http://gamingtrend.com
September 02, 2014, 01:23:24 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Santorum Wants to Impose Conservative Christian Law?  (Read 301 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CeeKay
Gaming Trend Staff
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 71766


La-bibbida-bibba-dum! La-bibbida-bibba-do!


View Profile
« on: January 06, 2012, 06:30:00 PM »

http://us.cnn.com/2012/01/05/opinion/obeidallah-santorum-sharia/index.html

Quote
There are two Rick Santorums: The first one I might not agree with, but the second one truly scares me.

"Santorum One" pushes for less government regulation for corporations and shrinking the federal government. You may or may not agree with these positions, but they are both mainstream conservative fare.

Then there's "Santorum Two." This Santorum wants to impose conservative Christian law upon America. Am I being hyperbolic or overly dramatic with this statement? I wish I were, but I'm not.

Plainly put, Rick Santorum wants to convert our current legal system into one that requires our laws to be in agreement with religious law, not unlike what the Taliban want to do in Afghanistan.

Santorum is not hiding this. The only reason you may not be aware of it is because up until his recent surge in the polls, the media were ignoring him. However, "Santorum Two" was out there telling anyone who would listen.

damn, so I guess he'll be next for 'not running in 2012'.  I like the sharia comparison:

Quote
So, what type of nation might the United States be under Rick Santorum's Sharia law?

1. Rape victims would be forced to give birth to the rapist's child. Santorum has stated that his religious beliefs dictate that life begins at conception, and as a result, rape victims would be sentenced to carrying the child of the rapist for nine months.

2. Gay marriages would be annulled. Santorum recently declared that not only does he oppose gay marriages, but he supports a federal constitutional amendment that would ban them, invalidating all previous gay marriages that have legally been sanctioned by states and thus callously destroying marriages and thrusting families into chaos.

3. Santorum would ban all federal funding for birth control and would not oppose any state that wanted to pass laws making birth control illegal.

4. No porn! I'm not kidding. Santorum signed "The Marriage Vow" pledge (PDF) authored by the Family Leader organization, under which he swears to oppose pornography. I think many would agree that alone should disqualify him from being president.

no porn?  fuck Santorum!
Logged

Because I can,
also because I don't care what you want.
XBL: OriginalCeeKay
Wii U: CeeKay
Exodor
Gaming Trend Reader

Offline Offline

Posts: 481


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2012, 06:51:45 PM »

His support for banning birth control is wacky and likely to cost him - I saw a survey elsewhere that 99% of sexually active women have used birth control at some point in their lives.

He is the 1%!   retard
Logged
leo8877
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 12599



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 06, 2012, 09:25:25 PM »

It's amazing that these people are actually candidates for anything other than being shit on.
Logged
PR_GMR
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3418



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 06, 2012, 10:36:50 PM »

Quote from: leo8877 on January 06, 2012, 09:25:25 PM

It's amazing that these people are actually candidates for anything other than being shit on.

 thumbsup
Logged
corruptrelic
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3555


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2012, 01:02:52 PM »

He recently got booed at one of his Q&A's at a college for opposing gay marriage.

If someone doesn't agree with gay marriage I can respect that, but when you try to force your views on others (such as not allowing marriage between two people who love eachother regardless of sex because you are a in position of power to do so) is when I lose all respect for that person.

I remember one of the other guys saying while he doesn't personally agree with abortion, it's not his position to dictate to women what they can or can't do with their own body. That's the kind of candidate I have a tremendous amount of respect for and will be getting my vote.

Santorum is as bad as Gingrich, who is as bad as Perry, who's almost as bad as CeeKay!
Logged

"A gladiator does not fear death. He embraces it. Caresses it. Fucks it. Every time he enters the arena, he slides his cock into the mouth of the beast."
PR_GMR
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3418



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2012, 01:51:06 PM »

Quote from: corruptrelic on January 07, 2012, 01:02:52 PM

He recently got booed at one of his Q&A's at a college for opposing gay marriage.

If someone doesn't agree with gay marriage I can respect that, but when you try to force your views on others (such as not allowing marriage between two people who love eachother regardless of sex because you are a in position of power to do so) is when I lose all respect for that person.

I remember one of the other guys saying while he doesn't personally agree with abortion, it's not his position to dictate to women what they can or can't do with their own body. That's the kind of candidate I have a tremendous amount of respect for and will be getting my vote.

Santorum is as bad as Gingrich, who is as bad as Perry, who's almost as bad as CeeKay!

 thumbsup  icon_razz
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.086 seconds with 35 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.02s, 2q)