http://gamingtrend.com
August 02, 2014, 12:54:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 81
121  Gaming / Portable Gaming & Apps / Re: Civilization Revolution 2 Reased for Ipad...and apparently nobody knew... on: July 03, 2014, 02:56:55 AM
Pocket Tactics says it's just a graphics update, game play is the same. They will have a review up tomorrow. Sounds like I will skip it from what I have seen posted about it in various places.
122  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: I had a pretty sad encounter today at Rite Aid on: July 03, 2014, 02:35:30 AM
Yikes, but I can't say I am surprised, I have seen that kind of attitude as well. I was a supervisor in a place that was mostly white but there was only one black guy. This guy kept a little notebook in his pocket so he could record any racist incidents. My name was written in it because everyone was sitting around, and I told him to take out the trash. In his eyes I was racist because I picked him instead of all the others sitting around. He refused to do it as well. In reality I picked him because he had been the least helpful that week (also the biggest pain in my ass). Learned a lot about supervising that day.

Glad to hear at least the people around you backed you up. Sounds like the guy was delusional.
123  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Re: World Cup 2014 on: July 01, 2014, 07:26:32 PM

Quote from: Roguetad on July 01, 2014, 04:45:35 PM

Quote from: Lee on July 01, 2014, 02:57:57 PM

FIFA is against changes unless they can make money off of it.
Don't you think they would make a boat load of money off in game televised advertising?  I hope it never goes in that direction, but I think in game advertising would be much more profitable than adboards at the stadium.

It's so weird as an American trying to understand that there is an entity (FIFA) bigger than the commerical enterprise of a league.  In my mind the Premier League, like the NFL or NBA, should be able to do whatever they want in the interest of their league and sport.  But all of the pro leagues are overseen by FIFA?      

Good point, if FIFA can profit of of ads then it wouldn't be surprising if they are coming. I think there would be quite a bit of backlash though. People were already disgusted with the cool down break ads from what I saw on Twitter and a couple of blogs. FIFA seems to be against any change though, for instance there has been lots of calls to be able to take 30 seconds to review calls and they won't do that. Goal line technology has been around for years and they were reluctant to even adopt that until now. They want to keep the human element to the game.

I believe the structure is FIFA, from there it breaks it down into regions like UEFA, CONCACAF, etc, then to each country's football associations (FA), and then the leagues themselves. The big european leagues threaten to break away from FIFA every few years or to make their own super league but I think there is just too much money involved in it and it would create other problems. Having a governing body is good in that it helps organize all the international cups, tournaments, etc. If the leagues were in charge they wouldn't let their players play in international duty for instance, so it good having something like FIFA providing the rules.

I think the difference between US sports and soccer is that US sports don't compete at a world level so it works for them. In soccer there are just too many competitions between all the countries on a country and club levels so a governing body is need. On international level you have WC every 4 years plus all the qualifying for that. Each continent has a cup, such as the Euros or African Cup of Nations that occur every 1-4 years. Then you have your World Club Cup, Champions League, and then all the tournaments for each countries FA. Arsenal for instance are involved in 4 competitions each season, plus letting their players go off to play what ever international competitions are going on. In other words, it's complicated.  icon_smile
124  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Re: World Cup 2014 on: July 01, 2014, 02:57:57 PM

Quote from: Canuck on July 01, 2014, 12:27:15 PM

I wonder if having the time stop every time the whistle is blow would help get rid of these delays. Of course that would make the game a lot longer. They could reduce the halves to 30 minutes to offset that.

NO! I keep hearing this from what I assume are people who don't watch soccer much. The game works fine as is, stopping the clock would kill the flow of the game and introduce tv ads to the game (although there is fear that is already happening with the cool down breaks). The clock does stop, the ref keeps the official clock and stops it for long pauses. The 45 minute haves work fine as is. Luckily there is no chance of this happening. FIFA is against changes unless they can make money off of it.
125  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 on: July 01, 2014, 05:52:04 AM

Quote from: leo8877 on July 01, 2014, 01:56:12 AM

Quote from: Roguetad on June 30, 2014, 07:32:58 PM

That said, I hate all of the flopping, fake injuries, and pretend head bumps.  It's insane.  They look like idiots.           

Seriously, soccer players are the biggest pussies of all time.  I've been into this world cup, but it's painful to watch sometimes. 


Oh come on. I admit most of it is pretty embarrassing, but usually it is just to get fouls/cards/influence the refs and/or time waste. Unfortunately it works, so they do it. Nothing to do with being a "pussy". I can also say having played when I was kid and seeing some of the pictures over the years of the injuries the pros get, some of it does hurt like hell. American's like to think it's not a contact sport, but it is. I have seen players get gashes in their head stapled on the sidelines and go back in and play.

It certainly makes the sport look bad, I do agree, but if you watch enough of of it you get used to it. When Arsenal players do it, I am scared that it may be a real injury. When opponents do it I am cursing them for diving/over exaggerating. It's all just part of the game.
126  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 on: June 30, 2014, 09:59:00 PM

Quote from: Roguetad on June 30, 2014, 07:32:58 PM

That said, I hate all of the flopping, fake injuries, and pretend head bumps.  It's insane.  They look like idiots.           

That seems harsh. Maybe I am so used to it I don't notice it anymore? Outside of the usuals offenders like Robben and Ronaldo I don't think it's been bad at all. In fact it seems much more physical than the WC usually is. We have seen a broken arm, a couple of black eyes, cleats dragged across shins, and collisions that caused bloodshed on more than one occasion.

So many great games so far, this has been the best WC I remember ,and I haven't missed one since 1986.
127  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Transformers 4: Age of Extinction on: June 27, 2014, 09:24:19 PM

Quote from: hepcat on June 27, 2014, 07:03:22 PM

Quote from: Lee on June 27, 2014, 09:26:13 AM

Side note, $14 for a popcorn and large drink??? I can't believe how expensive it is to go to the movies nowadays.

Expensive???  Try watching a film here in Chicago.  I had to prostitute myself in the alley behind the theater to get money for a medium sprite. 

...and by prostitute I mean threaten to take off my shirt if they didn't pay me. 

Speaking of horrible experiences, I refuse to pay for any movie featuring the Walhberg.  My hatred of that schmuck knows no limit.

I think for 3 of us the whole night was about $80. Maybe $25/person for 3 hours of "entertainment" isn't bad? How much would it be in Chicago if everyone ordered a snack and drink as well? Luckily we didn't do dinner first or I would be eating ramen for the rest of the week. :-)
128  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Transformers 4: Age of Extinction on: June 27, 2014, 09:14:57 PM

Quote from: Caine on June 27, 2014, 08:07:36 PM

I've heard that the product placement in this one is taken to a whole new level of in-your-face douchebaggery and that they don't even try justifying showing half of the crap they're shilling.

Maybe I am immune to it, but I only noticed it once where it was really blatantly over the top. Something is traveling down the road at a high rate of speed and there just so happens to be a Bud Light truck going right through the intersection. It's done in a way so the truck stands out so that your eyes go right to it. The thing hits the truck spreading aluminum bottles of Bud Light everywhere. A character opens one, takes a swig and says yet another cheesy line. Outside of that, I don't remember anything other than the normal stuff like you can clearly see a character wearing Oakleys, etc.
129  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Transformers 4: Age of Extinction on: June 27, 2014, 10:51:54 AM
No. slywink The first was bad, but I remember enjoying the special effects/action for what they were. The second one I don't really remember. Didn't see the third (I actually thought this one was the third). Admittedly I am a movie snob and this was very far from the kind of movie I enjoy.

It did seem like it fell flat with the audience as well. Lots of little one liners throughout the movie that got lots of laughs at first, but less so as the movie went on (one character in particular gets increasingly silly as it progresses). The same few people who laughed throughout cheered at the end, but that was only maybe 6 people in an almost full theater. It was a late showing, but by the 2 hour mark the audience seemed very restless. Although, initial audience reaction online seems good so far.
130  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: [movie] Transformers 4: Age of Extinction on: June 27, 2014, 09:26:13 AM
Just got back from seeing it (wasn't by choice) and it was pretty bad. I figured that at least the action sequences would be good so that the three hours would go by a little easier. Nope. Mostly they just show a robot dodging or getting hit by crap, then skip to something blowing up. Throw in a couple of car chases for good measure. The movie could have been 30 minutes shorter if all the slow motion shots were in real time. The script was embarrassing it was so bad. The soundtrack...I'm old I am guess, but it was painful. Most of the special effects were good though. That's about all I can say. Not sure why Michael Bay is given money to make stuff like this.

Side note, $14 for a popcorn and large drink??? I can't believe how expensive it is to go to the movies nowadays.
131  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 on: June 26, 2014, 06:40:49 PM

Quote from: Caine on June 26, 2014, 04:28:08 PM

Quote from: leo8877 on June 26, 2014, 03:06:39 PM

Quote from: Isgrimnur on June 26, 2014, 02:59:34 PM

Suarez out for 9 games and four months for his third career bite attack on an opposing player.

Seems kind of lenient for a 3rd offense and at the World Cup of all things.
Agreed.  He should be banned from the sport.  No place for that kind of aggression in sports. 

I know soccer is thought of as a non-contact sport for some reason in the US, but have you seen the stomping, elbows, cleats up tackles, and portentional leg breaking challenges that often don't get much more than a yellow? There are many players known for this kind of behavior. A lifetime ban would be way out of wack for something that is stupid, but not really that dangerous. Suarez's racial abuse last year was worse than this.

US did not look good today, pretty sloppy and just didn't do much, but it was against a really good German side. Going to watch Belguim today and pay closer attention to who we are up against.
132  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 on: June 26, 2014, 03:43:12 PM
Seems about right to me. Biting is odd and silly, but a lot worse stuff goes on than that and gets little punishment.

Urequay and Liverpool fans are pissed! Twitter is highly amusing this morning. Supposedly he's off to Barcelona and this ban will not affect that.
133  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 on: June 26, 2014, 02:56:53 PM
Reports I read that the stadium is flooding, but the pitch is fine and will go on.
134  Gaming / Portable Gaming & Apps / Re: iPhone/iTouch app and game thread on: June 26, 2014, 12:23:47 AM
I have been playing 99 Bricks Wizardy Academy a lot. It's Tetris without the walls to hold it together so you need to really pay attention to getting everything intergrated and not leaving too many empty spots. You do have to grind a bit for the power ups and the controls can be awkward, but it's a lot if fun. If you like Tetris, you will like this.
135  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: First CK, now MO? on: June 25, 2014, 02:08:40 AM
Like I said, it's better to just go quietly. Good luck Arc.
136  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 24, 2014, 11:33:20 PM
I am not offended by the name Redskins one bit. The difference seems to be that I understand why some people would be.
137  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 on: June 24, 2014, 11:31:19 PM
We get better Premier League coverage in the US than they do in England, so it's very easy to follow as long as you are wiling to wake up early weekend mornings (much worse if you are on the West Coast, early games start at 0445 PST). NBC shows every live game they can fit into their multiple channels and the games that aren't on one of the NBC networks are streamed online or on On-Demand. The last day of the league when all 10 games are played at the exact same time they had every game on TV live. Heck, we get better coverage of the Premier League than we do of the MLS.

I just can't get into the MLS, I keep trying to become a Sounders fan and went to a few Rapids games when I lived in WY, but there is just something about it that I can't get into.

LaLiga can be fun, but usually consists of two teams that make a lot more money than the others and they battle it out year after year. Well, except this year when a Atletico Madrid won the league and almost won the Champions League. I don't really follow the league because I have to pay extra to get the channels that show it, and just following the Premier League is already too much soccer to watch. Spain tends to get the best players in the world because Barcelona and Real Madrid are willing to spend millions.

Serie A is the Italian league. I used to follow it, but now it too is on channels I would have to pay extra for. Italian football tends to be very defensive, probing play. They think of it as a game of chess so a lot of people find it too slow.

Bundesliga is the German league, and seems to be pretty exciting, lots of rivalries, big name players (but most of the big names go to Spain or England), and really amazing fans. Again though, you usually have to pay extra for the channels that show it (BeIn Sports and Gol TV).

Champions League would be the best to watch if you don't want to dedicate too much time to it. That's like a best of Europe competition where the top teams from all the leagues compete. Makes for interesting games. Its usually on Tuesdays and Wednesdays afternoons though so can be hard to watch.

My advice would be to watch some Premier League games and see how you like it. It seems like there are guides almost every year for deciding who you should support on websites like ESPN as well. Be prepared though, there are still a lot of boring games, even when the big teams meet up, because often times they are so scared of losing to a rival they will play very defensively. Then other times those rivalries are so strong that they will do anything to win (Arsenal v Tottenham for example is almost always an exciting game).
138  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 24, 2014, 07:58:18 PM

Quote from: hepcat on June 24, 2014, 07:46:11 PM

Oh, and if Snyder loved the name so much, why did he ditch it when FedEx offered him a boatload of cash to change their stadium's name? 

This is why I really don't care about this whole thing. The fans can scream about their 80 years of tradition, which I very much understand, but everything is for sale in pro sports. The team could move and change their name tomorrow if it suited them financially. For the league and owners this is about money, not tradition.
139  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 24, 2014, 07:08:56 PM

Quote from: hepcat on June 24, 2014, 06:43:22 PM

You must not be a fan of Tandori chicken then.  

The problem I've encountered at two different Pakistani places is the amount of spices they use.  It's about two to three times more than I've ever had at an Indian restaurant.  

Have you ever had southern Indian vegetarian food?  Especially a crepe like dish called a Dosa?  Good lord, you'll think you died and went to heaven.

Funny you mention that, they had crepes at the place I was at Sunday, almost ordered one of them for something different and decided against it.  Will have to try it next time.
140  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 24, 2014, 06:33:47 PM
Did it taste too spicy? Different than usual? Or was the sauce off?

You lost me on Butter chicken, everyone I know loves it, but it's far to bland IMO. Give me a good vindaloo or madras please.
141  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 24, 2014, 06:19:30 PM

Quote from: hepcat on June 24, 2014, 06:14:57 PM

Quote from: Caine on June 24, 2014, 06:12:54 PM

Indian Tacos, if we are talking East Indian, would surely cause my bowels to simply give up and leave the body in search of a less hostile environment.

If we're talking Pakistani, yes.  Northern Indian might be okay.  

But man, Pakistani food uses spices that could cause a corpse to spontaneously come alive and say, "No thanks!".

Really? In my experience they are basically the same as far as spices, but can't say I pay much attention. Had Indian the last two nights, it never does anything to my stomach. I grew up with spicy food, so maybe that's why?
142  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 24, 2014, 05:12:48 PM
You better watch it Hepcat, when Zeke snaps like this he likes to threaten to come to your house to beat you up. I don't envy you, I have been in that situation a couple if times with him. Couldn't leave the house for weeks.
143  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: First CK, now MO? on: June 24, 2014, 05:09:36 PM

Quote from: Arclight on June 24, 2014, 03:46:39 PM

Hey Ceekay, I bet dollars to do-nuts you're having a laugh at all of this "speculation"  Tongue

I've been around since Gone Gold's hey-day. What I've seen over the years is, the core group
of die-hards here are very picky about who they let "join" their online shenanigans.
I've felt it numerous times. You make a post that one of the "inner" group doesn't like
and now you're arguing with 3 or 4 others who carte-blanc  take the other guys side.

This is just an observation that might be an answer to why some just leave and say nothing.

Calling BS on this as someone who was also involved since GG's heyday. The die-hards didn't deny anything. Some people didn't fit in, said something stupid and got called on it, or failed to post something of interest, so they never got comfortable or felt like they were getting the attention they deserved. Something I have been trying to learn myself, is that if I am not fitting in with a group, be it work, social, or online, I need to look at how I acted and not look to blame it on others.

There is nothing wrong with realizing you don't fit in and moving on quietly. CK did it the right way (and we know he is fine). Just don't leave with a pathetic, attention seeking, explosion (which I am guilty of), it just makes you look silly. Look at yourself and try not to blame the other forum members because you didn't fit in.
144  Gaming / Portable Gaming & Apps / Re: [iOS] Cool June releases on: June 23, 2014, 10:39:06 PM
Interesting, and thanks for the impressions.

148apps panned Plundernauts, so I avoided it. Not surprised on the reviews not mentioning the horrible mechanics, people seem to like pay to play games in the App Store, at least the ones who write reviews. (Or they're fake reviews.)

OTTTD sounded interesting but I wrote it off because in the App Store instead of just giving us screenshots, they post pictures of characters with word bubbles in front of a tiny screenshot of the game. While that usually isn't enough to tell me not to bother with a game, it doesn't work in their favor if I am on the fence about a game. Show me your game, not marketing blurbs! Now I am intrigued though and might pull the trigger next time I want a new game. Thanks.
145  Gaming / Portable Gaming & Apps / Re: iPhone/iTouch app and game thread on: June 23, 2014, 08:51:19 PM
I guess they added IAP for units in the first one, and that is a "premium" game at $10 (well $3 as of today). It's also not a Firaxis game. Don't have a good feeling about this one.

Edit: never mind it does have Firaxis symbol on its banner ad, but at a Pocket Tactics mentions, the press release doesn't mention Firaxis.
146  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 23, 2014, 04:14:57 PM
I would love a nice, boring 0-0 match on Thursday. Leave the exciting games for the teams I don't care about. In other words every other team except these two.
147  Gaming / Portable Gaming & Apps / Re: iPhone/iTouch app and game thread on: June 23, 2014, 04:07:46 PM
I need to know the pricing system before I can even remotely get excited for this.
148  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 23, 2014, 09:25:43 AM

Quote from: Zinfan on June 23, 2014, 05:13:16 AM

I'd love to root for the U.S. side but they turtle up every time they are tied.  They looked very chippy when down 1 but after the equalizer goal they turn off and wait for the clock to run out, maybe good strategy but boring to watch.  Bradley in the center looked poor on more than one occasion but the one that counted he looked to give that ball to Portugal on a platter.

That's just about every side, ever, you can't knock the US for trying to kill time by holding the ball up. (Edit: I meant that's every underdog side. They were playing it safe, it wasn't a knockout game. Still I don't think they played that reserved at 1-1 in the game.)

Also thought Bradley did good, he was trying. Yeah he made some mistakes, especially that last one, but I liked his effort. Just that ending...ugh. Exciting game at least.
149  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 21, 2014, 09:07:36 PM
Disgusted with Germany right now. US better win tomorrow.
150  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 21, 2014, 06:33:31 PM
Yep, that was before Messi's goal, which was beautiful. Too bad they waited so long. Credit to Iran for almost making it past the favorites.

Ready for the next game, should be fun. Going to miss the last game of the day unfortunately, but I am ok with that (don't care about either team).
151  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 21, 2014, 05:30:03 PM
I would feel better about it if we looked a bit stronger against Ghana. We spent a lot of time on the defensive so if we give Ronaldo too many chances, he'll eventually get a couple. Still it's possible, would love to see it, just don't have a lot of hope.

I wish this game would end, very boring. Argentina look very lackluster.
152  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 21, 2014, 05:09:39 PM
You really think we will beat Portugal?
153  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Amazon's new product: Holographic 3D Phone? on: June 20, 2014, 10:06:11 PM
So I assume you can aside load the Google Play store apps on this phone, but what about the Google Apps? Google Maps, GMail, Drive, Now (whatever it's called now), etc, are those all impossible to get? Are you stuck with Amazon's maps?
154  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Redskins Lose Trademark on: June 20, 2014, 09:55:04 PM

Quote from: Zekester on June 20, 2014, 09:32:49 PM

What the hell does that have to do with the subject?

Try reading other people's posts, then you might understand what it has to do with the subject.
155  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 20, 2014, 09:51:39 PM
I think it's because France is that good. Last WC they had a manager the players weren't behind and all the egos got out of control. It was a disaster despite all the great players they had. This year they seemed to have gotten it together and are playing like a team. Plus they left baggage like Nasri behind.

The Swiss weren't very good though. Their CBs were both old Arsenal rejects, and I was sad to see they pretty much got ran over and their goalkeeper sucked. Still the Swiss came back late on, but it was too little too late (I missed it, I had to step out at the end).
156  Gaming / Portable Gaming & Apps / Re: iPhone/iTouch app and game thread on: June 20, 2014, 08:52:27 PM
Why is Fish out of Water an editors choice? It's old and wasn't very good. Has it improved?
157  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 20, 2014, 07:49:39 PM
My French man-crush Giroud is looking amazing. France easily running away with this one.
158  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Amazon's new product: Holographic 3D Phone? on: June 20, 2014, 06:53:50 PM
I would never switch, I love my iPhone, but I do like looking at the Android phones and figuring out what I would get if I ever did switch. Every Galaxy owner I have talked to says the phone is the perfect size, but it seems huge to me. Yet the smaller phones also seem to be lesser phones. Is there a cutting edge Android phone that isn't huge? I think I would be lost in the sea of choices if I ever did switch.
159  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 20, 2014, 06:36:25 PM
Its all about if they can shut down Ronaldo. Watching Portugal, they seem to be a one man team. Don't get me wrong, they are good, but they aren't unbeatable, especially if Ronaldo is off his game or they can contain him. I think we have a chance, but it's going to be tough and I am not sure our back four is strong enough from what I have seen. It's all bout Tim Howard, we need him to be amazing.
160  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: World Cup 2014 - Man have Spain, England and Italy Sucked! on: June 20, 2014, 06:31:48 PM
Watched every game. Being unemployed is awesome this time of year!

Very glad to see England out of it. I know their team very well since I watch Premier League a lot, so I already despise most of the players on the team (basically I only like Arsenal players). Worse are the British press and fans who act like England is so good, and the US is so bad. For instance, I was listening to an Apple tech podcast this week, where neither the American or the Brit on it follows soccer, yet they were both talking about how bad the US team is and as if the England team was some how much better. Just like four years ago (that was a miserable cup I am glad to forget) when England played the US and all the talk up to the game was about how the US was just a nobody team England would beat easily. So good riddance to them.

Oh, and the thought of Liverpool fans imploding when their star player (Suarez) knocked England out of it, it brings me to giggles.

Spain also happy to see go, they have been dominating for too long. Holland look good, but they have Van Persie so need to lose. Italy have looked like nothing special. Brazil are the favorites, but they really don't look that great. I can see them getting knocked out unless they pick it up a bit.

This looks to be all about CONCACAF. Germany and US are my teams...both still in it and Germany look good.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 81
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.137 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.04s, 1q)