http://gamingtrend.com
August 31, 2015, 01:39:00 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 28
121  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Re: These forums don't remember me!!! on: October 08, 2012, 11:02:37 PM
Are you using http://www.gamingtrend.com/forums or http://gamingtrend.com/forums ? If you are using the first one then try the second one.
122  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Nation Celebrates First Full Week Without Mass Shooting!! *UPDATE* NEVERMIND on: August 27, 2012, 10:46:34 PM
Another shooting:

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/shooting-baltimore-area-high-school-day-back-student-opens-fire-cafeteria-article-1.1145379
123  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Sleeping Dogs for $33.75 on: August 08, 2012, 04:02:49 AM
ORDER-NTCOM-PLETE 25% off any game? I used it to get Sleeping Dogs for $33.75.
124  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Re: Windows 8 - 10/26/2012! on: July 26, 2012, 07:45:54 AM

Quote from: EngineNo9 on July 26, 2012, 04:06:53 AM

Quote from: Victoria Raverna on July 25, 2012, 11:12:08 PM

I think he is worrying about losing to Microsoft's version of apps store and the flood of cheap $1-$5 games on that store.

I highly doubt that.  

Apple's apps store had "cheapen intellectual properties" far more than Steam sales. $10 in Apple apps store is considered to be expensive. The same with Google Play's apps pricing.

If Microsoft manages to get ios developers that make cheap casual games to make apps for Windows 8 apps store that can run on Windows RT tablets, Windows 8 tablets, and Windows 8 Desktop and laptops, it can affect the pricing of PC games and also compete with Steam.
125  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Re: Windows 8 - 10/26/2012! on: July 25, 2012, 11:12:08 PM
I think he is worrying about losing to Microsoft's version of apps store and the flood of cheap $1-$5 games on that store.

126  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 24, 2012, 07:30:15 AM

Quote from: VictorGrunn on July 24, 2012, 03:00:20 AM


To use one example, here's a report on how Australia's gun ban has affected gun crime.

Quote
It is a common fantasy that gun bans make society safer.  In 2002 -- five years after enacting its gun ban -- the Australian Bureau of Criminology acknowledged there is no correlation between gun control and the use of firearms in violent crime.  In fact, the percent of murders committed with a firearm was the highest it had ever been in 2006 (16.3 percent), says the D.C. Examiner.

I'm sure someone's going to call bias on the site, but the stats are what they are. Passing a law is not equivalent to enforcing the law. The Prohibition shows as much. Don't confuse a ban on guns with the literal lack of availability of guns, particularly for people who are willing to break the law anyway.

Not only biased, that article is wrong.

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/05/gun-control-in-australia/

Quote
Have murders increased since the gun law change, as claimed? Actually, Australian crime statistics show a marked decrease in homicides since the gun law change. According to the Australian Institute of Criminology, a government agency, the number of homicides in Australia did increase slightly in 1997 and peaked in 1999, but has since declined to the lowest number on record in 2007, the most recent year for which official figures are available.

Furthermore, murders using firearms have declined even more sharply than murders in general since the 1996 gun law. In the seven years prior to 1997, firearms were used in 24 percent of all Australian homicides. But most recently, firearms were used in only 11 percent of Australian homicides, according to figures for the 12 months ending July 1, 2007. That’s a decline of more than half since enactment of the gun law to which this message refers.

What is higher? 24 percent in the 7 years prior to 1997 or 16.3 percent of 2006?

Now if you don't trust factcheck.org then check directly to the source:

2007-2008 http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/8/9/D/%7B89DEDC2D-3349-457C-9B3A-9AD9DAFA7256%7Dmr13_004.pdf : 12% of homicide are by firearms.

2006-2007 http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/F/F/B/%7BFFB9E49F-160F-43FC-B98D-6BC510DC2AFD%7Dmr01.pdf : 10% of homicide are by firearms.    

2005-2006 http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/8/B/0/%7B8B014968-18C2-44D4-8055-1F66C6BE0F2A%7Drpp77.pdf : 14% of homicide are by firearms.

And compare to prior of gun control (1989-1996):

http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/F/2/6/%7BF267B5F0-BB7E-4772-A64C-1B36DC33B377%7Dti75.pdf : 21% of homicide are by firearms.

As for the total homicide incident rate per 100000 (not only firearms related)?

1989-90 1.8
1990-91 1.9
1991-92 1.8
1992-93 1.9
1993-94 1.8
1994-95 1.8
1995-96 1.6
1996-97 1.6
1997-98 1.6
1998-99 1.7
1999-00 1.6
2000-01 1.6
2001-02 1.8
2002-03 1.5
2003-04 1.4
2004-05 1.2
2005-06 1.4
2006-07 1.2
2007-08 1.2
127  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 23, 2012, 08:02:29 PM

Quote from: Isgrimnur on July 23, 2012, 07:59:31 PM

Our country was formed by the violent overthrow of our colonial masters.  Gun ownership is enshrined in our Bill of Rights, part of our amended Constitution.  It's a central tenet of who we are.

Isn't that outdated? Guns were useful in overthrowing oppressive colonial masters, but in modern world, you need bigger firepower and military equipment to do it.

128  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 23, 2012, 07:59:35 PM

Quote from: rshetts2 on July 23, 2012, 07:48:54 PM

Besides a ban on guns wont stop criminals from having guns, it will just stop law abiding citizens from having them. 

It'll stop a large percentage of criminals from having guns. Just look at countries with a total ban on guns, there are still some criminals that have access to guns but majority of the criminals don't.

Why have a law against drunk driving? People still drive while drunk. It'll not stop law breakers from drunk driving, it will just stop law abiding citizens. smile
129  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 23, 2012, 07:54:52 PM

Quote from: Isgrimnur on July 23, 2012, 07:21:38 PM

We're not tossing out the 2nd Amendment. 

Why not?

Why do you need the 2nd Amendment?
130  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 23, 2012, 07:52:30 PM

Quote from: rshetts2 on July 23, 2012, 07:34:49 PM

Quote from: Victoria Raverna on July 23, 2012, 07:15:53 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on July 23, 2012, 06:47:48 PM

Quote from: gellar on July 23, 2012, 06:16:34 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on July 23, 2012, 05:23:59 PM

Generally, it feels like gun control laws are much like the piracy warnings on DVDs.  Law abiding people get annoyed and hindered by them, while the law breakers bypass them entirely.

I disagree with this mostly.  Stealing a movie or game is difficult to get caught in and the consequences are rather light (short of getting wtfsued by the RIAA or MPAA).  Getting caught with a gun is considerably easier to do than getting caught with an illegal copy of Call Me Maybe on your iPhone.

You seem to be focused on the odds of getting caught, but the intent of my analogy was with regards to the effectiveness of the preventative measures.  Criminals are stymied by strict gun control just as much as a movie downloader is stymied by the copy protection notice he will never see.

A total ban of gun can stop someone like this Holmes.


Sure because theres no way if theres a total ban of guns, that Holmes could have gotten his hands on one.   retard

It'll make it harder if not near impossible for him to get guns if there is a total ban. People always claim that criminals can always get guns, but it'll still be much harder for them to get them if there is a total ban. For someone like Holmes that have no criminal background and connection, it'll be much harder.
131  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 23, 2012, 07:15:53 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on July 23, 2012, 06:47:48 PM

Quote from: gellar on July 23, 2012, 06:16:34 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on July 23, 2012, 05:23:59 PM

Generally, it feels like gun control laws are much like the piracy warnings on DVDs.  Law abiding people get annoyed and hindered by them, while the law breakers bypass them entirely.

I disagree with this mostly.  Stealing a movie or game is difficult to get caught in and the consequences are rather light (short of getting wtfsued by the RIAA or MPAA).  Getting caught with a gun is considerably easier to do than getting caught with an illegal copy of Call Me Maybe on your iPhone.

You seem to be focused on the odds of getting caught, but the intent of my analogy was with regards to the effectiveness of the preventative measures.  Criminals are stymied by strict gun control just as much as a movie downloader is stymied by the copy protection notice he will never see.

A total ban of gun can stop someone like this Holmes.
132  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Aurora and gun control on: July 23, 2012, 08:06:50 AM
A question to those that think that having more guns help in this situation. If there are multiple people that carry guns and shooting, how do you as a gun carrier know which one to shoot at and how do you avoid getting shoot by other gun carriers? How do you know if the "terrorist" is acting alone or if there are multiple of them?
133  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Steam Deals Thread: SUMMER SALE! - 30% Trade Bonus at GameStop for Steam Funds on: July 16, 2012, 11:24:41 PM
Fable 3 is up for flash sale.

Since the game is not available for my country, can someone here help me by gift Fable 3 Understone Quest Pack DLC to me. It is only $1.24 during the flash sale, but the sale end less than 2 hours from now.
134  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: What's your Steam Sale haul on: July 16, 2012, 04:07:39 AM
Two Worlds II Velvet Edition
Darkness II
Bastion
Skyrim
Trine 2
Alan Wake Franchise
135  Non-Gaming / Forum and Site Feedback / Re: Forum Consolidation? on: July 09, 2012, 02:13:46 AM

Quote from: gellar on July 08, 2012, 12:38:34 AM

I'll post this here as well, what actual purpose does the sub forum thing do?  It seems to negatively impact the user experience (you can't see if there are any new posts in that board from the main board page) and has no noticeable value other than moving the location of the forum link (which to me is no value at all).

I agree. I don't think sub forum is a good idea. Merging game forums are good idea, but using sub forum doesn't have any benefit. Please move R&P forum back to being a separate forum instead of sub forum of off topic.
136  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Steam Deals Thread: Space Ark on: July 03, 2012, 03:36:35 AM
EA convinced Valve to stop "cheapen intellectual property" so no summer sales this year. smile
137  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Red Bottom Shoes on: June 15, 2012, 11:15:15 AM

Quote from: Harkonis on June 14, 2012, 06:33:39 PM

Does anyone know where I can actually get some shoes with red bottoms?   I have this bizarre desire to find some now for some reason.   ninja

http://us.christianlouboutin.com/shoes-1.html smile
138  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Prometheus (previously Alien the Prequel) on: June 11, 2012, 05:06:14 AM

Quote from: leo8877 on June 11, 2012, 04:30:28 AM

Quote from: hepcat on June 11, 2012, 02:12:09 AM

cross posted from OO:

Saw it friday after work.  While I enjoyed it, it did reinforce my opinion that Ridley Scott as a director is, in my opinion, overrated...at least in light of his last decade of work.  The designs and cinematography were great, but I don't believe they lived up to the hype.  I really wanted something new and exciting.  And while I did have fun, I also didn't find anything in it to make it stand out.

As for the story, my issues were:

Spoiler for Hiden:
Our alien creators leave a sign post leading us to their...weapons research facility?    icon_confused

Why did they cast Guy Pearce as an elderly man?  We still haven't advanced enough in film to the point where makeup creates an effective illusion of advanced age.  You've got hundreds of great, older actors out there, for god's sake.  

The last surviving Engineer on the planet is reduced to acting like Jason Vorhees when his ship gets shot down?

If they'd cut out the whole alien pregnacy thing, including the final battle between Space Squid and the Engineer, I wouldn't have minded.  It just seemed tacked on.  Plus, every time Rapace's character ran a quarter mile or so in a full spacesuit after having had major invasive surgery, it just took me out of the film with its goofiness.

Like I said earlier, I enjoyed it, but it did leave me a bit disappointed.

Spoiler for Hiden:
As for why they left the map to a WMD facility...I thought about this too, but they did say that one drawing was 35,000 years old and the dead body was only 2,000 years old, so maybe it wasn't always a WMD making moon?

Spoiler for Hiden:
I think you're correct. The planet is either a hub planet that connected to all planets that the engineer visited or it is their closest base to earth. They're not producing weapons at that planet, they're using the planet as the staging area for their WMD attack on earth.
139  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Diablo III --Impressions start on page 36 -- on: June 01, 2012, 09:05:35 AM

Quote from: CeeKay on June 01, 2012, 07:53:49 AM

Korean Government Raids Blizzard Offices Over Diablo 3 Launch:

Quote
Blizzard can add the Korean Fair Trade Commission to the list of people who were less than pleased about the way it handled the Diablo 3 launch. The FTC raided the game company’s Seoul office on Monday following reports that it denied refunds to eligible gamers, reports the Korea Times.

“We have received many complaints from Diablo 3 users,” FTC spokesman Kim Hyung-bae told the Times. The organization is launching an investigation

The twelve-year wait for the new Diablo game proved anticlimactic for users across the globe when a massive wave of traffic shut down Blizzard’s servers and subjected legions of would-be demon slayers to the unstoppable force of “error 37.” Since Diablo 3 is an online-only game, it meant that even people who only wanted to play single player still found themselves incapable of signing into Battle.net.

Blizzard apparently refused dissatisfied Korean gamers refunds based on sales contract agreements, and the FTC is looking into whether or not those contracts are unfairly keeping gamers from getting their money back after they discover problems with the game.

I hope Blizzard and other publishers learn the right lesson from this. They didn't learn from the Ubisoft's DRM backlash.
140  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Iron Man 3 on: May 31, 2012, 06:48:22 AM

Quote from: Blackjack on May 25, 2012, 06:33:54 PM

I've read too many articles about too many cast members being added and too many characters (I think we'll need a flow chart diagram on our smartphones to understand who the heck all these people are).

I'm afraid all that was not so right about Iron Man 2 and Spider-Man 3 and other overblown sequels that can't figure out who their main villain is or what story to focus on may still come to pass. Which would be a shame. Hopefully I'm wrong.  paranoid

imho the more recent IM comics they're trying to draw inspiration from are great. I just have a sick feeling they're biting off more than they can chew in one 2 hour film.

I just get the impression when they don't have an Origin story to fill in the gaps, studios get worried and throw in as many secondary characters and multiple villains as possible to fill that gap. But what do we really want? We probably want more of the characters we love, and deeper development of them. And a villain who's memorable.

Right now it's sounding like IM3 could have 3, or 4 villains. imho, one primary, memorable villain and maybe an interesting secondary or "lieutenant" is all you really need. The more they overstuff it, the less chance anyone has to be memorable. I just have a sick feeling they're over-stuffing this. Filming starts soon (or maybe already), so we'll see soon enough.

What if they're only focusing on one or two villains? For example: Start the movie with an action sequence of Ironman defeating a villain before the main title. Then the movie is about one main villain (or two). Then after the story conclude, Iron man face the fourth villain and we get "The End" before the actual fight between Iron man and the new villain.
141  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Diablo III --Impressions start on page 36 -- on: May 16, 2012, 04:15:55 AM

Quote from: Harpua3 on May 16, 2012, 04:12:47 AM

Okay, I'm an idiot sucker... I'm downloading this now. Can't wait!

Error 37 is waiting for you. smile
142  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Diablo III --Impressions start on page 36 -- on: May 16, 2012, 04:09:11 AM

Quote from: Crusis on May 16, 2012, 03:30:56 AM

Hmm. Maybe I spoke too soon. I just got booted out and can't get back in. I can't remember, did Starcraft 2 have these problems at launch? Annoying, but I'm sure the last thing Blizzard wants is any kind of outage on launch day.

Bummer, too. I was in an EPIC fight surrounded on all sides, taking on some massive beast that towered over me, the blood vial was pulsing, quaff a potion, get ready to finish the beasty and BAM! Disconnected.

Starcraft 2  let you to play single player without requiring constant internet connection to the server.
143  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Diablo III --Impressions start on page 36 -- on: May 16, 2012, 02:17:06 AM

Quote from: Misguided on May 16, 2012, 02:12:57 AM

While I suppose I can understand some people (in general) being frustrated with issues today, I think it would be unreasonable to expect the launch of a game of this magnitude to go without a hiccup or two.

It would be reasonable to expect Blizzard to improve in quality of their games. With Diablo and Diablo 2 both had stable launch, it is reasonable to expect the same or better launch with Diablo 3. If it is not because of the client/server DRM, we won't have this big disaster. Blizzard didn't learn from Ubisoft's mistake.
144  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Anyone hear of the MMO, Tera? on: May 08, 2012, 06:41:56 AM
Is there a trial version for this? With the action based combat, I don't know if it is playable with the higher ping rate between my location to the server.

145  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Joss Whedon to direct 'The Avengers' on: May 06, 2012, 10:51:23 PM

Quote from: pr0ner on May 04, 2012, 05:59:07 PM

Quote from: Blackjack on May 04, 2012, 03:28:26 PM

PVP Online's Scott Kurtz weighed in (not that he's objective with Whedon, he came up with the "Joss Whedon is my master now!" slogan afterall  icon_smile) on Twitter:
Quote
Scott Kurtz ‏ @pvponline

Best. Superhero. Movie. Ever.
icon_cool

I'm going to have to disagree with that.  It's an awesome movie, but it's not the best superhero movie ever.

Also, there's absolutely no reason to see this in 3D.  It is a conversion, after all.

So what is your best superhero movie ever?
146  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Sim City V!!!! on: March 12, 2012, 02:48:05 AM

Quote from: TiLT on March 08, 2012, 02:39:16 PM

To me it's more about EA's attitude than about the quality of Origin. I refuse to support companies that treat me like shit, which means both EA and Ubisoft currently get the middle finger from me. I'm continually amazed at how many people proclaim that you should "vote with your dollars", yet almost nobody has the backbone to actually follow through. I do, and I will.

I guess you need to boycott Steam, too. Steam/Valve is known to treat customers like shit like locking people from accessing all of their game because of payment problem. Trying to get a customer support to answer a ticket in weekend? It is almost impossible with Steam. With Origin/EA, you get a reply within minutes.


147  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Re: Windows 8 on: March 09, 2012, 01:18:06 AM

Quote from: rittchard on March 07, 2012, 11:22:21 PM

Quote from: Laner on March 05, 2012, 03:39:53 AM

Quote from: Razgon on March 04, 2012, 07:43:01 PM

Would you guys use touchscreen at home on your laptops or stationary computers?

No.  Touchscreens are a compromise at best.   I have no desire to reach up and touch my monitor all the time - seems like an ergonomic nightmare.

Agreed.  I can imagine (maybe) on a small laptop, but I think what I'd prefer is to have the entire lower portion under the keyboard serve as a giant touchpad.  I saw that suggested somewhere.  That way you get the touch capability and feel without getting your grubby fingers all over and having to reachto the monitor constantly.  On a larger screen that's kept further away, I'd agree it would be an ergo nightmare.  Even on a 20" screen I'm sitting far enough that reaching for it would be annoying.

So somewhat like NDS design? Two screens, one big one without touchscreen and one small one with touchscreen build on lower portion of the keyboard? Depend on the application, the small screen can 100% mirror of the big screen or show special control box screen if the full screen application support it. Or maybe get rid of the keyboard and have the lower half of the laptop as a big multitouch touchscreen which can work as a virtual keyboard when use as regular laptop but can also work as a touch screen?

And on a desktop design, also have a tablet as the controller? Somewhat like the design of the new Nintendo console?
148  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Meet Buddy, the Dog who Votes Democrat on: March 05, 2012, 01:14:46 AM
It doesn't matter how many fake voters you have to vote for you if your opponent can manipulate the voting machine to change votes. smile
149  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Limbaugh: Contraception advocate should post online sex videos on: March 03, 2012, 11:49:02 PM

Quote from: corruptrelic on March 03, 2012, 10:57:23 PM

Quote from: raydude on March 03, 2012, 07:01:19 PM

Quote from: corruptrelic on March 03, 2012, 03:56:51 PM

I take no position one way or the other, on one hand you have a catholic university who before she enrolled KNEW she wasn't going to get contraception insurance but took it anyway, and on the other hand, you bring up the good point of some women needing birth control even when not sexually active.

Yes, because so many high school seniors make their choice of college based on how much coverage they get on their health care. Every high school student thinks he/she is invincible. I should know, I was one once. Sidenote: I realize Sandra Fluke is a Law student but the point still stands. If the University is barring graduate students from medicine associated with reproductive systems then they certainly are barring it from undergrads.

But consider this. Say you're a fine upstanding Catholic young woman. You're a virgin, and Georgetown U has accepted you. You attend and in your first year of college you find out you're getting more and more blood when you have your period. You go to Student Health Services and find out you have Von Willebrand disease. No biggie, says the doctor, a lot of folks have this, and yours seems to be genetically inherited. You're probably getting increased blood loss because your body is in its most fertile part of its lifespan. He goes to prescribe you iron pills and birth control pills to help regulate the periods so you at least don't suffer too much blood loss (because wooziness and lethargy from that won't help you study in college).

You say "thanks doc" and then give an OH SHIT when you realize the Georgetown U policy is to not cover the cost of the Pill for sluts like you (sarcasm intended).

Fluke is 30 years old, hardly just got out of high school yesterday. Didn't she also say something about her previous insurance she could get contraceptives with? Sounds like she knew exactly what she was getting into before enrolling in a catholic university.

Not that I'm saying the university is right.. but rather that people should take responsibility for their own actions. I'm sure your description fits a certain number of women, and that part I agree with.. but lets be realistic, if they start mandating contraception be included in insurance then isn't that going to increase premiums? No way the insurance companies aren't going to pass that cost on to us with a higher monthly bill.. so whether you need contraception or not, you're still going to be paying for it.

1. Contraception is included in the current Georgetown health plan for the faculty and staff.

2. Let's be realistic, if they start mandating health insurance to pay for health care? No way the insurance companies aren't going to pass that cost so whether you need healthcare or not, you're still going to be paying for it.
150  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Mass Effect 3 on: February 23, 2012, 10:17:08 AM

Quote from: Turtle on February 23, 2012, 09:26:42 AM

And sure, they could technically delay ME3 to include it, but that means another lengthy final testing phase to retest the entire game again for approval for the combined package.

Doesn't make sense to me. If they are going to release the DLC on day one, doesn't that still require them to test the DLC with full game as combined package before the release date?

151  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Wars: The Old Republic (dev posts, news items, fan sites etc.) on: February 08, 2012, 06:55:50 AM

Quote from: Arkon on February 07, 2012, 10:08:40 PM

I'll be damned if I could find it now, but I swear I recall reading some stats about WoW, and the real cash cow is the casual players, not the hardcore.

Not surprising since there are more casual players than hardcore players. Not everyone can join raid weekly.
152  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Amazing Spider-Man on: February 07, 2012, 10:34:50 AM
Trailer 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rokU4KaGU4I
153  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Wars: The Old Republic (dev posts, news items, fan sites etc.) on: February 07, 2012, 07:07:31 AM
So equipment is the only reason to PvP? So what if you and your entire guild PvP until you all have the best equipments in game, then no reason for PvP in this game = you and your entire guild gone.

Using equipment to entice people to PvP is disastrous to the longetivity of the game. Eventually people have all the best equipments so the game designers have to come up with another tier of "best equipment" and turn the previous tier into mediocre equipments. Eventually people will tired of working to get equipments then have those equipments become worthless because the game need better equipment to get people to PvP.

Instead of doing that, they should make it so people PvP because it is fun or challenging. Or give storyline reason to PvP. Don't copy WoW endgame PvP design.

154  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Thought Ubisoft's 'always connected' activation was bad? It gets worse. on: February 03, 2012, 12:55:09 AM
Quote
Offline modes will not be impacted.

Misleading because to enable Offline modes for most games that are protected by the sucky DRM, you need to be able to connect to Ubisoft's server at least once.
155  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Kinect on the PC! Move too? on: January 10, 2012, 03:47:48 AM
Kinect for XBOX 360 requires a relatively big space to use. Is it the same with Kinect for PC?
156  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: From the things not to do on FaceBook dept..... on: January 06, 2012, 03:09:35 PM
Another thing not to do on Facebook:

Not the best way to promote shark's fin product using Facebook.
157  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Majesty for Apple iPhone and iPad is free today on: January 01, 2012, 08:12:39 AM
Majesty: The Fantasy Kingdom Sim
158  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Steam Deals Thread: Holiday Sale! on: December 31, 2011, 02:30:58 AM

Quote from: kronovan on December 30, 2011, 07:59:17 PM

Sorry I missed your post yesterday. If I was to rate those that are available on Steam my ranking would  be Rome > Medieval 2 > Shogun2 > Empire or Napoleon. I've only admittedly ever shoulder gazed my nephew playing the latter two, but I wasn't as nearly impressed with them.

I bought the Total War Mega Pack and Shogun 2 plus all released DLCs.
159  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Steam Deals Thread: Holiday Sale! on: December 30, 2011, 06:11:56 AM

Quote from: Canuck on December 30, 2011, 06:01:39 AM

Quote from: Crawley on December 29, 2011, 06:45:44 PM

Not much today. Not sure about these prices too. LOTR: WITN was like $15 on Green Man. And Dungeon Siege 3 was $5 on Amazon the other day (but does not come with Dungeon Siege 1/2).

Have to say yesterday's winter achievements for Dungeon Defenders and Revenge of the Titans are freaking impossible - or at least so hard its not worth it. Was having fun trying the achievements up to that point.

Have won 3 games for completing these achievements so far (Fallout collection, Worms Crazy Golf and Left 4 Dead) and a bunch of coupons. Not sure what to do with the coal. Roll the dice or turn them in to another coupon/game.

Wow you are lucky! All Ive gotten for completing achievements so far has been a bunch of coal and bullshit coupons.

Same here, I think I got 18 rewards and only got 3 coupons and 15 coal. Then I turned it 14 coals and got 2 more useless coupons.
160  Non-Gaming / Steals and Deals / Re: Steam Deals Thread: Holiday Sale! on: December 30, 2011, 03:28:28 AM
Question about the Total War series. If I haven't played any Total War games since Rome one, which one is the best for me to pick up now that they're all on sale? Or maybe that grab all of them?

BTW, there is also Total War Mega Pack for 12.49, you get all pre-Shogun 2 games on Steam including DLCs, but if you buy separately by adding  Empire & Napoleon Total War : GOTY + Medieval II Gold + Rome Complete you can get it cheaper than the Mega Pack by 2 cents. smile

To get all Total War games that are available on Steam, you pay $26.12. This is tempting.

EDITED TO ADD:

Be careful if you're going to buy Medieval 2, If you add Medieval 2 to your cart through that Total War holiday sale page, you'l get the base game without Kingdoms expansion.

If you go directly to Medieval 2 page, you can probably find Medieval 2 Gold edition which include Kingdoms expansion for the same price.

For some region including mine, Medieval 2 Gold isn't available to buy so to get only Medieval 2 and the expansion, you need to spend extra $1.24 for the expansion. For region that Medieval 2 Gold is not available and you're going to get all pre-Shogun 2 games and expansions then buying Total War Mega Pack for $12.49 will save you $1.22 instead of being more expensive by 2 cents.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 28
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.477 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.268s, 1q)