http://gamingtrend.com
December 22, 2014, 07:14:22 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 247
8361  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Return to the original Everquest - 3 Years Later (56K Warning) on: June 15, 2008, 12:32:28 AM
I'm now back on Venekor evil side for any of you that play the pvp side.
8362  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: [Dead Rising] Capcom has crappy QA on: June 14, 2008, 08:22:08 AM
One thing to understand about this game is that it's meant to be played through multiple times from the beginning.
8363  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Saints Row 2 starting a war with GTA 4? on: June 13, 2008, 10:17:20 AM

Quote from: CeeKay on June 13, 2008, 12:31:26 AM

I'd better be able to recreate my overweigh, underwear clad green afro'd avatar in this one.   Afte that commercial I'm definitely in.  360 version of course.

I look forward to teaming up and pimp slapping ho's with your green fro slywink

I think the commercial is awesome and just displays what GTA could have been if they hadn't missed the mark and squandered away their own ideas.
8364  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC Patch notes 12th of june on: June 12, 2008, 12:01:09 PM
First time I've seen assassins in patch notes, too bad it's not something I thought was a problem.  Hopefully if they ever fix stats working my ~300 dex will mean something. (of course by then other people's strength will be working so I'll be dead quicker slywink )
8365  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Goal Line Blitz on: June 12, 2008, 04:03:19 AM
Sometimes stickign with friends can be rough slywink

Two of my players got offers to start for a pro league team that just won their league. Had to say no.  ninja
8366  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: DEMO IS UP: Battlfield: Bad Company Friday Night on: June 12, 2008, 12:52:56 AM

Quote from: Mikagami on June 11, 2008, 07:37:41 PM

Quote from: ATB on June 11, 2008, 02:05:16 AM

Tonight was fun. Some great last stands. Some great assaults.

Some great crayzay candians: Mikagami thinking that his points from the demo transfer over to real game was the highlight of the night though smile.

Maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaybe they will.
The website seems to be tracking my demo stats just fine.



there is a reason there is a section called 'demo stats' and a whole bunch of sections labeled 'full game stats' slywink 

silly american hats slywink
8367  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: [Impressions] Grid on: June 11, 2008, 05:05:35 PM
got it free due to some trade ins yesterday.  Taking some getting used to with the wheel.  Might have to leave a few assists on for now which I'm not used to.

Overall very fun, love the helm cam.  Wish everyone had to use it all the time slywink
8368  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june (updated with mount info+stealth patch notes) on: June 11, 2008, 12:45:57 AM

Quote from: godhugh on June 10, 2008, 11:38:05 PM

Quote from: Arkon on June 10, 2008, 10:34:20 PM

This is why being a casula gamer in an MMO is great.  I have yet to really see any of the issues people are whining and bitching about.  I don't do PvP which also eliminates alot of the complaints.  I have a low end system, and have yet to experience more than 3 or 4 total crashes, for the most part the game is rock solid. Performance wise I had many more issues with the launches of EQ2, WoW, and Vanguard.

Agreed. I don't know if I'm necessarily a casual player (I have one char, a 42 barb, after 1 1/2 weeks) and while I've seen a few bugs and had some crashes (only in Old Tarantia though) I've probably had more fun with this game then any other MMO, with the exception of City of Heroes. I'm not focused on PvP right now so that probably helps, as well.

I think a large amount of my complaints are pvp related as well.  For a game that touted how revolutionary their pvp combat would be they didn't really put much thought into the pvp aspect.  I could probably ignore the bugs and shortcomings in pve better because when a mob beats you down in pve it doesn't talk shit slywink
8369  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june (updated with mount info+stealth patch notes) on: June 10, 2008, 10:19:41 PM

Quote from: Crux on June 10, 2008, 10:05:54 PM

Playing it. Loving it. Can't be bothered reading all the bitching about it smile

or logging into GLB slywink

I cancelled today.  too many bugs, game crashes on me every time I zone with the latest patch when it was fine before.  My class is ineffective against any non-cloth wearer that isn't more than 6 levels lower.  ( got frustrated and jumped a 40 barbarian with my 58 assassin and he got away pfft!)

I see great potential, and I did have fun for the first 40 levels or so, but the sheer quantity of problems finally bogged me down.  With another year the game could be pretty stellar as long as they add a harsher pvp death penalty
8370  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june (updated with mount info+stealth patch notes) on: June 10, 2008, 05:28:05 PM
This is the third patch in a row that broke some important things while fixing others and changing still others without documenting them.

If I start my game I get two errors in the log that I have an invalid patcher key and one other error, and the memory leak is much much worse.  I'm still not convinced they test these patches before rolling them out or that they are testing them on systems running the same revisions as the live servers.  Take a gander through the tech support thread after this last patch and you'll see that it's not like a 'bad' patch on other mmorpg where most of the people complaining share a common vid card or cpu config that slipped through testing.  These are problems that slipped through and are affecting vast numbers of configurations.  It seems like they test it on one internal setup and then decide it's good to go if it loads ok.  That buff bug last patch was an example of something that could NOT have slipped by testing unless there was no testing to speak of.

For me it's not just the horrible communication, but it's also the way they are portraying themselves as inept programmers and tester who probably should not be working on a major release.  I couldn't do a better job (before someone tells me to slywink ) but the difference is that I realize this and am not working on a major release because of it.

Watching the game evolve from beta to now it's really just two steps forward and three back for me.

The game has great promise, great ideas, worst execution I've ever seen.  Thankfully I missed the AO launch.
8371  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june (updated with mount info) on: June 09, 2008, 04:21:52 PM

Quote from: skystride on June 09, 2008, 04:02:34 PM

I'd like to see them balance the elite dungeons a bit.  It seems to me that the content is always too hard or too easy with very little in between the extremes.  For example the tombs in FoD, the advice I've heard is wait until you are level 60 when all the mobs in there are green/grey.  Are we meant to raid these dungeons because it just seems impossible with an even con group?

Even solo, there is some really strange scaling going on.  Mobs 4 level higher than me are trivial but as soon as they are 5 levels higher they become impossible.  Similarly mobs 4 levels lower can't hit me at all.  They need to gradually scale difficulty instead of setting these apparently hardcoded limits.

this echoes some of my complaints as well.  Things go from too easy to impossible pretty quickly especially in a group.  If I try to hit something +5 I do 5-10 damage per hit, if I hit something my level it's 150 per hit, something -5 it's 500+ per hit.  That's a bit crazy and reminds me of DAOC before they fixed the purple issue.

I still see no reason at all to ever go into an epic dungeon. frown  They are too difficult (or too easy and just take too long) to be worth the time for the reward.  fighting the grey elites can take an eternity but the whole time they can't even outdamage my regen and I'm wearing cloth.
8372  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 09, 2008, 02:35:13 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on June 09, 2008, 02:18:38 PM

Quote from: Harkonis on June 09, 2008, 02:11:13 PM

The mortar attack is mostly for clearing buildings/trees along with concentrations of enemies.  It's pretty useful overall imo.

I guess I'll give it more time.  I thought I had a perfect opportunity with it when an enemy squad was clumped together for a defuse attempt, but it didn't seem to penetrate the ceiling and I didn't get a kill.

I'll play around with it some more tonight.  I think most of my time is going to be split between demo and support, with a little recon tossed in for fun.

Nothing penetrates ceilings, they did that on purpose.  What the mortar will do is take all the walls down allowing you to kill them with your gun.  You can also use it on the few crates that are in the open for decent damage.  It works from the side if you have already removed walls and place it off center.  It's basically the same as the big arty except for damage capacity and aiming.  The big arty can't shoot through ceilings either.
8373  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june (updated with mount info) on: June 09, 2008, 02:20:14 PM
To bo honest I've always felt like I do decent damage when a target isn't running from me.  My only problems are that a barbarian, ranger and guardian can do more in a single shot/combo than I can with my most powerful ability combined with the inability to catch anyone who turns and runs.  Right now the only people that don't turn and run are barbarians, rangers and guardians, go figure slywink
8374  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 09, 2008, 02:11:13 PM
The mortar attack is mostly for clearing buildings/trees along with concentrations of enemies.  It's pretty useful overall imo.

My god the 'other' heli is just wicked.  I just played a round and went 26-0 in that beast.  With the other chopper, I can fly it more stable but can't kill without a gunner.  This one was just sick. 
8375  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june on: June 09, 2008, 01:36:32 PM
Not only did they not buff or fix any of the broken assassin stuff, but they now made it so you can evade an attack from behind which means we no longer get to backstab with impunity on a stationary target slywink
8376  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update 9th of june on: June 09, 2008, 01:24:29 PM

Quote from: Thry on June 09, 2008, 11:51:45 AM

The ironic thing is Demo's own Necro's 1 on 1 and they got buffed first.

Overreach still needs to be nerfed hard.

Hopefully Necro's are included in Thursday's...

+1 to everything Thry said.  I got smacked for a ton by overreach. 

Thry can probably guess what my biggest complaint about the patch is though slywink

.
.
.
Not a single damn mention of the assassin frown
8377  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 09, 2008, 12:33:11 PM
I love the way the US heli handles, but man those rockets suck.  I can do ok damage and distraction without a gunner but once I get a gunner we can turn the tide of the whole battle.  I just had a round with 24 minutes of flight time and we marched all the way to the final 2 crates before I lost a chopper.  was such a rush.
8378  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 09, 2008, 11:20:40 AM
I've seen good results with one 4 man squad coordinating on a team of 'tards slywink

You can make a good push with 2 in the chopper and 2 on ground

On defense you can kick ass with 2 covering one crate and 2 either on the other crate or sweeping towards the enemy spawn.

Eventually the people who don't work well as a team will no longer be playing and the whole dynamic of the game will change.
8379  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Recharging health - Yay or Nay? on: June 09, 2008, 11:18:42 AM
I'm not opposed to having a 'non-realistic' way of healing, but I'd prefer it not be auto-regenning or pre-placed medkits throughout a level.

I like how it in Battlefield: Bad Company where the assault class can have an auto-injector that heals a bit and the support class can heal others by providing medkits.  It's incentive to work as a team and in that aspect the healing works.  Solo games I wish were just designed so that you didn't get hurt as often.  It's always a turn off for me playing a game where I can get shot by 100's of bullets and shrug it off whether by ducking behind a wall for 30 seconds or picking up the magical med pack across the hall.
8380  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC Character Art, etc on: June 09, 2008, 11:15:34 AM

Quote from: CeeKay on June 09, 2008, 07:23:34 AM

Quote from: Blackjack on June 09, 2008, 04:55:02 AM

And I forgot I read this in previews, but now I know at 40, is when the "full combat" system comes into place with the Q and E key, lower attacks. Surely my fingers will get even more confused now.  icon_razz

oh yeah.. I've spent the last few levels staring quizzically at the screen anytime one of those came up for a combo.  what's even worse is I had been using the 2,3,4 keys for the attacks, and now it's all being thrown off by being forced to use 1,2,3.

oh, and I have to say the Mammoth is really, freaking... S.......


L..........


O.....................................................................................




W.

I use ~1234 for the five attacks.  since I was used to using 123 for the middle and didn't want to relearn it.  You can reprogram yours to however you want it on the key bindings menu.
8381  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC - Wanderers Updates (DERKETO Server) on: June 09, 2008, 01:12:42 AM

Quote from: jersoc on June 08, 2008, 06:06:39 PM

I think a lot of those skills are broken personally. I swear mana attractor or whatever is not working. It seems like renew mana has some crazy low formula as well. The only thing that appears to work is casting concentration and you don't need to put anymore than 100 into that. Of course I could be wrong because I have no idea HOW the are suppose to work, just what they are suppose to DO. and it appears they don't do anything.

Most of the skills work, they just have crap descriptions.

Run Speed is very useful even at 1% per 100 points imo.  Hang out with people who have it maxed and you'll notice a difference.

Recovery, fast recovery, bandaging, mana attracter and regen mana are all skills that only affect your regen rate while resting.  If you take all the points out of them and rest then put the points into them and rest you'll see the difference immediately.
8382  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 08, 2008, 06:14:50 AM

Quote from: Eduardo X on June 08, 2008, 05:39:51 AM

I skipped CoD4 after the beta due to the lack of a cover system. I am not opposed to trying it again, but that really turned me off.

COD4 was very fast paced and fast paced games don't really have a need for cover systems.  What a cover system does is slow down the pace and turn the game into more of a stop, think and shoot.  COD4 was so fast that there was no time for more cover than you could already get by crouching and moving slowly.

BF:BC is also fast paced AND has destructable terrain.  In both of these games there's not much a cover system would even add other than more buttons to manage.

R6 had a good cover system and it works well, but R6 is also a slower paced game with an emphasis on taking your time and getting into position without exposing yourself.  In Cod4 you should be sprinting if you are ever out in the open and behind something otherwise.  You can take cover without a cover system slywink
8383  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 08, 2008, 06:11:51 AM

Quote from: ATB on June 07, 2008, 11:01:31 PM

I think I finally got the controls for the helicopter down.  Couldn't hit anything with the rockets though...got maybe 3 kills.  Was able to succesfully bail out and get right on the crate though.

My most recent match was a 455 pt slaughter with me scoring 21pts per minute.  Went 28/16.

Have I mentioned I love this game ?   crybaby

the rockets are a bitch.  Basically when I fly the chopper with the rockets my gunner gets 15-20 kills and I just fly.  When I fly the chopper with the minigum I get 15-20 kills and my gunner gets about 5. slywink 

With a good gunner (Jarrod is A #1 when it comes to this btw) I have been able to completely clean house and we've gone from the first base (as attackers) to the end with the heli accounting for about 50% of crate destruction and 100% of mayhem slywink
8384  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 07, 2008, 09:04:04 PM

Quote from: Eduardo X on June 07, 2008, 08:55:18 PM

I hate to keep saying it, but the lack of a cover mechanism in FPS games makes games without them obsolete.

I disagree strongly.  COD4 obsolete?  Not sure how you can say that after playing it.  A well done cover system can add greatly to a game, but a poorly done one can kill a game.  I'd rather have a game without on than a game with a poorly implemented one anyday and I don't think we've hit the point yet where a cover system is a done deal.

What good would a cover system do in BF:BC anyway?  You take cover behind something and it'd be gone in about .5 seconds.
8385  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Steaks on: June 07, 2008, 05:47:59 AM
yet another frightening instance of me agreeing with ATB.  I used to always get medium well and now flipped to the medium rare
8386  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 07, 2008, 05:37:39 AM

Quote from: ATB on June 07, 2008, 03:13:29 AM

PS. This is my GOTY already. Just based on the demo. Yes. It's that good.

What would be nice though is if we could fill a room with squads. Appears you can only invite people for a squad of 4.  Any others either go into a different squad or get zorked over the other team.

PS. GOTY!

My biggest problem with the game right now is that it seems like it will be impossible to coordinate more than 4 people in a game.  If we could figure out a way to get 2 squads in games together on the same team we could just use a vent server for communications.
8387  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 06, 2008, 11:00:55 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on June 06, 2008, 01:53:45 PM

Quote from: Harkonis on May 30, 2008, 03:49:07 PM

I also have a complaint about the sniper rifles.  The default sniper rifle doesn't quite kill in one shot unless you head shot.  This would be fine if it didn't take 2-3 full seconds to chamber a second round.  Then I spent an unlock token on the higher damage sniper rifle.  While it did in fact do more damage, it still takes 2 shots and it loads even slower.  Not a whole lot of point to that upgrade imo.  I should have gone the other route and grabbed the faster shooting silenced one.

Was it the M95 you unlocked and didn't like?

Yes, not enough of an upgrade to warrant an unlock token imo.
8388  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 05, 2008, 09:40:15 PM
Game played great with the limited access preorders

Now that there is no limit on how many people can play I think EA's servers are fubar.  Same thing that happened with Burnout Paradise on release of both the demo and full game.  Hopefully they don't repeat and make us wait a week or two for stable gaming.
8389  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 04, 2008, 01:55:54 PM
At least this time you have to land the heli to repair it slywink

Had a 23 kill 14 minute streak in the heli with Jarrod last night, was very fun.  If the other team hasn't figured out how easy it is to shoot me down, it's a bit of a slaughter.

Now I just wish I could reset my unlocks since I screwed them up.  I have to wait until the release to use the guns I wanted.
8390  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 03, 2008, 05:43:44 PM
Though I understand how you would want the ease of throwing grenades like in COD4, I would like to see you try to throw a grenade without putting your gun away in real life slywink

That 'uber' weapon you refer to is the laser designator.  It's the unlock for the recon class (sniper).  You paint a vehicle or turret target for a few seconds and it calls in the airstrike and then you guide the missile into the target.  If you think it's uber I suggest you try it out, it's far from it.  Very hard to aim and very very limited blast radius so you have to aim well.  In beta it was extremely good, now it's just good.

Usually the first thing I do as far as unlocks go is to unlock the anti-vehicle option for each class.  (assault doesn't have one, but they start with the grenade launcher which is ok at it.)

8391  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Boobraham Lincoln (NSFW for church employees) on: June 03, 2008, 12:06:49 PM
If more than one thread can have ATB in it, more than one thread can have NSFW pictures in it.  I think that's a law somewhere. slywink
8392  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 02, 2008, 11:36:01 PM

Quote from: RuperT on June 02, 2008, 11:11:31 PM

I'm definitely a BF-series fanboy, although this was the first BF I'd played on a console.  The beta was a lot of fun; I played enough to get all the unlocks, mostly enjoying Oasis.
I did have some complaints, and I really hope they've been addressed since the beta.
#1: Gaydar!  OK, UAV's (which show the position of enemy soldiers, typically for a brief period) have been in these kind of games for a while now, and I understand the basic purpose of shortening the 'search' part of 'search-and-destroy', but this implementation is just too damn much.  Basically, a member of the opposing team 'looks' at you by placing the crosshair on you, and the game automatically 'spots' you (not a keypress like the PC BFs, but it had some flakiness in that it wouldn't consistently trigger).  Once spotted, your position is known to the entire enemy team.  Pretty standard, right?  Wait, not only does the enemy see you on their map or mini-map, IT PUTS A FRIGGING DOT ON YOUR LOCATION ON THE MAIN VIEWSCREEN.  Well, OK, some people don't understand maps, I get that.  Wait, IT ALSO UPDATES THIS INFORMATION IN REAL-TIME.  Well, maybe that helps people who nee- FOR LIKE 8 TO 10 FREAKING SECONDS!  Combine this mechanism with destructible walls, and I spent a lot of time madly running away from combat while an enemy Bradley destroyed every wall between me and him, then turning around and heading back when I thought my 'signature' had worn off.  Now, in my day, we used to call this kind of thing a 'wall hack', and it was generally reviled.  Now it's cool?  No.  It's still not cool.  Actually, there's too much of this onscreen information in general.  It doesn't really help me to see dots for every friendly within 10 miles, indeed it hurts if an enemy gets between us resulting in a slow threat identification.  I don't like that the crates have a 'shoot here' triangle for enemy boats or tanks to sit back and shell.  Will there be a hardcore mode without this egregious level of hand-holding?  Suck it up, noobs, read a friggin' objective description now and then why don't ya?
#2: Squad/team management.  I understand that in this context, the developers are smart to limit team-changing, but I've been on both sides of some severely unbalanced matches and there was nothing much to do about it except leave.  Is there some kind of autobalance now?  I seem to recall that it wouldn't even consistently add new players to the shorthanded team.  The squad system had the same problem of manageability.  I never figured out how to start a new squad or join a different squad (e.g. your only other squadmate just wants to practice his 'nap-in-the-earth' helo flying).  Am I hearing there is some kind of party system that will let me squad with Friends?  Anything new on that front?

These were the big ones.  I also wasn't crazy about some of the class decisions they made, but this is de rigeur with non-homogenous shooters.  For example, usually there's not much reason to be anything other than sniper.  Support is mostly useless, IMO.  The Anti-Tank weapon is really not much use against tanks, even square in the rear.  Of course, there may be other environments in the full game where these other classes come into their own.

What's the final disposition of the unlocks?  Initially, the 'buy-only' unlocks at the top were to be sold on Marketplace, or included in the Gold Edition.  I thought I'd heard that EA had decided to include these with the regular product, as the 'pay for advantage' aspect raised something of a stink.  Like Hark said, the 'non-buy' unlocks are mostly minor differences.  I think the main advantage to them is not having to rely on the weapons a particular army offers you for your bread-and-butter class; ie you can always use your unlock and get intimate with it.

Finally, I'll probably get the damn thing anyway.  I didn't really get into COD4 MP, but I look forward to fragging with some of you FPSers.  Look for MooseFoe (also for GTAIV now).

PS: Hi.




The 'gaydar' as you call it is no different than the system in BF2 where you could mark your target and it would show up on everyone's radar/hud.  The only small difference is that instead of pulling up a menu and selecting what the target is, it automatically calls out what it is.  You ONLY show up on radar if someone has spotted you and kept you in the center of their vision for more than about 1.5-2 seconds.  It's really not that hard to avoid if that's your game plan.  I like the dots because not only does it make it much easier to shoot the noobs, but when you get good at not being a dot, peopel assume you aren't there and it's much easier to kick their ass unseen slywink

If the crates weren't marked as such, the 50% of players that actually do try to attack or defend objectives wouldn't. slywink  Most but not all crates are in positions that boats, tanks and helis can't take them out easily anyway.  There's usually one every couple waypoints that is accessible to tanks.  If you let a tank kill the crate you deserve it anyway since it takes about a dozen rounds and no tank should live that long.

Regarding the auto-balance, it seems like it was in the beta, but not the demo.  Hopefully with full servers it won't be an issue but I agree that this could be a problem if they don't bring it back.
8393  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 02, 2008, 11:31:10 PM

Quote from: wonderpug on June 02, 2008, 10:46:39 PM

Quote from: Harkonis on May 30, 2008, 07:24:24 PM

I went gold so I don't have to wait until level 25 to get the 5 extra weapons.  I'm silly like that apparently.

There are 5 weapons you can unlock prior to the games release btw.  If you're planning on playing it's worth looking into it at the game's official site.  One is for preordering, one for signing up for the newsletter, one for ranking to max in the demo, don't recall where the other two are.

I need a weapon unlocking 101 rundown.  Do I have this right?

Five, and only five, weapons you can unlock prior to release?
Only one of which is from preordering?  (which one?)
Every other weapon unlocked through the game proper, but the aforementioned five you won't get until you hit the level cap?

http://badcompany.ea.com/page/dynpid/8616/

there's the info on how to get each of the five weapons. 

One is for pre-ordering and you get the code when you pre-order.
One is for signing up for their newsletter and you get the code when you do.
One is for hitting max rank in the demo and you get the code when you do.
One is for hitting 'veteran' status in the full retail game.
One is for checking your stats on their stats page after release.

The stats are like the PC version of BF2 btw, it's pretty similar to what H3 did.

8394  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 02, 2008, 08:51:02 PM

Quote from: Teggy on June 02, 2008, 08:16:42 PM

So how do you get the demo when you pre-order?  They are supposed to email me something? Is there some secret link on Live?

Yes there is, instructions will be in the email.  It's the same method that you will get any beta or early demo as well. Super Sekret way to get stuph on xbl slywink
8395  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update notes 2nd of june + extra (Updated with unoffical notes) on: June 02, 2008, 08:50:11 PM

Quote from: coopasonic on June 02, 2008, 06:51:25 PM

Quote from: Harkonis on June 02, 2008, 05:40:09 PM

Assassins and HoX are completely broken and not functioning well enough to play the game.

hark is going to hate me for this, but as I was reading this thread, I was thinking, "What's he talking about my assassin rocks!"

Then I remembered I was playing a ranger. *hides*
lmao.  That's just EVIL!

BTW, for ther record I was just starting to have enough survivability that I was having fun with PvE when I discovered the polearm technique that rendered my assassin useless in pvp.  Quite frustrating. 

If you stop by the assassin forums you can see all the posts of people who are level 80 and have put their assassins away.  There's also the rather amusing part that people are switching from the assassin to other classes and then going 'omg, this is so easy!' and levelling up to 40-50 in 2 days instead of 2 weeks.  It was quite a shock to myself, I know that.
8396  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 02, 2008, 05:53:27 PM

Quote from: Teggy on June 02, 2008, 05:49:27 PM

Quote from: ATB on June 02, 2008, 05:37:43 PM

Quote from: Teggy on June 02, 2008, 05:36:16 PM

Quote from: Bullwinkle on June 02, 2008, 05:22:21 PM

I did not know.

You deserve a Webby for that performance.

Brava!  Author!

He's lucky he was acting, because I pre-ordered during lunch, and I could not be held responsible for what would have happened.

Lolz. Can't wait to play with you.  What's neat is that my ineptness at this game gives me some small sense of the crushing lack of skills you have in COD4 and makes me realize what strong character you're building every time you turn on your 360.

 icon_biggrin

Spoiler for Hiden:
Totally kidding. slywink



icon_lol Sadly, there is some truth in there.  I'm realizing the simple mathematical difficulty in digging out of the .75 k/d hole I've gotten myself into. Maybe now with my newly learned shooter skillz (COD4 is the first online shooter I've played) I can start off on a better foot with BF.  Although more likely I will be getting gunned down by helicopter fire, stepping on mines and getting rolled over by tanks in no time.

Even if you're not much of a shot, there are plenty of ways to be helpful to the team in BF.  If nothing else pick support and follow me dropping medkits slywink  Just stay down so they don't shoot me trying to get ya.
8397  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 02, 2008, 05:44:48 PM

Quote from: ATB on June 02, 2008, 12:10:26 PM

So I got in about 2 hrs last night and while there are several things that require adjustment, this game is quite awesome. Most of my complaints are of a n00bian slant and I'm sure all of them will be cleared up when I get a manual (hopefully)...

Pros:

-Map Size/Environments
-Weapon/Vehicle variety
-Sound (omg the sound!)
-Size of Skirmishes (8 on Cool
-Vehicles  They're just neat

Cons:
-Complex. I can't tell what the heck is going on a lot of the time.  For example, I unlocked meds for MP, but they only show up in one kit. Huh?
-Unlock Screen- It shows a picture of the weapon, but doesn't really tell you what it does. For example, there was this round thing with a number designation. I eventually realized it was an Anti-Tank mine.  A bit better explanation on the unlocks would be nice...oh and to what kits they go to
-Squad communication- For whatever reason you can only communicate with guys on your squad...and in many cases, though it seems like we have 8 people on a team, I am only in a squad with 1 other guy.  I don't know if that's cause of when we joined or what...
-Aiming- It seems more genuine, but COD4's aiming system is SO tight, that anything seems to pail.  On the flipside, it's more realistic IMO as you don't actually zoom in like you do on COD4 aiming
-Hit indicator- I can't usually tell that I'm hitting someone.  Also, it really does take a lot of rounds (shaddup Hark!) to take someone down.

I  was also underwhelmed by the SP demo.  The MP, however, has been really really neat. I look forward to many GT nights of taking on the world.

You are right in that most of your complaints are noobish slywink  I'll go easy on ya though.

There is a hit indicator, it's a red semi-circle that pops up.  If you look for it, it's hard to miss so I'm not sure what your complaint  there is.  On the unlock screen the unlocks are in columns and each column is a kit. slywink  Not too hard to figure that out imo.

Squad communications is a key point and you are correct.  I think they do this so you can coordinate with squad mates without having to 'talk over' the rest of your team.  Considering all the squad level bonuses you get combined with the spawn on squad option I think it'll work out pretty well in the long run.

If you unlocked the med kit, then it was in the first column which is assault.

The demo does need a manual, but you can actually find all about the game including how to play at the official website.  Most of your questions would be answered there.  I still stand by my statement that it really doesn't take much to kill someone, if you find it does then you are probably shooting from beyond your weapons effective range.
8398  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update notes 2nd of june + extra (Updated with unoffical notes) on: June 02, 2008, 05:40:09 PM

Quote from: Blackjack on June 02, 2008, 05:26:17 PM

Conquerors suck! If they don't make me awesome, I quit!  smoke

Anyone who thinks they can have this many classes and please everyone all of the time is smoking something funny and not sharing with the rest of us.  stirthepot icon_lol My Conqueror drops like a load of bricks and I'm just not yet at the point of knowing whether the AT type is borked, my points are all poorly distributed, I just suck, or some combination thereof.  icon_razz

I don't begrudge people on the official forums screaming bloody murder about their respective ATs, but when has any mmorpg launch not brought about the same complaints? For that matter, MMOs that have been out 5 years still have people complaining about class-balancing. If they had Diablo's original 3 classes (a melee character, a bow character and a mage), then balancing would be easy. I'm just convinced the price devs and players play for flexibility and a wide range of types is a balancing situation that's pretty much impossible to ever resolve to everyone's satisfaction, esp. trying to accommodate PvE and PvP styles at the same time.

Anyway. Conquerors suck! I quit!  icon_lol

BJ, there is a huge difference between wanting to be better, and wanting to be viable in the slightest.  Demos, Necros, Conqs and Bear Shaman are all classes that are a bit lacking and probably need more balance.  This is to be expected.

Assassins and HoX are completely broken and not functioning well enough to play the game.  I could go through the huge list of problems, but you obviously don't give a shit and just think people whine because they aren't overpowered.  The quick list is that the manual says Assassins do the most damage, yet a ranger of the same level shooting the same mob does 2x my sneak attack from 20m away while not stealthed.  That's broken.  I'm wearing cloth and have massive amounts of dex, yet a guardian in full plate has 3x the evade chance that I do.  That ain't right.

The final step was when a guardian 4 levels lower than me beat me in pvp by not using ANY combos or abilities after I got the jump on her.  I did a sneak attack, opened up with my biggest combo and got her to 50%.  From there she backed up, pulled out a polearm and ran circles around me swinging normal swings and as a dagger user with no snares, knockdowns, stuns, charges, lunges, etc, I never even hit her again.   If I get a sneak attack off on a mage class and catch them completely unaware, I MIGHT win.  If any class tries to go toe to toe and just stands there, I MIGHT win.  But the sad truth is that the way combat is set up right now, if you either just run away or run in circles, you will beat any assassin that doesn't kill you in one shot.

I've been on the 'gimp' side of classes before and sometimes for many years.  I played a hunter in DAOC and except for the first 2 weeks they were pretty useless in both PvE and PvP until the revamp 2 years later but I stuck with it.  They were not however completely 100% incapable of winning any fight vs someone who knows how to move.

I tend to gravitate towards classes people think are bad just to prove them wrong.  I do the same with builds. There just isnt' anything to work with here.  Squishy armor + no range + no CC = pointless class.  Sadly they will probably 'fix' it by just making the sneak attack do more and then we'll truly be one shot wonders. frown 
8399  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC update notes 2nd of june + extra on: June 02, 2008, 11:02:18 AM
I'm a bit baffled.  Two increses to abilities on two of the most overpowered classes and still nothing for the weakest.  I'm glad I shelved my character. frown
8400  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: Anyone else playing the BF:BC Demo? on: June 01, 2008, 03:33:15 PM

Quote from: ATB on June 01, 2008, 01:49:44 PM

I played last night and there definitely is a learning curve.

I didn't get much time in cause I tuned in to the MMA primtime special. 

It was hard to get my bearings and I didn't like that it takes a ton of rounds to kill a guy.  However, I loved the scale of the maps and the vehicles- though it is a sea change from the smaller more intimate maps of COD4.

Hopefully I'll get to play some more tonight.

I've preordered the gold edition and from what I see so far, Ii has the potential to be a time sink on the scale of COD 4.  I'm definitely in.

So far I haven't had any problems with lethality, seems to take just a couple more than COD4 for me.  You may be missing slywink
Pages: 1 ... 208 209 [210] 211 212 ... 247
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.309 seconds with 21 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.091s, 1q)