|
4443
|
Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Best Game of All Time Round 2
|
on: November 01, 2004, 01:15:13 AM
|
|
To the left, to the left:
No vote No vote Wing Commander 3 Ultima VII Thief: The Dark Project Half-Life No vote Wing Commander The Secret of Monkey Island No vote Quake 3 Pharaoh Outlaws Diablo No One Lives Forever Ultima Underworld
To the right, to the right:
Freespace 2 Unreal Tournament 2004 The Longest Journey System Shock 2 Diablo 2 Quake No vote Grim Fandango Rollercoaster Tycoon Starcraft Command & Conquer Red Alert 2 Knights of the Old Republic Gabriel Knight 2 Deus Ex No vote Starsiege: Tribes
|
|
|
|
|
4444
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Anyone know much about Aropax anxiety medicine?
|
on: October 31, 2004, 11:54:09 PM
|
I got off SSRIs once and for all this summer - since I started on Zoloft (and later switching to Lexapro), I packed on the pounds.... my doctor swore that it was due to my diet and aging, but ever since I stopped I've lost a good 15 pounds or so. I started taking Zoloft because I was basically turning into a hypochondriac (after seeing several family members die of cancer, it was a constant worry)... but I also had a bit of the social anxiety thing going on as well. It helped with the fear of cancer, but never really did anything for dealing with other people - I never felt like the "life of the party" or anything like that. I don't really need it anymore, thankfully... ironically my fears of getting cancer were well justified, but now that I've actually gone through the experience of cancer and chemotherapy, I don't worry about it nearly as much anymore (funny how that works). So I weaned myself off the Lexapro this year, after talking to my doctor. These days my "lows" tend to be lower, but it's nothing I can't handle. Losing the weight I put on with the SSRIs is definitely worth it (it's better to look good than to feel good  ) I don't know if this helps any - just relating my experience. 
|
|
|
|
|
4453
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / New Tupac Album This Year, Petition For Original Recordings
|
on: October 28, 2004, 03:10:16 AM
|
I'm just questioning the sort of environment you guys are expecting here, I suppose I was just assuming we were all working towards a mature message board that frowns on moronic threads and posts that add absolutely no insight to the subject.
Tell me then so I can get this straight: I can go into every thread if I feel like it, and just say "fuck [the topic]" randomly at will? If thats the case fine, I'll lower my expectations when making a thread, understanding that there is infact no level of maturity or quality required, and I'll act the same if I feel like being an asshole. I don't very much like GTA: San Andreas, I'm gonna go into all the threads posted on it and reply "fuck GTA: San Andreas"... (not really going to do it but I suppose I could without breaking the rules?) That would really attract intelligent discussions or even members from development teams, wouldn't it?
:Sigh: I guess I just had my own lofty expectations coming from GoneGold. 
|
|
|
|
|
4456
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Greatest Rock n' Roll Frontman
|
on: October 27, 2004, 04:14:26 PM
|
Who do folks here think was/is the greatest, most entertaining lead singer of a rock band? For me, even in a field that has Robert Plant, Roger Daltrey, Mick Jagger, there can be only one:
Freddie Mercury Good call. Whatever that current commercial is that uses "I Want To Break Free" has got me listening to Queen again - particularly their live shows - and he is a brilliant frontman. His musical/vocal talent and undeniable showmanship just put him a notch above just about everyone else.
|
|
|
|
|
4457
|
Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / GTA: SA Impressions
|
on: October 27, 2004, 02:59:11 PM
|
Are you F#$%ing kidding me ???? !!!!
No, Halo sucked, both on the XBox and the PC.. This from the guy that also hates KOTOR, another well-loved game What were you saying about counter-culture backlash, again? Edit: Devil beat me to it - nice to know I'm not the only one seeing the contradiction. Anyway, to stay on topic... I really have no interest in GTA:SA - the previous games were mildly entertaining, but I never got into them like everyone else. So I'll take a pass, go back to the Xbox double pack and see if I can figure out what I'm missing 
|
|
|
|
|
4459
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: My New Car
|
on: October 26, 2004, 02:08:44 PM
|
Toyota Avensis!  Too bad you can't get it in North America!  Europe and Japan only for this bad boy. (Thank God for small miracles) I mean, congrats! 
|
|
|
|
|
4460
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Anyone else vote yet?
|
on: October 26, 2004, 12:46:49 PM
|
|
Yep, I voted this past Saturday - went really quickly, actually. I was probably in there all of ten minutes, and that was including an address change.
|
|
|
|
|
4461
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Top Ten Geekiest hobbies
|
on: October 25, 2004, 11:21:13 PM
|
7. Star Wars
Distinguishing Characteristics: Overweight, casually strolling into the center of the room, and then when you least expect it, bursting into a blinding Jedi combat storm with a golf ball retriever. Ghyslain Raza, where are you in our time of need?
|
|
|
|
|
4463
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / [Dating] Frequency of calls early on?
|
on: October 25, 2004, 06:53:19 PM
|
You'd think at 32 I'd have this stuff down, but the majority of my dating life prior to this year has been with girls I already knew well - friends, friends of friends, etc... people I already had a rapport with. But this year I've been dating a lot of people that I barely know, which makes calling them up a bit tricky - particularly at the very beginning. Once you've gone out with someone and said "yeah, I'd like to pursue this", how often should you call? Of course the trick is calling often enough to show interest, without calling so often that you come off as clingy.... I'm just not sure where that line is - calls would be as far apart as possible in my perfect world, as I hate using the telephone, but chicks like to, y'know, TALK and crap like that... Thoughts from the peanut gallery? (And Matrix (if you're around), just shut yer word hole - I know what your answer is :twisted: )
|
|
|
|
|
4466
|
Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Best Game Of All Time Tournament - CG Edition
|
on: October 23, 2004, 03:53:06 AM
|
|
NA NA NA NA Wing Commander 3 NA NA Ultima VII Thief: The Dark Project Sam & Max Hit the Road Doom Half-Life NA Lands of Lore Wing Commander Warcraft II The Secret of Monkey Island 2 NA Tomb Raider Quake 2 Doom 2 Quake 3 Call of Duty NA Outlaws NA Ultima IV Diablo No One Lives Forever Magic Carpet Ultima Underworld Might and Magic 6
|
|
|
|
|
4467
|
Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / November 2004 - greatest game rush ... ever?
|
on: October 22, 2004, 05:38:24 PM
|
|
Thankfully, a lot on that list don't really appeal to me.
Preordered: MoH:PA Halo 2
Will buy: Half-Life 2 Call of Duty Finest Hour
Might buy: Prince of Persia - Warrior Within Goldeneye Metroid Prime 2 Pirates Killzone
Everything else gets a pass.
|
|
|
|
|
4470
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Thinking of buying an Apple computer
|
on: October 20, 2004, 11:10:38 PM
|
Is it an external hard drive? Because, yeah, a Mac can read an external Windows formatted hard drive (at least, in my experience). Of course, the system disk has to be HFS+. Macs can't write to NTFS drives (unless something has changed). So, if you want your external drive to be read/writable by both OSX and Windows, you either have to stick with FAT32 (yuck), or buy a copy of MacDrive (better)
|
|
|
|
|
4473
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Wrong numbers
|
on: October 20, 2004, 08:23:54 PM
|
|
That's why Caller ID is the bestest invention of the century - if I don't recognize the number, I don't answer it.
|
|
|
|
|
4474
|
Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Hrm
|
on: October 20, 2004, 05:39:02 PM
|
I thought dune 2 came out after Warcraft....
I remeber playing it after, lol.... Nope - Dune 2 was released in 92, Warcraft was released in 94.
|
|
|
|
|
4477
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Thinking of buying an Apple computer
|
on: October 20, 2004, 01:36:25 PM
|
Personally, I don't think it is. There's nothing wrong with OS X, but it's certainly not the computing nirvana that the Macolytes claim. It does some things better than Windows, and it does some things worse than Windows. Some people will point to the lack of viruses and spyware, but honestly they're not a problem on my Windows machines either. And if there ever is a serious OS X virus, it's going to tear through Mac systems like tissue paper because no one is protected. That's unlikely. By default, every Mac system is protected because it has inherently more security, due to the very tight Unix permissions model. Most Windows users run in the equivalent of Root mode, which is not an active option in Mac OS X. There is no way a virus on your Mac could actually damage the Mac OS without you giving it explicit permission to do so, and even then the damage it could do would be very limited. And that's precisely the attitude I'm talking about. So you're saying there are no holes anywhere that can be exploited? The dozen or so security updates I've installed this year seem to say otherwise. Not running as root doesn't guarantee anything. Yes, it's *more* secure, but it's not foolproof. Pride goeth before the fall, and all that.
|
|
|
|
|
4480
|
Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Thinking of buying an Apple computer
|
on: October 20, 2004, 01:06:56 AM
|
I had the same urges last year, and I ended up getting an iBook... which I think was a wise decision. It was a relatively small cash outlay compared to the rest of the Apple line ($1099), it gave me a good feel for the OS X environment, and the cost was easily recoupable... Mac laptops tend to hold their value much better than the desktop models. While there was still some warranty left on it, I sold it for $850 on ePay, and put it towards the price of a new Powerbook. Another reason I'd recommend the iBook - Apple *today* refreshed their iBook line, and the 12" iBook is now only $999 with a 1.2Ghz processor, 256MB and built-in wireless support. A great bargain anyway you slice it, and if you decide it's not for you, you're not out $2000 or more, or stuck with a 50lbs boat anchor (the eMac) I've been exposed to vague statements like, "Macs rock," "OS X is light years ahead of anything else," "Once you go Mac you'll never go back". Is that crap true? Personally, I don't think it is. There's nothing wrong with OS X, but it's certainly not the computing nirvana that the Macolytes claim. It does some things better than Windows, and it does some things worse than Windows. Some people will point to the lack of viruses and spyware, but honestly they're not a problem on my Windows machines either. And if there ever is a serious OS X virus, it's going to tear through Mac systems like tissue paper because no one is protected. I use my Mac for video production mostly. Which it does very well, at a relatively low cost. But I don't ever see it replacing my Windows PC as my primary computer.
|
|
|
|
|