fairly easily, with the Warrior Army, a Horsemen Army, and a Catapult Army. I also used a great person to flip their second city.

As soon as I finished up Rome, the Germans and French decided to make themselves known. The French at this time were already closing in on a culture victory, needing just 10 more great people, flipped cities, or wonders. The Germans immediately declared war on me and started sending wave after wave of Legion armies at me. By this point they had at least 4 cities, two of which were on choke points that could quickly grow and produce armies. They also were flying through the tech tree, and were coming at me with cannons and knights while I still had archers, catapults, and horsemen. At the same time, the French started pumping out wonders, but it didn't appear like the Germans were pushing towards them at all. It was as if all of their energy was on me.

So, from the half game I played, it looks like research and combat was the same. The Germans were more advanced than me because they had bigger cities than I did, and most of my cities were focused on gold production. Also, the German perk is to automatically upgrade elite units, which is most likely why they were able to come at me with these upgraded armies as soon as they were available. What changed was the strategy. City placement seemed better, and the armies did a good job sieging cities and using the terrain to their advantage.
1664  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: (360 and PS3) No Love for the Release Version of Civ: Revolution? on: July 17, 2008, 01:25:53 PM
I am having a lot of trouble getting a cultural victory on King difficulty. It just seems like that lags behind everything else. The closest I ever got was a couple days ago. I was building the United Nations wonder, but the game said that the game would end after 5 more turns, and whoever had the highest score would get a domination victory. I needed 7 more turns to build the United Nations and win the game  icon_mad

Any advice on how to get this type of victory?
1665  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Shocking News!! Game Reviewers admits not finishing the games for review on: July 15, 2008, 09:17:01 PM

Quote from: Purge on July 15, 2008, 07:25:23 PM

Quote from: msteelers on July 15, 2008, 06:04:50 PM

If you are getting paid to review a game

Key statement. If. If this was a 40hr work week for me, then I suppose I could put out a comprehensive review of Oblivion in 2.5 weeks, and for it to be effective I'd need to get some pretty damn good money for it. There is a balance of critique and game decomposition/analysis. Perhaps just getting the ESRB folks who've already picked it apart to find the content rating to give you their review, right? slywink

True, but at the same time epic games like Oblivion are relatively rare. Most games can have the single player experience finished in 10-20 hours. I don't think it is unreasonable to expect people who get paid to put in the required time to finish the game. If you don't get paid, just be honest with how you played the game.
1666  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Shocking News!! Game Reviewers admits not finishing the games for review on: July 15, 2008, 06:04:50 PM
If you are getting paid to review a game you should try to finish the game before posting reviews. The only time I think this will get a pass is if it is a game that could go on forever (like the Elder Scrolls games), or really long RPG's. But if you don't finish a game, tell the reader what you did. If you are reviewing NCAA, say how many seasons of a dynasty you did, or which characters you created for campus legend. Or acknowledge that you haven't finished the game, and why you don't want to, or will.
1667  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: NCAA 09 Impressions? on: July 15, 2008, 04:53:05 PM
I was going to go and pick this up today, but I am in the process of moving so cash is really tight right now. Plus, I am still really enjoying CivRev. I'll probably pick this up in a week or two when I get settled in the new place.
1668  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Is ANYONE playing CoD4 online anymore? on: July 08, 2008, 02:56:45 PM
Between Halo 3 and COD4 I think I got burned out on first person shooters for awhile. I tried the BF:BC demo but it did nothing for me. Now I'm in a more laid back mood with my games. I've spent a lot of time in Lost Odyssey recently, and this week I will pick up Civilization Revolutions and NCAA next week. Those two games will probably last me for a couple of months, until the fall games start coming out, when I'll probably be screaming for some first person shooter action.
1669  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: July 07, 2008, 08:09:56 PM
My 2nd test was 19, which is good since my first test was just 7, but I was really shooting for 20. I didn't get up in time this morning to do my workout, so I'll do it when I get home from work today.
1670  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: July 01, 2008, 08:31:49 PM

Quote from: jersoc on July 01, 2008, 07:06:29 PM

I always start to crap out on the 3rd set around 12'ish. I can manage to finish, but just barely. I don't really work out, but I think part of the reason is I have a bad habit of holding my breath. I pretty much have to force myself to breath while doing them. Any tips on changing that?

I've always been told to make sure that you are breathing out when you are doing the "lifting", and breathe in when returning to the starting position.

So for a pushup, breathe in when you lower yourself to the floor, and breathe out as you push yourself up.

It's important to breathe during the exercise, and for some reason exhaling as you are lifting helps, or at least seems like it does.
1671  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: July 01, 2008, 06:57:31 PM
Thanks for all the support. I like to look on the bright side of things, and I already found a new apartment, which is a block away from my gym. So now I have no more excuses.

I'm going to North Carolina tomorrow morning, but I will still do my pushups Wednesday and Friday and be back Monday to update.

My right shoulder hurt a lot Saturday night. At first I thought it was from the pushups, but it hasn't hurt since, so I am starting to think I might have been leaning on it on the couch the wrong way, or something. And the wrists still feel good since I've made sure that they point forward and not cheat out to the side.
1672  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: July 01, 2008, 02:44:14 PM
Well, I found my motivation. My girlfriend of three years left me Sunday night. We have been living together for two years and was about to sign a new lease that was to take affect today actually.

Focusing that emotion into the pushups made Week 2 Day 1 seem easy  mad ...  crybaby
1673  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: June 27, 2008, 04:04:00 PM
Day 3 is done! Unfortunately I took a little longer than 120 seconds between the sets. I feel good though.
1674  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: June 26, 2008, 09:03:19 PM

Quote from: jersoc on June 26, 2008, 06:24:59 PM

Quote from: Gratch on June 26, 2008, 02:35:23 PM

Do you guys point your hands forward, or out to the side?  I tried doing them forward, but it absolutely killed my wrists.  Not sure if pointing them to the side would alter which muscle groups are working.

holy jebus, forward. i can't imagine pointing them to the side would be better for the wrists.

I'm pretty sure for my initial test my hands were pointing out, and my wrist was killing me. But for the first two days I have been pointing them straight and the wrist hasn't been a problem.
1675  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movies]Wall-E Impressions on: June 26, 2008, 09:01:08 PM
I must be the only person in the country that knows nothing about this film. I haven't seen anything for it except for posters when I go to the movies, and people in forums saying how excited for it they are.
1676  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: District of Columbia v. Heller -- Decision tomorrow on: June 26, 2008, 07:11:11 PM
Since overall I agreed with the decision of the court, I wanted to check out the dissenting opinions first. I don't have time to read the whole thing, but so far I have worked through about the first 17 pages of Stevens dissenting opinion, and I'm surprised. So far he has focused on the interpretation of the text of the amendment, and why he feels it most likely was meant for the militia and not individuals.

There are two good points he makes. The first is the implied use of the firearms. Obviously they weren't meant to commit a crime, which leaves hunting, shooting for sport, defense, and fighting in an army (or militia or whatever). The text of the amendment specifically mentions fighting in the militia, but none of the other options. Why would the "Framers" leave them out if they were implied? Stevens points to the Declaration of Rights for Pennsylvania and Vermont, which were written around the time of the 2nd Amendment, both of which specifically mention “the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of
themselves and the state”. Why would the authors of the amendment leave it out when contemporary text specifically kept it in?

The other good point he makes is interpreting "to keep and bear arms". He claims that the phrase at the time the amendment was written, referred to military use. "To Keep" meant that members of the militia were allowed to store their weapons at home, and "bear arms" implied the military use.

So far it has been an interesting read. I still agree that people should be allowed to own guns, but I can understand why the decision was so close.
1677  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: District of Columbia v. Heller -- Decision tomorrow on: June 26, 2008, 03:45:21 PM

Quote from: Tareeq on June 26, 2008, 03:06:41 PM

We've made a pdf copy of the full opinion with all dissents available for download at Popehat.

http://www.popehat.com/2008/06/26/the-plural-of-person-is-people/

Awesome. When I first saw that pdf I thought it was just the majority opinion. Good to know it has the dissenting ones as well.
1678  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: District of Columbia v. Heller -- Decision tomorrow on: June 26, 2008, 02:54:41 PM
I'm interested in seeing the dissenting opinion. I saw on CNN that it was a 5-4 decision. I'm surprised it was that close.
1679  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: 100 Pushups - 6 week program. Who's in? on: June 26, 2008, 02:27:12 PM
I usually keep my hands fairly wide. Normally just outside of my shoulders. I definitely feel it in my shoulders and down my sides for some reason. And after Day 2 my chest felt like it did after a normal workout routine.
1680  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Help me like The Who on: June 25, 2008, 05:34:06 PM
I think seeing them live is the way to get hooked. When I was a kid I heard the songs on the radio but didn't care too much. But my Dad took me to go see them (Daltry, Townshend, Entwistle, and Starkey) when I was about 13. I've been hooked ever since.

I really like the DVD of their performance at the 1970 Isle of Wight Festival. It has a lot of their early hits, and a short version of Tommy that they perform live.

You can get the special edition from amazon for $14.99, or the regular edition for $3.99 or something like that.

The next step would be one of their "best of" albums, My Generation: The Very Best of The Who. It looks like it has been re-released a couple of times over the years, but I don't know the difference between them outside of price, which ranges from under $1 to $21.99.

If there is a part of you that is going to like The Who, you will know after listening to that album or watching them live.
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 46
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.188 seconds with 21 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.07s, 1q)