http://gamingtrend.com
August 02, 2014, 04:39:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17
561  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: What's Behind (and Ahead for) the Plunging Price of Oil on: October 25, 2008, 03:32:53 PM

Quote from: pr0ner on October 25, 2008, 03:05:28 PM

Quote from: SensuousLettuce on October 25, 2008, 01:23:53 PM

Notice gas prices aren't dropping as quickly as they go up.  And no one elected office is doing anything about it...

Maybe because a gas station owner wants/needs to sell his older gas he bought at a higher price somewhere near that price so he doesn't take a total bath on it?  So he, you know, can attempt to make a profit and keep his station open?

And your defense for why he raised the price so eagerly on gas he'd already bought for less?

Ale
562  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin as President on: October 24, 2008, 06:16:51 PM

Quote from: Brendan on October 24, 2008, 04:20:53 PM

Any word on the cost of haircuts?

edit:

She did an interview with People magazine that's out on newstands today that reveals the next baby name she'd use:

Quote
Palin said if she and husband Todd had had a sixth child, they had already picked a name for a boy joining siblings Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper and Trig.

"I always wanted a son named Zamboni," she said.

I have to admire her creativity.

Seeing as that's the machine that grooms hockey rinks, I'm hoping that's humor, not creativity.

Ale
563  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: It's a lock. Obama will win 60% to McCain's 40%. on: October 24, 2008, 02:59:13 PM

Quote from: cheeba on October 24, 2008, 02:39:25 PM

Unfair poll. We all know the liberal elite sip a ton of over-priced coffee while reading their Nietzsche!

Apparently so does Joe the Plumber, considering the poll involves 7-11 coffee.

Ale
564  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin as President on: October 23, 2008, 08:39:18 PM

Quote from: msduncan on October 23, 2008, 07:51:02 PM

Quote from: Alefroth on October 21, 2008, 07:10:45 PM

Quote from: msduncan on October 21, 2008, 06:21:23 PM


Same ol' Democrat character assassination on Palin.      I'm not suprised.

Same ol' Duncan hypocrisy.

Ale



Your side paints Palin as either stupid, or insane (relative to her religious beliefs).

My side paints Obama as a socialist.   And he is.    Redistribution of wealth is socalist.    This tax plan of Obama's is redistribution of wealth.   38% of those he would give a tax cut to already get full refunds.

I never have advocated or subscribed to the idea that Obama was anti-American, muslim, or any of the blogger smears.   Liberal bloggers, on the other hand, are just as out of control as some on the right.

You're kidding, wright?

Ale
565  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: John McCain's Hypocrisy on: October 22, 2008, 09:35:53 PM

Quote from: cheeba on October 22, 2008, 08:35:13 PM

Quote from: rickfc on October 22, 2008, 07:36:49 PM

John McCain's spiritual guide.  Scary as fuck...
And Jeremiah Wright isn't scary?

Edit - See, this is why y'all think I'm pro-McCain and/or anti-Obama. The minister linked in the video is scary as hell. But so is Jeremiah Wright. Some of the hypocritical points in that video about McCain are bad. But Obama has changed his views as well, and has been hypocritical as well. For example, first he was against drilling, now he seems to be for it. He promised to take public funding, but realized how dumb that was and went back on it. Politicians are hypocrites by their very nature.

No, the reason we think you're right-wing is because whenever someone posts anything critical of a conservative, you always say, "But the democrats are just as bad". I've never seen you do anything similar when a liberal is criticized. It's ok to have a critical discussion of someone. We don't constantly need to be reminded that someone else is guilty also.

Ale
566  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin as President on: October 21, 2008, 07:10:45 PM

Quote from: msduncan on October 21, 2008, 06:21:23 PM


Same ol' Democrat character assassination on Palin.      I'm not suprised.

Same ol' Duncan hypocrisy.

Ale

567  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: [Presidential Election] Undecided? on: October 16, 2008, 05:01:46 AM
McKinney 93
Nader 85
Obama 68
McCain 48

I guess the most liberal senator evar! is not liberal enough for me.

Ale
568  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Waterboard Obama! on: October 16, 2008, 04:57:11 AM

Quote from: cheeba on October 15, 2008, 09:39:10 PM

Quote from: Jaddison on October 15, 2008, 04:22:17 PM

The hits just keep on coming.  We, as a country, have not progressed as far as we might like to think.
I love quotes like this.

We, as a country, for the first time in our history have a black man running as one of the major candidates for President.
We, as a country, for the first time in our history are very likely to elect that black man into the highest office one can attain in our country.

But you don't hear that much do you? Instead, you hear junk like, "we are not as progressed as we might like to think" because some idiot county chairman is being an idiot.

No doubt there's still a lot of progress to be made, but this should be a time of celebration. Look at the 50 some million or whatever people who are going to vote for the first time for a black candidate, rather than the 1 idiot county chairman who thought he was being clever with stupid slogans.

"We, as a country, have not progressed as far as we might like to think."

How are these two statements different?

Ale
569  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Video on: October 11, 2008, 04:55:28 PM

Quote from: cheeba on October 11, 2008, 01:32:04 PM

Quote from: Jeff Jones on October 11, 2008, 12:22:03 PM

What's next? you're voting for Obama?!  icon_lol
Roll Eyes retard

Actually I am voting for Obama. This would not surprise you if little things like facts mattered in your reasoning.

Little tip for ya: arguing against the far-left insanity often displayed on this forum does not make me far right.

Maybe people wouldn't think you so conservative if you spent any time arguing against the far-right insanity.

Ale
570  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Video on: October 11, 2008, 04:52:27 PM

Quote from: cheeba on October 11, 2008, 04:16:19 AM

Quote from: Jeff Jones on October 11, 2008, 02:41:25 AM

Holy christ. These people make Cheeba seem like a flaming liberal in comparison.
You talk as if I'm ultra-conservative, when I'm closer to the middle than you are Tongue.

How do you know that? Do you know where he stands on nearly every issue?

Ale
571  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: After failing to block potentially damaging report, Palin releases own repor on: October 11, 2008, 01:40:59 AM
I'm so shocked the Alaska legislature came to a different conclusion than the McCain campaign.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7662820.stm

4 more years, baby!

Ale
572  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: McCain Campaign Official: Obama to Give Tax Breaks to NAMBLA Members on: October 08, 2008, 02:54:15 AM

Quote from: cheeba on October 08, 2008, 12:47:47 AM

Quote from: Autistic Angel on October 08, 2008, 12:30:30 AM

Yes.  In that thread, an outspoken Republican started a thread because he took personal umbrage at the suggestion that any other Republican, anywhere, would ever mount a race-based attack.  You didn't have a problem with that.

In this thread, an outspoken Democrat has started a thread about a particularly explicit race-based attack made by a Republican working on McCain's campaign and, after dismissing it as a "joke" by a "county scrub," you've started objecting to the very existence of the topic.
Context matters. It matters who says what. Everyone cares what Barack Obama says. No one cares what some idiot county chairman says.
Quote
what *exactly* was your point?  Does overt, vitriolic racism not count so long as the campaign official spewing it eventually remembers to say, "Kidding!"


You don't get to make that call, and, you've been proven wrong.

Ale
573  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin opens mouth, useless comes out. on: October 06, 2008, 04:09:16 AM

Quote from: cheeba on October 06, 2008, 03:17:13 AM

Quote from: Lee on October 06, 2008, 02:51:24 AM

So if two people serve on a board, of a charitable group, it means they have some sort of relationship that a voter needs to be concerned about?
Don't forget that Obama went to Ayers' home to kick off his senate run.
Quote
I am certainly not friends with everyone I work closely with on a daily basis.
Have you gone to the home of anyone you worked with who was not your friend?
Quote
Why should it reflect badly on Obama that someone who supports him has a bad history but is now a community leader?
That "bad history" is more like "radical, terrorist history." Personally, I can't blame people for asking the questions about his ties to this guy. Whether or not those questions are satisfactorily answered is up to each person to decide for himself. For me, someone who is very likely to vote for Obama, this doesn't change that. It does add a pause in there, though, and it is worth criticism.

What exactly is the pause? Do you think maybe under Obama's leadership, the Weather Underground will be resurgent? Again, what gives you pause?

Ale
574  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin opens mouth, useless comes out. on: October 05, 2008, 09:51:22 PM

Quote from: cheeba on October 05, 2008, 09:47:36 PM

Quote from: Jeff Jones on October 05, 2008, 08:24:04 PM

most recently by slandering Obama as one who hangs out with terrorists.
You're saying it's untrue he hung around with Ayers? Or that Ayers is not a terrorist?

Ummm.... both. If he's a terrorist, why is he still on the loose? He's got to be easier to find than bin Laden , don't you think?

Ale
575  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: O.J. GUILTY on all counts on: October 05, 2008, 06:30:55 PM

Quote from: Xmann on October 05, 2008, 11:36:34 AM

OJ knew exactly what the hell he was doing, however setup it might seem or been.   he's a lowlife scum who got away with murder and thought he was above the law.  he could have simply went to the proper authorities and went through the proper channels to get his property.   but instead he chose to go along with this plan, which included guns btw.

hell ya he deserves to go down.   karma is a bitch....won't find one drop of sympathy or second guessing with this for me.   i personally don't care how he went down....just that he did.

Except where you second guess the jury that acquitted him.

Ale
576  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin opens mouth, useless comes out. on: October 05, 2008, 06:28:49 PM

Quote from: mikeg on October 05, 2008, 01:27:43 PM

For me personally, I don't give a rat's ass what they think on how old the earth is.  Their opinion on that matter has no affect on me.  What does is their opinion on these terrorist motherfuckers and our economy.  I want every last one of them, and their supporters, dead dead dead.  That and someone in office who doesn't think stealing more of my hard-earned money to make gov't bigger is the answer to America's problems.  Those are the ONLY two things I care about.  On every other subject I will take care of myself.   



So who do you think best addresses your two criteria?

Ale
577  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: O.J. GUILTY on all counts on: October 04, 2008, 07:38:37 PM

Quote from: Jeff Jones on October 04, 2008, 05:41:36 PM

Quote from: metallicorphan on October 04, 2008, 05:26:10 PM



LOL,yeah he's famous isnt he,so i reckon a fine and some community service

Correction. He was famous. He's now infamous. I'm hoping the sentencing judge was really pissed at the outcome of the "trial of the century", and doesn't mind setting things right.

It would be sad if that happened. Judges aren't supposed to have vendettas.

Ale


578  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Budweiser American Ale - Actually good on: October 02, 2008, 10:09:09 PM

Quote from: Lee on October 02, 2008, 10:03:07 PM

Quote from: Alefroth on October 02, 2008, 09:57:38 PM

Another reason rice is popular in American lagers is that it is cheaper than barley malt.

Do all the big guys use it? I always thought it was a Bud thing.

Speaking of AB, how is ShockTop? I have never tried it.

I think some of them do, and some also use corn in the form of starch or syrup (especially malt liquors).

I didn't know Shock Top was AB. That's the orangey wheat or belgian-style one, isn't it? I smelled one someone was drinking out of a bottle and it didn't smell very good.

Ale
579  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Budweiser American Ale - Actually good on: October 02, 2008, 09:57:38 PM

Quote from: mori on October 02, 2008, 09:32:44 PM

Rice adds no flavor to the beer. It is used to lighten the body and dryness to the beer. It gives the so-called "crispness" that Bud has marketed to us for generations.

While technically rice may contribute no flavor of it's own, you can't say brewing with it doesn't influence the flavor of the beer. You could use plain white sugar as an adjunct, and while you wouldn't be able to taste the sugar, the flavor would be noticeably different.

Another reason rice is popular in American lagers is that it is cheaper than barley malt.

Ale
580  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Budweiser American Ale - Actually good on: October 02, 2008, 09:53:06 PM

Quote from: Lee on October 02, 2008, 08:23:39 PM

Quote from: Alefroth on October 02, 2008, 08:13:18 PM

Quote from: Lee on October 01, 2008, 10:31:37 PM

I strongly disagree. While it is drinkable compared to the rest of the stuff they call beer, it is still quite weak flavored and has this Budweiser like after taste that I didn't like it all (maybe from the rice?). It tastes like a water downed amber to me. I would buy it only if my choices were it or Bud. For that price ($7 here) I expect a lot more from a beer.

I'd be surprised if it contained rice or corn. Have you seen an ingredient list?



Ale

No, but Budweiser uses rice in their other beers, why would this be different? It has a similar taste to Bud I think.

Because this is a different kind of beer? The whole point is to mimic a craft brew, isn't it?

I wonder if they are 'aging' it on beechwood, and if that might give it a distinctive Bud taste.

Ale
581  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Budweiser American Ale - Actually good on: October 02, 2008, 08:13:18 PM

Quote from: Lee on October 01, 2008, 10:31:37 PM

I strongly disagree. While it is drinkable compared to the rest of the stuff they call beer, it is still quite weak flavored and has this Budweiser like after taste that I didn't like it all (maybe from the rice?). It tastes like a water downed amber to me. I would buy it only if my choices were it or Bud. For that price ($7 here) I expect a lot more from a beer.

I'd be surprised if it contained rice or corn. Have you seen an ingredient list?

Ale
582  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: My kidney stone is back or something on: October 02, 2008, 07:55:11 PM
Damn. Are you sure it's the stones again? Have you ever had appendicitis?

Ale
583  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC server merge coming on: October 02, 2008, 07:05:58 PM

Quote from: Kevin Grey on October 02, 2008, 06:49:45 PM

Quote from: Alefroth on October 02, 2008, 06:42:56 PM

It's not just that he posted a new thread, it's that he loves to see something fail that he either didn't like, or couldn't play, and doesn't miss a chance to bring it up. He's been doing it for years.

And this is different from the rest of the internet, how? 

What's your point? Do you really think that's all the Internet is?

Ale
584  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: AoC server merge coming on: October 02, 2008, 06:42:56 PM

Quote from: Kevin Grey on October 01, 2008, 01:37:17 PM

The bickering in here is ridiculous and needs to stop.  While we all might prefer tidier threads, GT doesn't have a policy about "Official" threads or anything of the sort so it's generally up to the posters' discretion if they start a new thread or put it in an existing thread.  People who are intent on criticizing the quality of others posts probably wouldn't want that same microscope applied to every one of their own posts. 

FWIW, I agree with morlac and DragonFyre- I would never have looked into AoC impressions thread but I do find news of the server merge interesting in an industry news sense and would not have known about it if it weren't for this thread. 

It's not just that he posted a new thread, it's that he loves to see something fail that he either didn't like, or couldn't play, and doesn't miss a chance to bring it up. He's been doing it for years.

Ale
585  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Palin opens mouth, useless comes out. on: October 01, 2008, 05:02:50 PM

Quote from: cheeba on October 01, 2008, 01:05:03 PM

I find it hilarious that we have probably the biggest financial crisis in our lifetime going on and there's only a tiny little thread with hardly any comments about it, and yet you bring up Palin and people post like it's an Apple vs. PC debate, lol.

Yeah, it's pretty funny that you're not over there fostering discussion. Just can't stay away from this thread, eh?

Ale
586  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: LOTRO - State of the game on: October 01, 2008, 02:26:00 AM

Quote from: The Grue on September 30, 2008, 02:32:31 PM

Quote from: TiLT on September 30, 2008, 01:42:39 PM

I don't really get the bonus xp stunt. If this was WoW, I'd understand, but in LOTRO, the entire point is to enjoy the leveling process, not to zoom past it. It's not like getting to level 50 is a hard task these days anyway if you really want to, considering the additions of Forochel, Evendim and the High Pass in the Misty Mountains.

I think it is because if you want to do the Moria stuff, you need to be 50.  Any XP bonus will help get you there.  I started playing a character and still haven't reached 50...I think I am 43 and this XP bonus will be great to get me the rest of the way.  Of course, it would help if I would stop logging into Warhammer.

I could have written that exact sentence.

Ale
587  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: question regarding craigs list on: September 22, 2008, 06:19:25 AM
What exactly is the scam? If drifter can wait until the check clears, what risk is he assuming?

I'd go for it.

Ale
588  Non-Gaming / Political / Religious Nonsense / Re: Make your VEEP predictions! on: September 21, 2008, 04:07:37 AM

Quote from: cheeba on September 21, 2008, 03:29:02 AM

Quote from: Autistic Angel on September 21, 2008, 03:23:58 AM

I don't think that treating other people as individuals and weighing their thoughts and opinions appropriately is a matter of taking the forum seriously.  That seems to me like a matter of common courtesy.
When you get your panties in a bunch over being told your panties are in a bunch, then yes, you take this forum WAY too seriously.

Big part of the problem with this forum is all the panties all bunched up.

God you're tiring.

You throw a tantrum because someone says your arguments are dumb, yet you've got no problem telling people their panties are in a bunch, or they have their head up someone's ass.

Wait, don't tell me. You were being sarcastic and I have no sense of humor. That's how it goes, right?

Ale

589  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Large Hadron Collider to Have "Practical" Spin-Offs? on: September 15, 2008, 05:26:23 AM
Wasn't Tim Berners-Lee at CERN when he created HTTP? For a nuclear research facility, they sure have had (and look to still have) a great impact on the Internet.

Ale
590  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Large Hadron Collider to Have "Practical" Spin-Offs? on: September 14, 2008, 04:53:37 PM
Thanks for the link, those are some interesting numbers. Though one of the authors links says that the highest energy collisions are very rare, it sounds like there are still large amounts of collisions with energy equal to that of the LHC. One of the things I find interesting is that the actual total energy is not that large (I read that 1 TeV is the amount of kinetic energy a flying mosquito has), but it is concentrated in such a small area that it can have monumental results. Really curious to see what the first real test tunrs up.

Ale
591  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Large Hadron Collider to Have "Practical" Spin-Offs? on: September 14, 2008, 01:53:08 AM

Quote from: Turtle on September 14, 2008, 01:10:49 AM

These kind of impacts that the LHC are doing are actually pretty common and happen from things like particles from the sun hitting planetary atmospheres.

I still don't buy that. Do you have any statistics of the energies of those collisions? The LHC experiments will recreate conditions present 10-25 seconds after the big bang. I think that's pretty darn energetic.

Code:
You just have to remember that the universe is a vast place filled with all sorts of extreme conditions by our standards.  If it was that easy to destroy a planet or solar system, it would be happening all over the place

What makes you believe it isn't?

Code:
If I recall correctly, the LHC does create tiny, tiny black holes, but so do other similar collisions in space which are common, these black holes exist for the tiniest of moment before evaporating.

Well, no one knows what it creates because it hasn't happened yet, but some speculate that that could be one of the outcomes.

Pardon my clumsy first attempt at line by line quoting.

Ale
592  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Large Hadron Collider to Have "Practical" Spin-Offs? on: September 14, 2008, 01:20:30 AM

Quote from: jersoc on September 13, 2008, 10:13:28 PM

Quote from: Alefroth on September 13, 2008, 04:54:33 PM

Quote from: jersoc on September 12, 2008, 06:46:33 PM

what they are doing at the LHC is what is happening all around us, but this time they can observe it easily. if it could create a black hole we would know by now. this stuff is stupid. yeah, lets not advance science because we can't be bothered to read a little.

I'm pretty excited for this, personally. Lots of cool stuff could be explained and maybe the string theory will turn out to be true too.

I don't follow you. What are some examples of this happening all around us? Isn't the reason it takes such an enormous amount of energy to do this because it doesn't occur normally?

Ale

well i'm not physicists, i just read a lot about it. just relying what scientists have been saying. the whole purpose is to observe and run the tests in a controled place. black holes are formed from collasping stars as far as they can tell. what they are doing isn't like that. that's quite some dense mass they'd have to do. this is just colliding atoms and observing what they form and spilt off into

I'm not a physicist, either, but I like to keep up on this stuff, too. It isn't actually just colliding atoms, it's colliding sub-atomic particles, specifically protons.. I know this seems like a fine point, but when you consider the density of protons vs. the density of atoms, it's a big difference. I'm not running around with my hands in the air saying the world is going to end, but I also don't think it's outlandish to consider that when you smash matter together at those energies, you might approach the density required to create a 'black hole'. Not necessarily a Disney type black hole, but a black hole nonetheless.

Ale
593  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Large Hadron Collider to Have "Practical" Spin-Offs? on: September 13, 2008, 07:36:05 PM
Cosmic radiation isn't an example of atoms smashing into each other. It would be low energy photons reacting with atomic particles in the atmosphere. We aren't talking photons here, though. We are talking massive protons accelerated to near the speed of light. I don't think that kind of collision is common, though I may be wrong, and hope someone can correct me. If it was, boy, wouldn't it be great to be able to harness that?

Ale
594  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Large Hadron Collider to Have "Practical" Spin-Offs? on: September 13, 2008, 04:54:33 PM

Quote from: jersoc on September 12, 2008, 06:46:33 PM

what they are doing at the LHC is what is happening all around us, but this time they can observe it easily. if it could create a black hole we would know by now. this stuff is stupid. yeah, lets not advance science because we can't be bothered to read a little.

I'm pretty excited for this, personally. Lots of cool stuff could be explained and maybe the string theory will turn out to be true too.

I don't follow you. What are some examples of this happening all around us? Isn't the reason it takes such an enormous amount of energy to do this because it doesn't occur normally?

Ale
595  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Decisions... Decisions... on: August 14, 2008, 11:51:07 PM
I haven't played CoV, but I still think LotRO is great. So much content is being added, and I don't think you'd find it much different play wise than when you played earlier.

Ale
596  Gaming / Console / PC Gaming / Re: BELIEVE...in Viva Piņata on: August 09, 2008, 07:11:48 PM

Quote from: whiteboyskim on August 05, 2008, 04:26:42 AM

Quote from: PeteRock on August 02, 2008, 04:13:33 PM

Even though many consider the Halo series to be overrated and unfortunately falling short of expectations, I really enjoyed the marketing approach and thought it was rather original and touched on human emotion more than any other video game marketing campaign I had ever seen.

I agree. I hate the Halo series and quit half way through Halo 3 recently because it sucks ass and just is not fun at all, but the marketing is brilliant. I look at the ads for it and say, "I wish I could play the game they're talking about instead of the one Bungie made." It's sort of like the trailer for Spider-Man 3 which is 19 kinds of bodacious ass-kickery. If only they had made that movie instead of a musical...

Just curious, why did you even play Halo 3 if you hate the series?

Ale
597  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: [Vanguard] How many actually play/make a guild? on: August 03, 2008, 02:17:38 PM
I have Station Access, so I still play Vanguard a little. However, it's by no means regularly, now that EQ2 has it's hooks back in me. I'm on Seradon mostly, Raz, how about you?

Ale
598  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: "Daydream Nation" by Sonic Youth - any good? on: July 27, 2008, 11:30:48 PM
Absolutely! I don't think they ever topped it.

Ale
599  Non-Gaming / Off-Topic / Re: Reliable incense online? on: July 23, 2008, 02:52:45 PM
I thought it was funny until I realized it was a joke. Come on, man. You don't need an online community to make an incense purchase. But since you asked, find a head-shop, or natural foods store, or record shop. It doesn't have to be run by Indians. Our co-op has boxes of 25 or so for about $1.79. Support local business.

Ale

600  Gaming / Multiplayer Madness (MMO or otherwise) / Re: Bioware KOTOR MMO "confirmed" on: July 18, 2008, 06:21:37 AM

Quote from: cheeba on July 18, 2008, 04:29:09 AM

Quote from: Gratch on July 17, 2008, 10:31:10 PM

Quote from: kronovan on July 17, 2008, 10:25:19 PM

BTW It's a freaking Star Wars MMO!!

Because we all know how well that worked out the first time... slywink
Star Wars Galaxies, before they ruined it, was better than WoW. It didn't have anywhere near the content nor the polish, but it was a better experience.

No, it wasn't.

Ale
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 [15] 16 17
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.202 seconds with 20 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.099s, 1q)