|
|
whiteboyskim
Senior Staff Writer
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 7842
Hard partier
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 25, 2006, 08:34:00 PM » |
|
Are you calling me fat?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
coopasonic
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 4018
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2006, 08:46:27 PM » |
|
The amount of extra fuel consumption blamed on weight gain since 1960 -- 938 million gallons -- would fill almost 2 million cars with gas for an entire year. However, that is only 0.7 percent of the total amount of fuel consumed by U.S. passenger vehicles each year, Jacobson said. Wow, you could save almost a whole percent! The increase in weight of the passengers is nothing compared to the increase in weight fo the cars. All that fancy safety and convenience equipment is heavy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It was this moment that took the movie from being a little ho-hum to “holy shit, did that shark just eat a plane!?”
|
|
|
Laner
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 4548
Badassfully
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: October 25, 2006, 08:51:47 PM » |
|
The amount of extra fuel consumption blamed on weight gain since 1960 -- 938 million gallons -- would fill almost 2 million cars with gas for an entire year. However, that is only 0.7 percent of the total amount of fuel consumed by U.S. passenger vehicles each year, Jacobson said. Wow, you could save almost a whole percent! The increase in weight of the passengers is nothing compared to the increase in weight fo the cars. All that fancy safety and convenience equipment is heavy. I dunno... most older cars were behemoths compared to your average coupe/sedan today (SUVs being an exception, of course)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
coopasonic
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 4018
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2006, 09:36:19 PM » |
|
The amount of extra fuel consumption blamed on weight gain since 1960 -- 938 million gallons -- would fill almost 2 million cars with gas for an entire year. However, that is only 0.7 percent of the total amount of fuel consumed by U.S. passenger vehicles each year, Jacobson said. Wow, you could save almost a whole percent! The increase in weight of the passengers is nothing compared to the increase in weight fo the cars. All that fancy safety and convenience equipment is heavy. I dunno... most older cars were behemoths compared to your average coupe/sedan today (SUVs being an exception, of course) I'll need to dig for the articles, but while it seems that way it isn't necessarily true. Todays cars are much more densely packed with "stuff".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It was this moment that took the movie from being a little ho-hum to “holy shit, did that shark just eat a plane!?”
|
|
|
coopasonic
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 4018
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 25, 2006, 09:45:14 PM » |
|
I dug and found some data to prove myself wrong... average car weight now is approximately the same as it was in 1975, it bottomed out in the early 80s and has been climbing steadily since. I couldn't find data to show what was happening before 1975.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
It was this moment that took the movie from being a little ho-hum to “holy shit, did that shark just eat a plane!?”
|
|
|
JLu
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 1308
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: October 26, 2006, 12:24:17 PM » |
|
I dug and found some data to prove myself wrong... average car weight now is approximately the same as it was in 1975, it bottomed out in the early 80s and has been climbing steadily since. I couldn't find data to show what was happening before 1975.
I believe in the study they didn't take SUVs into the equation; just cars and light trucks. I'm too lazy to re-read the article at the moment, so I'll accept that memory as reality until I reread or someone else tells me I'm wrong 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
XBox Live Gamertag: JLu
|
|
|
CeeKay
Gaming Trend Staff
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 63461
I am LEGEN- wait for it..... DARY!
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: October 26, 2006, 02:59:53 PM » |
|
Are you calling me fat?
Yes. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Because I can. XBL: OriginalCeeKay I think Ceekay is sexy!! - morlac 5-19-2013
|
|
|
ElijahPrice
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 826
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: October 26, 2006, 05:08:28 PM » |
|
I dug and found some data to prove myself wrong... average car weight now is approximately the same as it was in 1975, it bottomed out in the early 80s and has been climbing steadily since. I couldn't find data to show what was happening before 1975.
I believe in the study they didn't take SUVs into the equation; just cars and light trucks. I'm too lazy to re-read the article at the moment, so I'll accept that memory as reality until I reread or someone else tells me I'm wrong  \ haha also, i love studies like this that a) dont take into account major "reasons why" and b) report miniscule findings. =poop
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JLu
Gaming Trend Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 1308
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: October 26, 2006, 05:17:17 PM » |
|
I dug and found some data to prove myself wrong... average car weight now is approximately the same as it was in 1975, it bottomed out in the early 80s and has been climbing steadily since. I couldn't find data to show what was happening before 1975.
I believe in the study they didn't take SUVs into the equation; just cars and light trucks. I'm too lazy to re-read the article at the moment, so I'll accept that memory as reality until I reread or someone else tells me I'm wrong  \ haha also, i love studies like this that a) dont take into account major "reasons why" and b) report miniscule findings. =poop Meaning they compared the weight and driving habits of only small vehicles and small trucks and the gasoline consumption today vs. then. Of course more gas is being used because of SUVs... But more is also being used because we weigh more, and as such, similarly weighed vehicles are carrying more weight, reducing fuel economy...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
XBox Live Gamertag: JLu
|
|
|
|