The more I think about it the more msteelers claim of Seer doesn't add up. Why would raven claim Seer falsely after he had been condemned? It's not like the votes could be reversed. It sounded like a burst of frustration. But then why would msteelers claim that Soulchilde is clean if he isn't the Seer? Unless the two are in cahoots together? Claim Seer when the real Seer can't contest, claim the other wolf is normal and hopefully ride that to victory?
Something doesn't add up. I'm changing my vote.
Wolf seers can pick whomsoever they want, including villagers to bolster their position. SC is a good choice to garner support (as he's been arguably the most active - a stark contrast to "Tru1cy" of old
Thing is, they only need one successful lynch. I've been thinking about this, and here's the reason I'm not going to vote msteelers:
A) With a seer role tossed into the ring yesterday, it's pretty damned ballsy for a wolf would even want to claim that role.
B) Supposing Msteelers (and we, as a village) don't believe Raven7's claim, that would mean that Msteelers would have been claiming 1 in 8, minus Raven and the night kill. The risk that there was then a third claim, from the "real seer" would then still exist.
C) Msteelers wasn`t on the chopping block, so it`s not to save his hide. Perhaps something to make the game interesting (depending on his partner).If a seer is lynched, does the result come back villager or seer?
Do the wolves get results of their night kill role?
I am of the belief that claiming hunter (knowing the rulesets, and playing acting at the shot) is just as plausible, though the 3 points above are by no means ironclad proof.
This was me trying to open discussion. the dogpile was at stess's insistence.