Superman Returns Pictures

[naednek]

http://movies.msn.com/movies/gallery.aspx?gallery=10534

Man, he's looking quite feminine.

[Nth Power]

He looks a lot like Jason Schwartzman from Rushmore

Max Fischer or Clark Kent.  You decide.

[Daehawk]

Man, he's looking quite feminine.

Well they had to digitally edit his giant wang so what do you expect?  :lol:

[Turtle]

That girl playing Lous Lane looks about 16 in that picture, way too young.  Cute though.

[CeeKay]

Spacey's looks a bit Hackmanish here

[Rob_Merritt]

He looks a lot like Jason Schwartzman from Rushmore

Max Fischer or Clark Kent.  You decide.

Greeeat now another reason for me to hate Superman Return.

[Calvin]

I think the stills look absolutely awful, and the guy they choose for superman looks terrible, and the costume is a disaster. I really think this is going to suck. Yknow, completely uniformed opinion, but it just looks terrible.

[Rob_Merritt]

I'm right with ya Calvin. Right with you.

[Daehawk]

Hell ive been irked at it since I first saw how they changed the blue/red/yellow color scheme.

[lokiju]

I think the stills look absolutely awful, and the guy they choose for superman looks terrible, and the costume is a disaster. I really think this is going to suck. Yknow, completely uniformed opinion, but it just looks terrible.

Yeah, I don't know why they can't stick to a serious look for Supes.  This version (actor and outfit both) looks too wussy IMHO.



I mean, come on, he looks like a gay cowboy.  And everyone knows the chest 'S' is part of the material, not some rubber attachment piece.

[Knightshade Dragon]

Brokeback Superman?

[lokiju]

Brokeback Superman?

Hehe, all we need now is Batman to complete the image.

[Dafones]

I completely reserve judgement until I see what Singer does with the character as a physical entity (strange way to describe it, I know). Until I see how Supes is filmed. Until I see how he interacts with the movie's environment. Until I see his strength and speed. If Singer makes him believably superheroic, I'm on board.

Totally wait and see for me.

[Graham]

I completely reserve judgement until I see what Singer does with the character as a physical entity (strange way to describe it, I know). Until I see how Supes is filmed. Until I see how he interacts with the movie's environment. Until I see his strength and speed. If Singer makes him believably superheroic, I'm on board.

Totally wait and see for me.

I think that this is a good idea.  Remember when the initial pictures for the costumes that were going to be in the first X-Men movie were released?  They didn't look anything like what people were expecting.  Yet, once people saw the movies, they worked.

[CeeKay]

Hell ive been irked at it since I first saw how they changed the blue/red/yellow color scheme.

Hey, it worked with Robin in Batman & Robin, right?  

[Rob_Merritt]

Hell ive been irked at it since I first saw how they changed the blue/red/yellow color scheme.

Hey, it worked with Robin in Batman & Robin, right?  

In all the batman movies, including Batman Begins, WB has completely screwed up Batman's costume. Luckily the quality of some of the movies seem to be not tied to the costume.

[Kevin Grey]

Singer has a perfect track record in my opinion (well, I haven't seen 'Public Access' and don't really plan to) so I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt here and will reserve judgement until I see the movie for myself.

[Dafones]

Hell ive been irked at it since I first saw how they changed the blue/red/yellow color scheme.

Hey, it worked with Robin in Batman & Robin, right?  

In all the batman movies, including Batman Begins, WB has completely screwed up Batman's costume. Luckily the quality of some of the movies seem to be not tied to the costume.

I agree with you, Rob - I don't think Batman's costume has ever been done right cinematically. One of the reasons? We always see too much of it. The example that sticks out the most in BB? When Bats is talking to Gordon at Gordon's house. He should only be a nondescript silhouette with the faintest trace of facial features, this lurking presense that you only have the vaguest impression of.

BTW, I flipping love your current avatar, Rob.

[Calvin]

I'm right with ya Calvin. Right with you.

I mean, Brendan Fraser was there!!! He wanted it! WHY NOT? And seriously, I dont care how big this guys cock is that they had to digitally edit it. In some of the live action shots, I can actually SEE where they either have shaded the costume to make him look more muscular or digitally enhanced it. If you look at his thighs in some of the shots-well, I can tell you from looking down at my own quads that thigh separation doesn't look like that. And hey, you lose your chest somewhere superman? At least make the actor buff up to play freaking SUPERman, for the love of jebus.

[Rhinohelix]

How your quads are built is extremely dependent on how you build them.  Squats != cylcing != swimming with fins != plyometrics !=machines != etc.

In any event, he is at least 20 pounds heavier than Reeves for the role.  That was before The Austrian Oak changed how we view superheros and physiques, though.

Rhino

[-Lord Ebonstone-]

Superman Returns Pictures

Who'd he steal them from in the first place?

[lokiju]

How your quads are built is extremely dependent on how you build them.  Squats != cylcing != swimming with fins != plyometrics !=machines != etc.

In any event, he is at least 20 pounds heavier than Reeves for the role.  That was before The Austrian Oak changed how we view superheros and physiques, though.

Rhino

Well, the comics have made him out to look like Mr. Universe over the years.  I liked the way Reeves looked in the role.  I picture Supes as being built more like an averge man, and not all muscle bound. It's not his size that gives him his strength after all, but his physiology.

[Rhinohelix]

That is very true.  I guess like many things your conceptualization of Superman is very dependant upon the times which frame him.

Rhino