http://gamingtrend.com
September 27, 2016, 10:30:49 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 41
1081  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Re: Harmony Remote: Buttons reversed on: November 24, 2009, 07:24:34 AM
Reversed in that from time to time it gets out of synch and the off button turns on the TV and the device button turning it off.

But yeah, may try tech support. Was pretty impressed the first time I called them.
1082  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Harmony Remote: Buttons reversed on: November 24, 2009, 07:05:55 AM
So, every once in awhile, the off and device buttons get reversed, with the program guide buttons not doing anything. To get this fixed, I have to go through the help menu and get the remote to turn off the TV. Usually have to do this about once a day, but I have no idea why. Is it something to do with the delay that's currently set on the remote? Anybody run into this problem?
1083  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 23, 2009, 09:07:28 PM

Quote from: Blackjack on November 23, 2009, 01:41:07 PM


As far as the marketing goes, Star Trek D-A-C is a direct tie-in to the summer movie, that's why it gets the little marketing tie-in shtick. STO's not set in the "classic ST era" either (though apparently it will reference a lot of classic stuff). They coulda thrown in a "look for STO in January" marketing card I guess, though who knows if they knew the release date when the Trek DVD packaging was finalized?

STO is their biggest Trek game in years. Same era or not, it's still a Trek game and the movie and MMO share many things in common. They cover the same bases. The game would have benefited from  letting fans of the new movie know that a Star Trek MMO exists, even if it's simply an insert that says it's coming soon. Many Trek fans new or old have no idea it exists. Those of us who are following it closely are only a small percentage. The D-A-C game, tie-in or not is a little piddly thing that many are panning. I think STO would have benefited a LOT more from advertising, so I think it was a big opportunity that was lost.
1084  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 22, 2009, 10:26:58 PM

Quote from: Destructor on November 22, 2009, 10:10:58 PM

No advertisement of STO in Star Trek? Ouch. That seemed like such a shoe-in that to not do it would be just stupid.

Exactly. Probably one of the easiest ways to get the word out to the widest demographic possible, including new fans made after seeing it in the theatre. Can't believe they didn't seize that opportunity. It's not just a ball that was dropped. More like an anvil. They could of had an advertisement that said, "You've seen the movie, now experience it!"

You know what hurts? Instead of STO getting an insert, it was that D-A-C game that did, which I hear is nothing worth writing home about. Not only that, but advertising for an X-Box game while the movie is Blueray, which I know the X-Box can't play. They should fire their marketing team.
1085  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 22, 2009, 09:29:23 PM

Quote from: Destructor on November 22, 2009, 02:31:18 AM

Quote from: Rumpy on November 22, 2009, 12:46:18 AM

As for Beta, I'm sure most of us will have a better chance with the Open Beta.

But like Atomic, I have "Guaranteed Closed Beta Access" to STO. Frankly, it's too bad that they got FAR more 6-month and Lifetime subs than they had slots available for the start of closed beta. I think it would've greatly reduced the ire that a lot of people have with Cryptic right now.

But on the flip side, I have a ton of games to play right now, so maybe it's a good thing.

Yeah, I hear you. They really could have handled things better. When I browse the forums everyday, most of the new threads I see are either people complaining about buying a 6 month or lifetime CO sub and not getting access or people asking if there's going to be a Mac version. Some are even saying they bought the CO subs just to get into the beta.

I think their advertising was misleading. Wether or not it was their purpose to get more people to buy 6 month and lifetime subs, there are tons that believe that buying the subs was a sure thing to get into the beta. And now, they're pretty much saying that people with those subs will get in, even if it means getting in for the last test session just so that they can say they got the people in. That's a slippery slope.

And it makes me wonder if I can trust Cryptic with this franchise. They're developing it, but will they be able to sustain it? There's a gut instinct in me that says they can't. They should of started hyping and advertising by now, even it means just getting people to the website to register. They lost a huge opportunity by not having an insert in JJ's Trek releases. Can't believe Viacom didn't see the opportunity to advertise a sister product in the same franchise like that.

The game's what, 2 or 3 months away from release according to their release date? The game's posed to be delayed at this rate. I realize people say they don't need to test it as much due to the same engine CO's using, but that's only the engine and doesn't take into account the different playstyle of this game, ie the space combat, something that isn't used very much in MMOs.
1086  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Stardock Fumbles the Ball on: November 22, 2009, 08:36:29 PM
This is a shame. From what I can see, the ball was in his court for a long time before he decided to return it. Sometimes the customers really are right. When so many customers make a fuss about something, I'd investigate the source of the fuss and tell everyone I'll get back to them on that and then walk away before saying something that would damage my reputation. When a product is faulty, how can it be the customer's fault? That's like blaming a customer for buying a vacuum that doesn't suck.
1087  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: I request links to red/blue 3D picture/video sites on: November 22, 2009, 09:12:38 AM
Hah yeah, I know what you mean about your eyes feeling weird after using them for a long time.  I think the new 3D tech uses polarization. Polarization just started getting mainstream, though my science center has been doing 3D movies for decades now using polarization.
1088  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: I request links to red/blue 3D picture/video sites on: November 22, 2009, 05:38:56 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ANcspdYh_U

Basically, search Youtube. There are 3D videos on there and Youtube has implemented a number of different 3D viewing modes. The correct term is Anaglyphic, so search youtube for 3D and Anaglyphic videos.

This one's awesome:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axgWP9_p43k

This one's cool too:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wik8wCO-y8

Wow, check out this WoW: Wrath of the Linch King trailer in 3D:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snOHr-H409M
1089  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: American Gladiators.. the movie.... on: November 22, 2009, 05:31:59 AM
Ugh, don't see how this could work. It was an arena show. There are just some franchises you just shouldn't make movies of. What next, Battlebots the movie?
1090  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 22, 2009, 12:46:18 AM
Maybe I'm being nitpicky on this, but I hate how the avatars look to the upper left when they're called up. What is it with that direction? It's like they're looking at a ship in orbit or at the sun.  I wonder if it's a default that will change.

As for Beta, I'm sure most of us will have a better chance with the Open Beta.
1091  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: the New Star Trek- now with impressions and spoilers! on: November 20, 2009, 02:13:00 AM

Quote from: Eel Snave on November 20, 2009, 01:11:25 AM

I'm still torn on the new Star Trek.  I mean, as a movie it's a lot of fun, but as a Star Trek fan, I'm kind of upset.  I always thought that Star Trek was better when it dealt with Important Issues ("In the Pale Moonlight") than when it went balls-to-the-wall action-y.  I dunno, I guess I'm in the minority, but it just didn't feel like Star Trek to me, even though I enjoyed it.

Yep, I agree completely. It was fun, but it was somewhat less filling. I would of wished there'd be more time spent on story. Instead, it seemed secondary and completely ludicrous at best, even for Star Trek. Come on, a star going supernova that quickly? The whole hobus star system felt like a comic book plot.
1092  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: the New Star Trek- now with impressions and spoilers! on: November 19, 2009, 11:48:35 PM
They've screwed up the Gorn now too. Bastards! Tongue

http://trekmovie.com/2009/11/16/exclusive-star-trek-dvd-clip-check-out-the-gorn-and-salt-vampire/
1093  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Star Trek TNG - Wil Wheaton - Memories of the Futurecast on: November 18, 2009, 09:00:09 PM
Awesome. I need to get that book.
1094  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Friggin' Trojans on: November 18, 2009, 07:25:06 AM
lol epic.
1095  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 18, 2009, 12:52:12 AM
New interview about ground combat.

http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/76794

Ironically enough though, I still feel there's not much info on ground combat.  That part is still Meh to me until I see some improved combat footage.

But the best part of that article for me?

Quote
Star clusters are a little bit different, and this is where we try to balance things out. In exploration, there are space maps that have zero combat in them whatsoever, where itís just to go look for scientific anomalies. Then there may be a clue to send you to a planet to find out whatís going on. So there certainly is content that has no combat in it whatsoever.

Ohhh yeah! biggrin
1096  Non-Gaming / Hardware / Software Hell / Re: Best/easiest way to download Youtube videos? on: November 17, 2009, 07:38:23 PM
Found this a few weeks ago and it works really well. Even works with HD videos. I downloaded an HD video and it looked a lot better on my screen compared to Youtube. Best of all, if the videos are in High Quality, they'll download as MP4's with no converting necessary, although the program has conversions to many formats built in, including extracting the audio and making an mp3 file.

http://youtubedownload.altervista.org/
1097  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: I'll take "Unfortunate Acronym" for $200 Alex. on: November 17, 2009, 08:52:57 AM
In Canada, we once had a Reform party, and their plan was to merge with the Conservative party. So then, when they announced the new party as the Canadian Conservative Reform Alliance Party (CCRAP), they were live with the new party name for a few days before they realized their mistake and simply changed it to the Canadian Reform Conservative Alliance, or simply the Alliance.
1098  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: the New Star Trek- now with impressions and spoilers! on: November 16, 2009, 09:57:23 PM

Quote from: Fireball1244 on November 16, 2009, 06:20:57 AM

I liked the helmets. To me, that sort of denial is very Klingon... "our ridges are gone, but we're going to wear these helmets that put them back." I also liked the calm, collected torturer. Some of the coolest Klingons have been at their best when very, very quiet. I can see why they cut the scene, but it does leave a big "What were the Romulans doing for 20 years?" hole in the plot of the movie.

Actually, I quite feel the opposite is true. The Klingons would never try to hide anything, because hiding beneath something would show them as weak. Besides, the TOS Klingons never hid the fact that they were smooth-headed Tongue
1099  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 16, 2009, 09:07:08 AM
Yeah, what's up with those wide corridors. Feels off. Doesn't have a Trek feel.
1100  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Wars: The Old Republic announced on: November 15, 2009, 10:10:32 PM

Quote from: Blackjack on November 06, 2009, 11:25:51 PM

Quote from: Razgon on November 06, 2009, 11:22:59 PM

There's a scooter vehicle of some sort right behind the guy on one of the pictures...that could be something you could own I guess
Hmm, that does look like a Return of the Jedi speeder, doesn't it?  icon_cool

You've given me hope! A New HopeTM Lucasfilm All Rights Reserved Any Expressed Licensing, Endorsement, Product Placement or Merchandising of this trademark is prohibited though it's probably a shame we can't enforce that against George Lucas himself, maybe he'd stop screwing up the film franchise!!

Hate to burst your bubble, but there were a lot of Speeders in the original games, but they were all just props slywink Would love for that to not be the case in this one though.
1101  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 14, 2009, 12:20:07 AM
That's probably the best news yet. It gives me hope that they're actually listening to concerns.
1102  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: British people are ugly on: November 12, 2009, 08:20:16 PM
What are you talking about. Canadian women are HOT! Some of the hottest around.
1103  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: The IP you'd like to see developed into an MMO... on: November 11, 2009, 07:59:12 PM
What about a Dwarf Fortress MMO. Trade with players, become neighbours, and sometimes dwarves migrating to/from other fortresses, so you could probably lose some of your dwarves to other fortresses and encounter them later on. You could also visit other player's fortresses, but not attack them.
1104  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 11, 2009, 06:49:26 PM

Quote from: Destructor on November 10, 2009, 12:56:32 AM

Quote from: Blackjack on November 09, 2009, 06:34:01 PM

TTH has a Q&A with a couple STO devs about the Abilities: (maybe it's just me, but the pages aren't loading very fast for me, fwiw)
http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/76439/

Oh my GOD I want to play this game RIGHT NOW. Reading this shows that the devs really know what they're trying to get into, and that they're trying not to stuff this game into the core MMO 'thinking'. It also sounds like an entirely different game than CO (and dev team for that matter).

The launch date (and for that matter, my guaranteed beta access) can't come soon enough, IMHO.


I have to admit, that does sound pretty impressive. Will have to upgrade before long though after seeing the system requirements.
1105  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: The IP you'd like to see developed into an MMO... on: November 11, 2009, 08:22:22 AM

Quote from: PR_GMR on November 11, 2009, 03:10:27 AM

Quote from: Rumpy on November 11, 2009, 02:36:42 AM

Quote from: PR_GMR on November 11, 2009, 01:34:21 AM

A LEGO MMO.. that would allow you to use the bricks to collectively build cities, space stations, and such.. I love LEGO but don't wish to necessarily collect the bricks. If they could bring the entire LEGO brick-building wholly online, I they would totally have my money! Which reminds me..

http://universe.lego.com/en-us/Default.aspx

HOLY..SHIT! YES! I want this.. I want this NOW!  icon_biggrin

If you thought that was cool, check this out:

http://kotaku.com/gaming/exclusive/the-lego-universe-trailer-271566.php
1106  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Career Help - Is IT doomed? on: November 11, 2009, 05:28:01 AM
Well, my brother graduated  a few years ago with a degree in Computer Engineering, Magna Cum Laude, and he's now working for CSIS: Canadian Security Intelligence Service, the equivalent to the NSA in the US. Got hired right after he came out.  So, is the IT field doomed? Dunno, I think it depends what you shoot for. He loves his job and it's pretty secure in that they can't give it to anyone overseas.
1107  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: The IP you'd like to see developed into an MMO... on: November 11, 2009, 02:36:42 AM

Quote from: PR_GMR on November 11, 2009, 01:34:21 AM

A LEGO MMO.. that would allow you to use the bricks to collectively build cities, space stations, and such.. I love LEGO but don't wish to necessarily collect the bricks. If they could bring the entire LEGO brick-building wholly online, I they would totally have my money! Which reminds me..

http://universe.lego.com/en-us/Default.aspx
1108  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: IP vs. FRANCHISE ... Thread on: November 10, 2009, 10:37:48 PM
Well, the way I see it, franchise for the already established material of multiples and IP for original material, though sometimes they intersect.

In my eyes, WoW is not a franchise. Warcraft is. WoW is part of the Warcraft franchise, but in itself, I see it as an IP, belonging to that franchise.

Star Wars is a franchise. Star Trek is a franchise. Though I wouldn't dare call SWG, SWTOR, or STO a franchise, unless SWTOR and STO spawn sequels.
1109  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: The IP you'd like to see developed into an MMO... on: November 10, 2009, 10:29:15 PM
Dune. It's got it all. Planets, Houses, Alliances, backstory. One of the few franchises that doesn't need much tinkering to make it a viable MMO property.
1110  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: What is it about movie comedians getting stale? on: November 10, 2009, 10:09:32 PM

Quote from: Toe on November 10, 2009, 08:23:25 PM

Quote from: Rumpy on November 10, 2009, 07:47:29 PM

Seems like comedy is both easy and hard to make. Easy in that you can put a really low budget comedy together and watch the money pouring in, and hard to make a good smart comedy that will make a lasting impression like The Jerk or even Scent of a Woman.

Scent of a Woman was a good smart comedy??  saywhat

Well yeah. It will brilliant in every way. Love the classic Ferrari blind driving scene.
1111  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: What is it about movie comedians getting stale? on: November 10, 2009, 07:47:29 PM

Quote from: jament on November 10, 2009, 04:02:25 PM

Some of those comedians are also victims of changes in society.

I don't think that movies like "The Jerk" or "Blazing Saddles" would get made today.  You can have all the fart jokes and drugs and sex you want in a movie but when you start lampooning the intelligence of society and class and race, studios won't take that chance.  A lot of those comedians were funny because of their edginess but those roles aren't out there any more.

Exactly. Seems to me that a lot of the soul behind comedy is gone, and I don't think it's a generational thing either. A lot of the movies these days seem to rely on fart and poop jokes, or anything really disgusting. It's one reason why I don't watch teen movies. The industry itself doesn't seem creative, and instead grabbing any actors that are out of work and willing to make a quick buck, translating to a cheap movie for a studio to make. Otherwise, why do we have the likes of Larry the Cable Guy?

Seems like comedy is both easy and hard to make. Easy in that you can put a really low budget comedy together and watch the money pouring in, and hard to make a good smart comedy that will make a lasting impression like The Jerk or even Scent of a Woman. I know the industry likes to grade actors based on how much they make and how bankable they are, with D actors basically being washouts and has-beens. I'd like to think that Steve Martin is now a D who was once an A or even a AA.
1112  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Progressive Girl & Glade Girl on: November 08, 2009, 08:11:10 PM
For me, it's the kraft girl.
1113  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: What is it about movie comedians getting stale? on: November 07, 2009, 08:49:34 AM
The thing is, I think comedians should branch out more and try something out of their comfort zone. I like Robin Williams for doing that, as it kept him fresh and interesting, as you never knew what kind of character he'd play or even how he'd play him. It made him grow overall as an actor, and I think we can all appreciate that. That's a mark of a good actor; one who's flexible in what he plays. If more comedians did that, they'd experience some growth that comedy alone wouldn't be able to offer. Same with Dustin Hoffman or Richard Dreyfuss. They've all done comedies, but they also have their serious roles. You see very little of that in the current crop of comedians. All they know is being funny. Would it kill them to branch out?

As for TV stars, well, Micheal J. Fox actually started out on TV, went into movies and came back to TV. I guess you could say he never left being a TV star.

Heh, we have a TV show in Canada called This Hour has 22 minutes. slywink
1114  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 06, 2009, 07:28:32 PM
Well, someone's breaking the NDA..  icon_confused
1115  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 06, 2009, 08:15:59 AM

Quote from: Blackjack on November 06, 2009, 03:51:19 AM

Dunno if anyone pointed this out earlier, but Eurogamer claims that Atari's set Feb. 2, 2010, as STO's North American release, and Feb. 5 as the European release. Is setting a "hard" date at this point a bad idea (meaning if the game is still in bug-fest mode Feb. 2, it's still releasing), or does it give them something to shoot for? It does give the angry "Why aren't I in closed STO beta yet!!!" mobs a vague idea of when the closed beta would end I guess.

Star Trek Online out in February
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/star-trek-online-out-in-february
Quote
Cryptic and Atari have confirmed that their MMO Star Trek Online will be released for PC on 2nd February 2010 in North America, and 5th February in Europe.
fwiw, I'm a little leery of vague articles with no attribution (as far as a person/source), and no official announcement.  icon_neutral

Was browsing their forum earlier today and there was a thread about it. Someone asked one of the reps in chat:

Quote
[22:34] <Cryptic_Stormshade> As far as I know (and I know) we haven't announced anything of that sort yet.

And in yet another thread about it, the same rep goes on to say:

Quote
No one has missed anything.

When we confirm our launch date, I assure you, that you will find that information here before anyone else.

Thanks,

Stormshade
1116  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Why do I need to defend purchasing music? on: November 05, 2009, 10:56:06 PM

Quote from: Isgrimnur on November 05, 2009, 08:29:46 PM

Quote from: Fireball1244 on November 05, 2009, 08:06:03 PM

Quote from: deadzone on November 05, 2009, 07:00:59 PM

True story:  the one time I ever went hog wild and downloaded everything I could get my hands on was with MP3.com.  It was cheap, easy to use, and they had a humongous selection.

It was also 100% illegal, and no artist got one red cent from what you paid, but you don't seem particularly concerned about such things.

You're off base on this one.  

Quote from: Wiki
The vast majority of content on MP3.com was posted by unsigned or independent musicians and producers. Many of these artists worked in the then emerging forms of electronic music, including ambient, trance, drum n' bass, and various types of house music. One of their most high profile releases was a song/score soundtrack for the film Three Kings which was otherwise unreleased. It was made available as a packaged CD with video interviews with Ice Cube.

At the end of 1999, MP3.com launched a promotion called "Pay for Play," or P4P, involving an algorithm to pay each MP3.com artist on the basis of the number of streams and downloads of their songs.

I own a CD from an artist that released an album through MP3.com.  

One of the first bands I remember from the MP3.com era was Carbon Leaf. This was before they were big and before CNET owned the site when they changed to a more commercial spotlight.
1117  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Star Trek Online (Cryptic's "other" new MMO) on: November 05, 2009, 08:37:14 PM

Quote from: Aganazer on November 05, 2009, 02:22:35 PM

The number one thing I'd like to know about STO is about non-combat activities. All the released info is about combat. What else is there? The Star Trek TV shows and movies have always only been about 25% combat and the rest being about other stuff like science, exploring, and diplomacy. My biggest issue with Champions is that there is nothing else to do besides beating things up.

Yeah, me too. Sadly, it seems like they're thinking more about combat than exploration, which leaves me feeling empty. I would think part of the fun of a Star Trek MMO would be exploring, both new and established systems.
1118  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Why do I need to defend purchasing music? on: November 05, 2009, 08:00:20 PM
I buy all my music on CDs.
1119  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [trailer]Sherlock Holmes on: November 05, 2009, 07:55:11 PM
Well damn. When I go to that link, it gives me a choice of either the American or Canadian site. If I go to the American site, it tells me I can't watch it. If I go to the Canadian site, it doesn't have the same content.

Edit: Well go figure. It works today.
1120  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: What is it about movie comedians getting stale? on: November 05, 2009, 07:12:55 PM
They tend to get worse scripts as they get older, I find. And they get less and less picky of the work they do as long as it brings them money.  I mean, look at Steve Martin. When was the last time he actually did anything decent? The Jerk was brilliant. Probably the best he's done. The Parenthood movies were good too. But recently, the Dirty Dozen movies and the Pink Panther remakes? Lousy. Comedy's an art form, and another aspect is that it seems Hollywood has lost their touch with the art. Now it's just stupid all the time. Where are the smart comedies? You can only have so much shit, puke, and fart jokes. A lot of the comedies out these days are stupid teen comedies that have no substance to them, and the actors are just so quick to cash in.

And I feel for the actors who have gotten into comedy recently. What they've gotten into is rarely funny.  Look at that Rotten Tomatoes list of 100 worst movies. Most of them are comedies. Ben Stiller and Will Ferrell for example have had a few movies you could call genuinely good, but the rest are forgettable, mostly caused by bad scripts and bad concepts instead of just being clever. The concepts themselves are tired.

Shit man, we need another Mel Brooks to come along and turn these frowns into grins.
Pages: 1 ... 26 27 [28] 29 30 ... 41
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 1.798 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.254s, 1q)