April 28, 2017, 11:44:31 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 212 213 [214] 215 216 ... 244
8521  Gaming / Analog Gaming / Re: Warhammer 40k - Am I nuts? on: August 30, 2006, 03:44:07 AM
Although I'm very much a fan of tabletop miniature games, I would have to say stay away from 40k the tabletop game.  Games Workshop has generally moved towards customer hostility for the last few years and current trends follow that.  It's costly, the rules aren't the best out there, it's definitely time consuming to assemble, paint, and then play with an army, let alone two.

Have you considered board games?  Or perhaps you can try the role playing game?

There are some other miniatures games out there that are cheaper, have friendlier companies, better rules, and have as much distribution.

I think you need to see a game being played before you decide.  It's a complete and total dorkfest.  Dudes bring their units in those crazy suitcases with foam interiors.  And 2/3's of the game is spent arguing about rules, complete with "the bringing out of the rulebooks". Sometimes people can cite rules from memory, those are the true l33t's.  That's been my experience from watching anyway.  Oh, and the whole place smells like "no shower".

Oh and unlike the stereotypes people have mentioned here, it's not a complete dork fest although there are undesireable elements that play.  However, when you think about it, that's the very same thing we could say about our main hobby on this website right?  I mean, there are plenty of other gamers we'd be ashamed to associate with.  So it's the same as with any group.

People with suitcases to protect their armies, that's common sense.  If you have something that you own that you bought for a lot of money, then spent a lot of man hours making it look nice, wouldn't you want to protect it?  Some people are fanatical about their cars, it's just a car right?  Photographers buy cases for their cameras, musicians buy cases for their instruments, hell dedicated pool players buy cases for their pool cues.

The same people who argue the rules are the ones that are less desired at the table.  Eventually they go away.  Video games have the cheaters, punks, teamkillers, people who spout constant trash on the microphone, constantly whine about how imbalanced things are, etc...  So yet again another one sided stereotype.

I don't understand what's wrong with memorizing the rules.  I'm damn sure that if many of here can remember exactly how certain video game mechanics work and the best strategies under those mechanics for accomplishing mission objectives.  X-Com anyone?  Dawn of War?  Countless other turn based strategy games?

The people who don't shower are often the first people kicked out of a group.  And even then, it's understandable.  It's more likely that these people come from work to unwind.  Yet, these people are still presentable most of the time, whereas I'm sure any of us gamers can recall times when we've played in horrible states of dress and cleanliness.
8522  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Early Saint's Row Reviews on: August 29, 2006, 08:14:56 AM
How's the multiplayer modes?  Is there split screen?  How does the co-op mode work?
8523  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Any interest in Bomberman:Zero? on: August 29, 2006, 12:43:47 AM
Holy hell... no local multiplayer?  What the hell were they smoking.

One thing that has really pissed me off with the latest crop of games on the 360 is that everyone has ditched or scrapped features for local multiplayer.  They rely too much on live and the local multiplayer features are hurting from it.

These people need to remember that even though online play is fun, consoles are put in the living room for a reason, it lets everyone in the room play on the same TV is the game allows, and that's a big draw.  One of the big reason why games like Halo succeeded was the fact that you had co-op, 4 player split screen adversarial/team play, along with a great online mode.
8524  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Dead Rising impressions! on: August 29, 2006, 12:39:59 AM
Those moments are few and far between.  The game doesn't have much of those moments actually, instead they play up campy, morbid, or just crass humor along the lines of GTA.
8525  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: New Xbox 360 Backward Compatibility Update on: August 29, 2006, 12:34:32 AM
I was waiting for Fatal Frame 2 to become compatable, I think I'll be buying that at the store tonight.

I'm waiting for the full 360 release of HL2 which they said would contain Episodes 1, 2, along with Team Fortress 2 and Portal.

If Mortal Kombat Deception was the one that got good reviews as a farewell game to the classic MK, then I think I'll buy that so that I have some sort of fighting game on my 360.  I just couldn't stand DoA4.
8526  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Dead Rising impressions! on: August 28, 2006, 12:50:30 PM
Actually, you can call to them and even the hurt ones will climb up over obstacles, but the AI for this is more braindead than the zombies, so it's often flakey.

One of the first survivors is trapped behind a counter in a jewelry store and she'll climb over that when called.  However, you may still be right in that I haven't seen them actually climb up over low obstacles.
8527  Non-Gaming / Trading Forum / Re: Looking for some TPB's on: August 28, 2006, 02:29:16 AM
Mwahaha, got you hooked eh?

I have fables vol. 7 and I'd have to get volume 4 back from a friend.  I also have 5-6 and all the issues after vol. 7.

I also have the first three volumes of The Walking Dead, a comic series about, you guessed it, an undead post apocalypse and people trying to survive.

Powers vol. 3 is still on order at my comic shop, it's taking an unusually long time to come in.
8528  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Does anyone still play Perfect Dark Zero? (X360) on: August 27, 2006, 08:46:52 PM
Battlenet and Relic Online, hundreds of FPS games are free on the PC.

Honestly, don't go knocking someone because they're hesitant at paying for something that really shouldn't cost much if anything.

That said live is still a nice service and the cost can be significantly lowered by buying bulk.
8529  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Resistance to take up 22gb? [PS3] on: August 27, 2006, 08:44:38 PM
Just so you know, almost every in-game asset, including 2D and 3D art isn't compressed on the disc by default since compressing it would make load times slower, and since the game itself needs it uncompressed at run-time, it wouldn't help save memory either.

Probably the main reason why it fills that ammount is that they have HD video, or have a lot of models with high res texture maps.
8530  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Does anyone still play Perfect Dark Zero? (X360) on: August 27, 2006, 04:48:52 PM
Also, if you buy the 12 month card in stores, I think all of them give an extra month so it costs even less.
8531  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Supreme Commander - Um.. I'll take one. on: August 27, 2006, 02:40:22 PM
Those are energy steams, they represent power and are one of the ways the developer promotes building buildings closer together, even if that means exposing them to more enemy fire.  I assume having buildings linked by energy like that makes them more productive, or simply powers the building.  Probably all those little buildings that the steam originates from are mini generators.  So considering how many generators are around that thing, I assume it takes a ton of energy to fire.

Oh, and that big cannon is the equivalent of the big bertha.  Yes, it can angle upwards since it can be used to shell things just like artillery.  However, in that screenshot, it's lining up a direct fire shot against the giant walker that's getting much too close for comfort.
8532  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Does anyone still play Perfect Dark Zero? (X360) on: August 27, 2006, 02:30:19 PM
There's wireless ethernet bridges where you simply plug a network cable between it and your 360 and it'll do the same thing, except for a lot less money.
8533  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Amazing looking PS3 game. on: August 27, 2006, 06:37:49 AM
Doesn't matter too much how many games are released for a system on launch, it all depends on whether the launch games are good.
8534  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Does anyone still play Perfect Dark Zero? (X360) on: August 27, 2006, 06:36:23 AM
I played it again recently and man has it improved.  The aim lag weirdness seemed to be fixed completely, along with some new Halo style aim assistance.

However, I still don't like it that much.  I rented just so that some kids coming over for a family party could play it against bots.

Overall, I think they tried to do too much with this game without actually doing some real polishing of the gameplay.  It also adds on more complexity than it really needs.

The whole 3-4 functions on weapons is just ridiculous.

I'm thinking that if they ever make another perfect dark game, that one would be spot on.
8535  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Warhammer: Mark of Chaos beta on: August 27, 2006, 04:26:02 AM
It's a combination of a server/client and peer to peer system.  If the host drops mid game the system can still recover by shifting the absolute host information.  But, it's still primarily peer to peer because, as we all know, one player with a bad connection in the game can slow it down for everyone.  By its nature, server/client setups do not do this.
8536  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: NEW TEAM FORTRESS 2 TRAILER!!!! on: August 26, 2006, 05:58:47 AM
The funny thing is, no one has forced you to wait at all.  There's plenty of other games out there to play.  Valve has shown before that they really do use delays to tighten up the gameplay and fix bugs, so I'd rather have episode 2 later with no bugs, than now with the game unplayable due to bugs.  The same goes for TF2.  I'd rather have TF2 with this new art than the generic modern shooter that it was before.
8537  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: BitTorrent Mark 2 (and completely legal)? on: August 26, 2006, 01:20:42 AM
Tell that to all those rich bastards avoiding their taxes.  slywink
8538  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Dead Rising impressions! on: August 26, 2006, 01:10:22 AM

Quote from: rrmorton on August 25, 2006, 09:20:44 PM

Look, I'm not saying I want just zombies zombies and more zombies. Conflict among the survivors and humans driven crazy and brother turning against brother is (potentially) great stuff. But the balance and the focus here strikes me as way off.

I wouldn't even have that much of a problem doing numerous psychopath missions if the psychopaths themselves were toned down and made more plausible. Like if the supermarket guy simply was insane enough to mistake you for another zombie and used his crazy weapon cart to try to mow you down. That'd be cool. Instead he goes on and on about vandalism in his store? Whatever. The game's psychos are silly, slobbering behemoths. "Clean up in Aisle 4! AGH!!" Gimme a break. And hunky Carlito and sexy Isabella? WTF? Is this a Spanish soap opera?

Ultimately I just want this game to be much better written than it is. Game writing is just godawful compared to any other medium. The gap between this game and, for example, the Dawn of the Dead remake is like a vast, yawning chasm.

Chalk me up as someone who was really turned off by how silly the psychopaths were in this game.  Yes, people will crack in such situations, but these psychopaths were cartoonish caricatures of the truly horrifying reality of what happens when real people crack under pressure.  I would have liked Dead Rising with a lot more serious tone, I think they tried too hard to put the Grand Theft Auto mentality into the game and the whole thing suffered because of it.

As I said before, I'd love to see a game using a wide open locale filled with zombies like this, but set in the resident evil setting with all serious characters and stories.  If there's any game that needs hordes of zombies on screen it's resident evil, all past variations on the game the zombies are just 3-4 scattered in a tight hallway.  With Dead Rising, the most successful thing it does is show how overrun places can get with zombies.

One of my biggest problems with Dead Rising, and this reflects with its overall design too, is that when a zombie grabs you you instantly take damage without an opportunity to shake him off before he hurts you, then if you don't do some arbitrary escape maneuver in time you take more damage.  The whole zombie attack thing just feels arbitrary, as does much of the game and characters.
8539  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 26, 2006, 01:08:48 AM
I think airborne got the shaft in this game.  Not only is its end level abilities significantly less powerful, but everything they do is costly.  Not to mention that the germans have standard units that they can build that will shoot airborne units and airstrikes out of the sky.  So no only are they underpowered and expensive, but their main abilities can be completely nullified by an German unit that's commonly built.

That said, good use of airborne early in the game can net good results, but they have no staying power.
8540  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Lasersquad Nemesis on: August 25, 2006, 03:54:49 AM
Lasersquad got old for me, unfortunately.

I think they need to work on something bigger, LSN has been out long enough, now it's time to effectively remake X-Com or something.  Hell, they could basically remake X-Com with new 2d graphics and some interface/AI fixes and I'd buy it.
8541  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Joe Kucan back as KANE (Edit - MORE screenshots!) on: August 25, 2006, 03:53:12 AM
They have, for all intents and purposes, revealed that the third army are aliens.
8542  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: NEW TEAM FORTRESS 2 TRAILER!!!! on: August 25, 2006, 03:51:40 AM
One thing I loved was how the demoman twirled the cluster bomb grenade, which was basically a pack pf dynamite.
8543  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 25, 2006, 02:51:46 AM
Volksgrenediers suck until you give them the MP40 upgrade.  Then they will tear apart basic infantry at close range.  Once you get the upgrade on a volks squad, assuming your not being suppressed by BAR or MG fire, simply run the squad right up on top of the enemy squad that you want to kill.  Trust me, try this in your next game and you'll be amazed by the results.  The upgrade only works at close range and they're actually less effective at long range, but assuming the squad gets into close range without taking too many losses, I've seen one volks squad take out two basic infantry squads with only a single loss.

There are some things you can do to make your wehrmacht quarters last a bit longer early on.  As above, volks with the mp40 upgrade are deadly at close range.  You can upgrade your engineers with flamethrowers so that they're both effective against infantry at close range and buildings.  Use your snipers much like you would mortars, to pick off otherwise unreachable targets.  Use the MG to hold back infantry, and a couple of motorcycles to quickly respond to attacks.  I actually like the german starting units a lot more than the selection the allies get, where you either get just infantry, with costly upgrades and the jeep, or you get the weapons center with the MG team, mortar, and sniper, all of which are easily killed if caught off guard.

The real power of the defense doctrine is the rocket strike.  Besides the V1, which takes forever to actually hit its target, the rocket strike is the most damaging strike there is.  It'll kill tanks, infantry, you name it.  I've seen a single rocket strike kill an HQ.  You're also supposed to use a lot of bunkers with it, and infantry.  The idea is that the 88s and AT guns you build take out the tanks, and your infantry can quickly replenish their numbers at the bunkers.  Advanced warning lets you see attacks before they come, and registered artillery is just a cheap effective way of keeping enemies from taking your points.  It doesn't have the glamour and flash of blitz or terror, but it's every bit as powerful to players with that play style.

Keep in mind that the allied rocket artillery costs munitions to fire.  Whereas both the nebelwerfer or the halftrack with walking stuka upgrade don't cost any munitions to fire, also the german rockets are much more effective against tanks.

Remember that the population cap is dependant on how many control points you have.  So on larger maps like 3v3 maps, there are a lot more control points to grab, meaning each player will have a much larger army fielded.

Knights cross holders seem overrated in my book.  I suppose they're great close in fighters, and they survive a lot of fire.  But one sniper, mortar, or grenade will do them in.  I suppose they're like the volks with upgrade, run them into an enemy squad so they can kill at close range.

Rangers are definitely still weak on their own.  I suspect they'll really get powerful once you use them as support for tanks.  With the SMG upgrade they can kill infantry fast at close range just like the volks or knights cross, the fire up ability allows them to quickly move into close range even when being shot at.  Then, the bazookas allows them to support tanks in tank on tank battles.  However, with the power of axis tanks, they can't even take on panzers one on one.  I'm going to try using rangers more in my next game as my mid game unit, meant to take out stugs and backup my basic infantry.

Snipers are still way too good, agreed.  It's easy to take them out sometimes, but more often than not your opponent will spam them or use them with support.  The best method for killing snipers, I think, is to have a snipers of your own.  Just have a sniper sitting on your front sitting quietly with camo and hold fire on, assign him a control number.  Then as soon as you see the Unit Sniped message, hit spacebar to jump to it, usually the position that the enemy sniper fired from is dead center of the screen.  Just turn off hold fire and give your sniper an order to kill him, next time the enemy sniper pops out of camo he'll be dead.  Then after you kill the enemy sniper, you can feel free to let your sniper fire at will for a little while until he builds something else to try and kill your sniper.  This is really nasty if you have two snipers.  Also, don't just have one motorcycle/jeep for killing snipers, have a pack of them.  Motorcycles are cheap and fast, jeeps are relatively cheap and surviveable.  You can use them for both sniper killing and quick response.  Oh, and some special troops can spot snipers at a very long range.
8544  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 24, 2006, 05:46:14 AM
Heh, there's just no pleasing you eh Kobra?

Actually, the tiger still mows through shermans and M10s alike, it's just that with the cap changes, unless you bring support I'll have more shermans to surround the tiger and blow it up before you can kill a second one.

The AT guns eat tigers only with the AP ammo, otherwise it'll bounce off most of the time.  AT still costs 310, about as much as a tank, is easily killed by strikes, infantry, and anything from the rear.  That AP ammo ability costs munitions to use and if you want it to stop, take back the munitions points.  Not to mention if you kill the crew, your own infantry can take the cannon.

Remember that the allies also have the same pop cap limit and frankly I like it.

I think they did take the smarter route.  CoH does not pretend to be realistic at all, they simply have a nod towards realism built into the game.  I like the new pacing and so far almost every game I've played has been constant back and forth.  I think it's a testament to the balancing skill of Relic that they changed the pace of the game so drastically and yet so subtley at the same time.

That said, late game Germans are still quite potent, the main thing is that now, if you send out tank units without support of some kind, even the dreaded Tiger will get turned into a pelt.  If you focus too much on one thing, such as early tanks without upgrading them to have turret MGs they can be killed by AT and infantry.  You can still do the tank charge with good success, just make sure to have a mix of tanks and have enough munitions for a strike or two to handle AT clusters.  Some engineers in back are also a must have.

And rangers, I think, are still pretty underpowered.  I would still like more toys for the allies, but think these changes are for the better without escalating the power level of the game.

I've won with both Axis and Allies alike, so it really comes down to using tactics, combined arms, and knowing your army, instead of simply teching up and pumping out yet another swarm of tigers and flakpanzers.

In my last game I had some fun where my opponent, instead of being smart and building tanks or infantry to backup his lone tiger, he build 5 halftracks with the walking stuka upgrade.  Yep, 5 of them.  They were devastating when they fired, but once they did that I could move in my units and pick them apart.  A lone sherman chased them back into his base and was chasing them around their base killing 2 before the tiger finally caught up and destroyed him.  When they next moved out of base an m10 to distract the tiger and an AT gun shooting the rear took the tiger down to a sliver of health and my backup m10s killed both the halftracks and the tiger.  Had he built other tanks or infantry to backup the tiger, he could have swept them around to kill the AT or M10s from the rear and stop the flanking m10s.
8545  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Warhammer: Mark of Chaos beta on: August 24, 2006, 03:36:54 AM
I got into one game so far, no luck on any more.
8546  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Would you Buy the Wii for $229? on: August 23, 2006, 11:48:11 AM
Heh, if you think about it, guitar hero isn't that much better.  Tongue

Anyway, despite all the negetive talk, it'll be interesting to see how shooters turn out for the system.  We might see some sort of return of the rail shooter.
8547  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Warhammer: Mark of Chaos beta on: August 23, 2006, 11:35:17 AM
The problem seems to stem from hosts being behind a firewall, the NAT transversal code is probably not working properly.  Don't mark down the game for that, though as even CoH had plenty of connection problems in early beta.

I finally managed to get into a game and it was pretty confusing as well.  It was supposed to be 2v2, but I started off right next to an enemy.  Thankfully, my artillery starting lobbing rocks at them immediately and I eventually defeated him, then later I ran into the remains of an enemy army, as no doubt he had to fight from the beginning too.  We played what I think was a straight up fight with no resourcing.  There were camps around the map that would replenish your troops if you stood them within a radius of the camp and were not under attack.

There are other modes where you can buy troops while on the field too, and there was a siege map with defenders and attackers.  The game's shaping up really nicely and the dev team has a lot of time to make it great.
8548  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 23, 2006, 07:23:52 AM
I think these people need to realize that CoH is not Dawn of War WW2.

It's supposed to be slower, it's suppost to be tactical.

Germans still dominate late game though, and you have to be extremely well prepared to deal with all the nastiness that late game germany can bring out.

It's kinda sad looking at all the toys that the Germans get to play with.  I really dislike how they balanced it so that the allies have to rush rush rush to win.
8549  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Warhammer: Mark of Chaos beta on: August 23, 2006, 07:21:04 AM
I'm in, downloaded, installed.

Not sure how much I can talk about though, but what I've seen looks good.  I haven't actually played since there's problems with joining games (worse than CoH too) but that's part of beta.  Playing around with the army maker, it seems that army construction is very much like traditional Warhammer.  No building units on the battlefield.
8550  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Archlord Beta on: August 22, 2006, 06:14:51 AM
They also do a lot of pay by the hour too.

Honestly, seeing as how only a tiny fraction of asian MMOs see the light of day in the US and Euro countries, I suspect the market over there us just plain saturated with MMO games and the whole play free, pay for more is the only way to get players.
8551  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Chromehounds : Just bought on: August 21, 2006, 11:16:51 PM
Don't bother with the parts from single-player.  Almost all of them are inferior to parts you can get online.

Probably the best combat experience you can get is to play in free battles, no worrying about losing money.  Although eventually you'll have to jump into real battles to earn money for parts.

Honestly though money means very little in the game and after a while you'll have every part in the game in your stockpile.
8552  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Enchant Arm RPG (360) has multiplayer on: August 21, 2006, 11:10:39 PM
Just saw that the upcoming 360 RPG has an interesting multiplayer mode for what seems like a basic japanese rpg.  Not only can you fight other players with the main characters, but during the game you can collect certain monsters to use in battle, a la pokemon.
8553  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 21, 2006, 09:28:04 PM
Or having both you and your teammate's bases being blown up by one arty strike.

I've been playing some really intense, but rather cheesy matches lately.  Mainly against win at all costs competative players who will game everything to death.

I've seen a lot of sniper spamming mainly and it's just plain getting old.  In one game my sniper killed off 3 enemy snipers in a row in the early game, and somehow he manages to bring in 2 squads of infantry and 2 more snipers of his own to kill my sniper and the rest of my infantry.

One really crappy thing I've seen is how I can push forward and take over 75% of the map after killing off an enemy's garrison forces while taking the same losses, then he'll simply bring out armored cars or tanks, all the while I don't even have the resources.  I think that, after you take the center of the map, keep pushing with just what you have, but tech up to armored cars or tanks ASAP.  Then mass a small force of those units to use against the inevitable counter attack.  If the counter attack doesn't come, then you know the enemy is teching up to and amassing tanks, so it's time to amass some of your own.  It's also a good time to sneak a sniper into the enemy base, or even run an expendable unit into his base to strike at anything you see.

There's also a nasty bug that I get a lot where one man in a squad, usually infantry, will get stuck inside the HQ after retreating or reinforcing, which makes the squad icon appear in odd places on the map.  I have to tell the squad to enter the HQ, then leave to get them back to normal.

These things are just plain ticking me off.

Not to mention I must have the worst timing in the world.  I'll look away from one part of the map to handle some other stuff, just when the enemy launches an attack and kills all my forces there.
8554  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: How do other gamers arrange to play together on: August 21, 2006, 12:08:52 PM
Maybe submit a recommendation to the Xfire people to include a feature that lets you do just that, indicate which games you're up for playing at the moment.
8555  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Selling a WoW Account... on: August 21, 2006, 04:57:14 AM
If someone doesn't buy it for that price, you can always relist once for free.

And frankly, you didn't price too high if someone buys it. slywink
8556  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 20, 2006, 11:55:43 PM
I wouldn't know, I haven't downloaded it.  I suspect skirmish mode is disabled since that might give a little too much of the game away.

I found an interesting bit of information today.  Early on in the game there's still an incentive to build outposts on things, even on low resource points.  Not only do you get extra resources and help prevent quick captures of the point, but building an outpost gives you a lot of XP used to unlock your command branch abilities.  This can give you enough of an edge to make a come-back, even if you're losing battles (and thus not gaining much XP).  It'll also surprise your enemies by how quickly you get your later command abilities.

In one game, the allies ran forward, built outposts on their half of the map, then teched up to tanks and charged.  I lost a lot of stuff and he pushed right up to my base, but by building outposts early, I got enough XP to take the rocket strike ability of the Axis defensive branch.  I quickly rocket striked his entire cluster of 5-6 tanks destroying at least half and severely damaging the rest.  That made him pull back giving me enough time to consolidate.

Over the next half of the game any time he would mass tanks I would drop a rocket strike on them and my stugs would clean up the rest.  Also, all he had was engineers, and any time he would swarm infantry up to take a point I owned, I'd simply drop a cheap defensive bombardment on them, wiping them out.  Thus, even if I was pushed back a bit, he couldn't actually take any points from me.  Then, with advanced warning I could see him massing either infantry or tanks somewhere and respond accordling.  I also had plenty of munitions available to launch these strikes since I had put outposts on two of the +10 munitions points on the map.

I finally got out a Panther and some Panzers, all upgraded, plus I was sneaking a sniper into their base to rocket strike any tanks massed in there and his tank factory too.  Then my teammate aleady had his tanks rolling out, so it was game over.  Our enemies quit out of the game after realizing their defeat.  Viewing the map after the game, they did have about 10 tanks, which was more than our number, but half were hurt and repairing.

Another thing I learned was that Rangers have a ridiculously large sniper detection range.  It's actually larger than the jeep/motorcycle's range.  Then, if the rangers take fire from the sniper, isntead of being pinned just use their fired up ability to run the rangers forward right on top of the sniper.

Also, cover works against tank cannons, strangely enough.  It'll give the tank an accuracy penalty against the infantry, making it less likely that the tank will do damage.
8557  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Company of Heroes Beta Going Public ? on: August 20, 2006, 09:16:29 PM
The demo is on the latest PC gamer demo dvd.  From what I heard it has the tutorial, and two missions.  The intro mission, which starts off right at the end of the intro movie and puts you on Omaha beach, and a mission where you must defend a city from counter-attack.  Not sure if it's Carentan or Caen, though.  People were saying that with the defense mission, you get a certain amount of time to setup defenses before germans start coming in.
8558  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Ultima Online Reborn...again. on: August 20, 2006, 12:15:39 AM
I was actually expecting this to happen for quite some time now.

UO is in a very nice position of having simple, but deep gameplay.  Unfortunately, a lot of their basic design decisions are old, as the game is 9 years old.  I suspect part of this big update will include some streamlining of the game's features.  And honestly, not all MMOs have to follow in the footsteps of EQ with the first/third person 3D viewpoint.

I disagree with removing features that help ease players into the game, or as others call, "carebear shit".  However, open PvP is a very key feature of UO and they should have some way of incorporating it without making it a griefer's paradise.  However, the whole splitting the game into two worlds isn't a good solution, instead they should have certain areas, maybe an entire continent with that style, and these areas would have things unique to them that would reward players for the risk.  Players could choose to participate when they thought themselves ready.  What may seem like tension for some is just a nuisance others don't want, and finding a way to balance it and let players choose is the key to attracting casual players and hardcores alike.

I recall my first experience with UO was horrible.  I started, fought with the interface, someone told me that I'd have to stand in place and hit a practice dummy for hours on end before I could start adventuring, then when I stepped outside the town I was instantly beset on by a gang of thieves who walked right up to me and pickpocketed me, following me for many screens.  When I finally got to the nearby graveyard to try my hand at killing some zombies, someone who was many times more powerful than I killed me and took a special item that I had gotten for trying the game.  That's just not a good experience and no one should have to deal with that crap in a game unless they choose to.  That said, I saw a lot of potential to the game, and even tried it again later, but the magic was gone and I was turned off by how old the featureset and interface was.
8559  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: [PS3] Not yet in production? on: August 19, 2006, 02:47:09 PM
Damn Sony, what the hell have you been up to?

You know, if sony fails, wouldn't it be funny if some other big company like Apple stepped in and made a console?
8560  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Dead Rising impressions! on: August 19, 2006, 05:41:23 AM
So, would it be worth it just to start the game, ignore the plot, and just kill zombies in every way possible in the first run through just to get it, then later focus on story?
Pages: 1 ... 212 213 [214] 215 216 ... 244
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.925 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.154s, 1q)