May 01, 2017, 12:24:25 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Obama uses speech to Latino group to pander for votes, says FAIR  (Read 270 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3555

View Profile
« on: June 22, 2012, 11:22:43 PM »

Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) issued the following statement in response to President Obama's speech today to the National Association of Latino Elected Officials (NALEO):

"In his speech today before NALEO, the President of the United States failed to advance the national understanding of today's immigration crisis. He continued his plan to use immigration policy as a wedge issue in his re-election campaign.

"Mr. Obama could have used the forum as an opportunity to explain the constitutionality and legality of his implementation of the DREAM Act amnesty without congressional approval. He could have explained his plan to restore the rule of law in immigration matters. He could have provided meaningful guidance for how the national government could assure the terms of immigration law are complied with, and provide a thorough-going discussion of how immigration can once again be serviceable to the national need.

"Instead, the entire amnesty discussion was a cynical effort to divide the nation along ethnic lines - to try to convince, in the most condescending manner, a Latino voting bloc that it should remain loyal to the Democratic Party because it could deliver higher level of immigration and a rolling amnesty for law breakers.

"Immigration policy debate is now deadlocked because an 'elite governing coalition' has no interest in responsible reforms - reforms that will give assurances that once again the American people, through Congress and it's enacted laws - will be the ones who decide who gets to come here. The President - in a staggering series of irresponsible statements and actions - is making it quite clear he has no interest in ensuring the nation's immigration laws are ever respected again," Stein concluded.

While the article is from today, Obama's executive order on halting deportations is a few days old. I'm on the fence about this because for Obama to bypass congress it makes you wonder what we even need a congress for? (Actually that's a good question in itself.)

"A gladiator does not fear death. He embraces it. Caresses it. Fucks it. Every time he enters the arena, he slides his cock into the mouth of the beast."
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1642

View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2012, 11:54:21 PM »

Current law gives the President a great deal of latitude regarding enforcement priorities, strategies and procedures. Obama's departmental order doesn't change the legal status of the young people it addresses. A future president could reverse this situation with the stroke of a pen and reinstitute enforcement against these individuals. A permanent solution requires Congressional action.

This is similar to the "Presidential order" proposed solution to Don't Ask Don't Tell, when it looked like Congress wasn't going to pass a repeal. Under that scenario, the President would have been ordering military authorities to prioritize *all* other military laws and regulations over DADT in terms of enforcement, to the effect of rendering DADT toothless. However, a future Republican President could have rescinded this order and undone the entire arrangement. A permanent solution required Congressional action, which finally took place before the pro-DADT Republicans took control of the House in 2011.

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 26 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.038s, 2q)