http://gamingtrend.com
September 02, 2014, 03:55:53 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Assassin's Creed Reviews  (Read 37641 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
depward
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 5540


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: November 13, 2007, 11:21:39 PM »

HAY guys what's going on I'm confused hold me!!!
Logged

depward on the Playstation Network
raaaaaawwwwwwr on Xbox Live
Lee
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 3270


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: November 13, 2007, 11:25:20 PM »

IGN reviewed an early beta. (I wouldn't put it past them at least.)
« Last Edit: November 13, 2007, 11:41:16 PM by Lee » Logged
Blackjack
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 10823



View Profile
« Reply #82 on: November 13, 2007, 11:29:59 PM »

Nah, Eurogamer does that.  Tongue

Gamespy's is mixed but not entirely negative:
http://xbox360.gamespy.com/xbox-360/assassins-creed/834669p1.html
Some quotes if you don't want to weed through 3 pages:
Quote
There really isn't another game quite like it. Unfortunately, there isn't another game with issues quite like Creed's, either. Assassin's Creed tries to be a stealth game, an action game, a stealth kill game and a platformer, and to innovate in each category. But for each amazing step forward, Creed takes a half-step back.

Unfortunately, this is symptomatic of Assassin's Creed; each element of the game sacrifices too much in order to squeeze other major elements in. Instead of a true stealth engine, you have awkward "hide spots" to accommodate the free roaming. Combat is either too easy or too hard, lacking the brilliance of a dedicated action title. And the free-roaming, bound as it is to mission objectives that would be fine in a more linear game, is just unsatisfying. Each element of the game is individually interesting, but as a whole the package feels incomplete and patchwork more than innovative.
Logged

Playing
PC
-Halfway (sci-fi, turn-based squad strategy)
mikeg
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2549


View Profile WWW
« Reply #83 on: November 13, 2007, 11:50:00 PM »

After watching the Gametrailers.com review my enthusiasm is all but gone.  And mainly because of one thing.  There are two moments in the video, and the reviewer discusses it, where Altair assissinates someone just feet away from another person and the other person looks down, sees the dead body, and with Altair standing directly in front of him says, 'who is responsible for this deed?'.  Jeez.  How friggin lame is that?  No amount of pretty graphics or wall climbing can forgive, what for me, is the core of the game-stealth.  At that moment I would be taken completely out of the game. That adn the fact that the enemies all stand around and take their turns in combat all but diminishes the two fundamental aspects of the game for me.

Gonna rent now.  I definitely want to see the world of AC, but my concern over the stealth mechanic and the fact that virtually EVERY reviewer I have read or watched says there is no motivation to return to the game once complete delegates this to rental-only status. 

Too bad. 
« Last Edit: November 13, 2007, 11:52:09 PM by mikeg » Logged

I am Xboxalot on Live.
kronovan
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 7919



View Profile
« Reply #84 on: November 13, 2007, 11:55:36 PM »

Quote from: Blackjack on November 13, 2007, 11:29:59 PM

Nah, Eurogamer does that.  Tongue

Gamespy's is mixed but not entirely negative:
http://xbox360.gamespy.com/xbox-360/assassins-creed/834669p1.html
Some quotes if you don't want to weed through 3 pages:
Quote
There really isn't another game quite like it. Unfortunately, there isn't another game with issues quite like Creed's, either. Assassin's Creed tries to be a stealth game, an action game, a stealth kill game and a platformer, and to innovate in each category. But for each amazing step forward, Creed takes a half-step back.

Unfortunately, this is symptomatic of Assassin's Creed; each element of the game sacrifices too much in order to squeeze other major elements in. Instead of a true stealth engine, you have awkward "hide spots" to accommodate the free roaming. Combat is either too easy or too hard, lacking the brilliance of a dedicated action title. And the free-roaming, bound as it is to mission objectives that would be fine in a more linear game, is just unsatisfying. Each element of the game is individually interesting, but as a whole the package feels incomplete and patchwork more than innovative.

My gut feeling about this game was that it was designed by committee.  No doubt a committee made up of very skilled members, but a committee none the less. IMO based upon what I've read, it seems that this game has stealth, some action, stalking and a bit of platforming solely for the purpose of covering all the different gameplay mechanic bases. When I read and watched previews, it just didn't seem that this game had a very well defined premise. At least not to the extent that Looking Glass had with the Thief series or Ubisoft Montreal had with the Splinter Cell series.

Of course I haven't even played the game yet, so I'm quite possibly just talking through my hat.
Logged
Interloper
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 600



View Profile
« Reply #85 on: November 14, 2007, 12:10:01 AM »

Quote from: mikeg on November 13, 2007, 11:50:00 PM

After watching the Gametrailers.com review my enthusiasm is all but gone.  And mainly because of one thing.  There are two moments in the video, and the reviewer discusses it, where Altair assissinates someone just feet away from another person and the other person looks down, sees the dead body, and with Altair standing directly in front of him says, 'who is responsible for this deed?'.  Jeez.  How friggin lame is that?  No amount of pretty graphics or wall climbing can forgive, what for me, is the core of the game-stealth.  At that moment I would be taken completely out of the game. That adn the fact that the enemies all stand around and take their turns in combat all but diminishes the two fundamental aspects of the game for me.

Gonna rent now.  I definitely want to see the world of AC, but my concern over the stealth mechanic and the fact that virtually EVERY reviewer I have read or watched says there is no motivation to return to the game once complete delegates this to rental-only status. 

Too bad. 

Ah crap.  I haven't seen that review yet, but that bit about killing the guy and the NPC next to ya has dirt for brains kills any interest I had.  I also wanted this game for the stealth aspect and it sounds like they borked it up.
Logged

semiconscious
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4416



View Profile
« Reply #86 on: November 14, 2007, 12:19:24 AM »

Quote from: TheMissingLink on November 13, 2007, 09:40:09 PM

From GameSpot: "PS3 owners are blessed with a slightly more solid frame rate."

IGN wrote (about the PS3 version): "The framerate is considerably worse, so much so that it begins to affect gameplay in the later levels."

What the hell?

the mainstream game review machine is broken. it's been broken for a while, actually, but it's only in the last year or so that it's become extremely obvious...

when it comes to deciding on whether or not to get a game, you're much better off reading game boards, trusting your instincts, &, if still stuck, flipping a coin...

Quote from: mikeg on November 13, 2007, 11:50:00 PM

I definitely want to see the world of AC, but my concern over the stealth mechanic and the fact that virtually EVERY reviewer I have read or watched says there is no motivation to return to the game once complete delegates this to rental-only status.

while i understand what you're saying, & realize many people feel the same way, i gotta admit, whether i'll replay/return to a game has never been a factor in deciding whether i'll get a game. am i just strange?...

Logged

"... i'm not against some 'monkey catching'... but i'd rather be collecting pants..."
- snake, 'snake vs monkey' (mgs3:se)
depward
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 5540


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: November 14, 2007, 12:22:00 AM »

Quote from: semiconscious on November 14, 2007, 12:19:24 AM

while i understand what you're saying, & realize many people feel the same way, i gotta admit, whether i'll replay/return to a game has never been a factor in deciding whether i'll get a game. am i just strange?...

Not at all.  I only replay games I really, really, REALLY enjoy...
Logged

depward on the Playstation Network
raaaaaawwwwwwr on Xbox Live
mikeg
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2549


View Profile WWW
« Reply #88 on: November 14, 2007, 12:23:06 AM »

No, you're not strange.  I am sure alot of people who COLLECT video games do the same.  I do not however.  I play them and when done, they're gone.  If the game offers me no replay whatsoever I just can't see the point in spending $65 for what an $8 rental could give me.  Pure and simple.


If the combat was God of War fun and the stealth and openendness had been as anticipated I could see me playing this 3 to 4 times like some others I have kept, but I just haven't seen evidence that this game will now have that appeal.

If I rent it and it proves to be freakin awesome to me, I will pick up for multiple replays.  
Logged

I am Xboxalot on Live.
Destructor
Special Project Group
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 15920


▲▲▼▼◄►◄►B A Start


View Profile WWW
« Reply #89 on: November 14, 2007, 12:33:01 AM »

Quote from: Caine on November 13, 2007, 09:54:05 PM

good lord, it's like the keystone cops of reviewing. 

i usually trust gamespot more than ign, but maybe it's time to rethink that. 

seriously, ron, did you guys get a review copy? 

Well, the 'big 2' both screwed up on the mono sound issue in the Wii version of Guitar Hero 3, so I frankly don't trust them anymore period. Or frankly care.

I'm still getting the game tomorrow (or at least they're expecting it then) over at Fry's for $40 (price confirmed by the employees). smile
Logged

"All opinions posted are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled."
Kevin Grey
Global Moderator
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 13976


View Profile
« Reply #90 on: November 14, 2007, 12:35:19 AM »

Quote from: tripwire on November 13, 2007, 11:19:23 PM

Quote from: KePoW on November 13, 2007, 11:04:13 PM

Quote from: tripwire on November 13, 2007, 10:07:54 PM

So far it looks like IGN and Eurogamer have the most informative reviews going.

why's that, just because they have it rated lower?  sounds pretty cynical to me

Not because they're lower, but because they go into the issues alot more, which ultimately makes me decide if it's worth my time. I always want to hear the cons, then decide if it's enough to steer me away.

Gamespot's review seems very weak to me. He doesn't go into any detail about the repetitive nature of the missions, NPC phrases, and dumb AI which is so very obvious in the vids i've watched.



Maybe because the GS reviewer didn't think they were issues?  It stands to reason that a 9.0 review is going to have fewer negatives than a 7.7 (frankly the reviewer wouldn't be doing their job otherwise). 
Logged
kronovan
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 7919



View Profile
« Reply #91 on: November 14, 2007, 12:41:31 AM »

Quote from: depward on November 14, 2007, 12:22:00 AM

Quote from: semiconscious on November 14, 2007, 12:19:24 AM

while i understand what you're saying, & realize many people feel the same way, i gotta admit, whether i'll replay/return to a game has never been a factor in deciding whether i'll get a game. am i just strange?...

Not at all.  I only replay games I really, really, REALLY enjoy...

I don't necessarily buy games based on replay value either. My reasons for buying them are: (1) It's unlikely to be available for rental in my city (as are most Wii games), (2) I won't continuously play it until completion, which will result in multiple rentals and end up costing the same as buying it (KOTOR and Elder Srolls come to mind), (3) If it's older and I buy it at bargain prices, I can trade it later and be out little more than the rental cost.

The only replay I really look for is coop, in which case I'll buy it because I can play it again with my kids, nephew or friends online. That being said it generally has to be an excellent title in order for me to want to bother playing it cooperatively. All that being said, AC will still only a best be a rental for me.
Logged
semiconscious
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4416



View Profile
« Reply #92 on: November 14, 2007, 12:42:52 AM »

Quote from: mikeg on November 14, 2007, 12:23:06 AM

No, you're not strange.  I am sure alot of people who COLLECT video games do the same.  I do not however.  I play them and when done, they're gone.  If the game offers me no replay whatsoever I just can't see the point in spending $65 for what an $8 rental could give me.  Pure and simple.

yeah,... while i don't really 'collect' games, i do like holding onto the ones i've enjoyed, on the off-chance that i just might wanna replay them sometime, & they won't be available otherwise... but, come to think of it, that probably isn't gonna really be much of a concern with ac for a little while smile ...
Logged

"... i'm not against some 'monkey catching'... but i'd rather be collecting pants..."
- snake, 'snake vs monkey' (mgs3:se)
Calvin
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 13895

President of G.R.O.S.S.


View Profile
« Reply #93 on: November 14, 2007, 12:44:48 AM »

After reading Eurogamers review and Gamespot's review (probably the two most trusted for me) to see two differing ends of the spectrum of score, I am still going to pick this up. It sounds fun, interesting, innovative, different, and atmospheric. Maybe I will get bored of it, but I will just sell it. I would rather pay 10-15 bucks (the game minus how much I get for it in sale or trade) than 8 to rent and be able to have it as long as I want or trade it or sell it or whatever, and frankly I am just intrigued to play it.
Logged
tripwire
Gaming Trend Reader

Offline Offline

Posts: 148


View Profile
« Reply #94 on: November 14, 2007, 12:51:20 AM »

Quote from: Kevin Grey on November 14, 2007, 12:35:19 AM

Quote from: tripwire on November 13, 2007, 11:19:23 PM

Quote from: KePoW on November 13, 2007, 11:04:13 PM

Quote from: tripwire on November 13, 2007, 10:07:54 PM

So far it looks like IGN and Eurogamer have the most informative reviews going.

why's that, just because they have it rated lower?  sounds pretty cynical to me

Not because they're lower, but because they go into the issues alot more, which ultimately makes me decide if it's worth my time. I always want to hear the cons, then decide if it's enough to steer me away.

Gamespot's review seems very weak to me. He doesn't go into any detail about the repetitive nature of the missions, NPC phrases, and dumb AI which is so very obvious in the vids i've watched.



Maybe because the GS reviewer didn't think they were issues?  It stands to reason that a 9.0 review is going to have fewer negatives than a 7.7 (frankly the reviewer wouldn't be doing their job otherwise). 

If the AI just stands around oblivious to everything while you kill someone next to him, or patiently waits their turn for you to kill them next in a fight, it then becomes more than a subjective opinion on whether it's an issue or not.

If the reviewer chooses that it doesn't kill the game for him/her, then at least let the readers know the issue exists.


Logged
EddieA
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 6907


View Profile
« Reply #95 on: November 14, 2007, 12:52:54 AM »

I chalk most of the disparity in reviews to the degree to which the game's problems bother the reviewer.  No game is perfect, and flaws in the game are usually pretty objective.  The degree to which you can overlook them often determines your enjoyment of the game.  With AC, there are obviously problems with the AI, which is a gamebreaker for some, whereas it won't impact my enjoyment of the game much, if at all.  I read reviews to find out a game's successes and failures, and then make up my own mind based on how much those elements matter to me.
Logged

"Why did the chicken cross the Mobius strip?  To get to the same side."  - The Big Bang Theory
JCC
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2366


View Profile
« Reply #96 on: November 14, 2007, 01:01:05 AM »

Quote from: EddieA on November 14, 2007, 12:52:54 AM

I chalk most of the disparity in reviews to the degree to which the game's problems bother the reviewer.  No game is perfect, and flaws in the game are usually pretty objective.  The degree to which you can overlook them often determines your enjoyment of the game.

I agree completely. I just watched the Game Trailers review. It really says almost everything the IGN review says (well, not the silly top 5 disappointments line). The big differences are that the GT guy clearly absolutely loved the story and the IGN guy seemed to hate it. I also think the GT reviewer is so blown away by the good in the game (as well as the new elements it introduces) that while he sees many of the same problems, they just don't matter to him as much as they clearly did the IGN reviewer.

I am torn. When the lower score reviews started popping it seemed to make my buying decision easy and I ran out and picked up Mario Galaxy (which is awesome). But now, I feel like I may just do what I shouldn't, and buy both this week. God knows my current game load is huge as it is, and money is very tight with the holiday looming, but AC just looks stunning. And damnit, the new 360 owner in me wants me to buy a freaking game for it! smile

We'll see if I break down this week and pick it up.
Logged

-John

XBox Live ID: "JCC Davros"
Kevin Grey
Global Moderator
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 13976


View Profile
« Reply #97 on: November 14, 2007, 01:18:30 AM »

Quote from: EddieA on November 14, 2007, 12:52:54 AM

I chalk most of the disparity in reviews to the degree to which the game's problems bother the reviewer.  No game is perfect, and flaws in the game are usually pretty objective.  The degree to which you can overlook them often determines your enjoyment of the game.  With AC, there are obviously problems with the AI, which is a gamebreaker for some, whereas it won't impact my enjoyment of the game much, if at all.  I read reviews to find out a game's successes and failures, and then make up my own mind based on how much those elements matter to me.

+1
Logged
Gratch
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Online Online

Posts: 12466


GO UTES!!


View Profile
« Reply #98 on: November 14, 2007, 01:19:32 AM »

Quote from: tripwire on November 14, 2007, 12:51:20 AM

Quote from: Kevin Grey on November 14, 2007, 12:35:19 AM

Quote from: tripwire on November 13, 2007, 11:19:23 PM

Quote from: KePoW on November 13, 2007, 11:04:13 PM

Quote from: tripwire on November 13, 2007, 10:07:54 PM

So far it looks like IGN and Eurogamer have the most informative reviews going.

why's that, just because they have it rated lower?  sounds pretty cynical to me

Not because they're lower, but because they go into the issues alot more, which ultimately makes me decide if it's worth my time. I always want to hear the cons, then decide if it's enough to steer me away.

Gamespot's review seems very weak to me. He doesn't go into any detail about the repetitive nature of the missions, NPC phrases, and dumb AI which is so very obvious in the vids i've watched.



Maybe because the GS reviewer didn't think they were issues?  It stands to reason that a 9.0 review is going to have fewer negatives than a 7.7 (frankly the reviewer wouldn't be doing their job otherwise). 

If the AI just stands around oblivious to everything while you kill someone next to him, or patiently waits their turn for you to kill them next in a fight, it then becomes more than a subjective opinion on whether it's an issue or not.

Some of it boils down to realism vs. enjoyment.  There seems to be a knock on most steath games for bad AI.   Is it realistic for guards to "forget" about you within 30 seconds?  No.  But would it make for a fun game to have guards relentlessly pursue you for 20 minutes?  Again, no.  There needs to be a happy medium.  It looks as if AC certainly leans more towards the 30 second extreme, which apparently bothers many people.  I personally prefer less AI to more, but that's just my personal preference.

Same thing holds true for the combat mechanic.  Seems to me that combat simply wouldn't be fun if you had half a dozen guards swarming all over you at once.  Sure it makes the waiting enemies look a bit silly, but I'd rather have an enjoyable combat mechanic with some silly visuals than a button-mashing hack fest against multiple enemies.  Again, different strokes and all that.

I'm still debating on whether I want to take the plunge this week or not.  I'm leaning towards no, but we'll see how my willpower holds out.
Logged

“My next great decision is just lying in wait.
The action might turn out to be the world's most grievous mistake."
- Bad Religion, Past is Dead
CeeKay
Gaming Trend Staff
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 71766


La-bibbida-bibba-dum! La-bibbida-bibba-do!


View Profile
« Reply #99 on: November 14, 2007, 01:36:19 AM »

so, the first mission (which also acts as a tutorial) is pretty fun.  The graphics are nice but there seems to be an oddness to them I can't quite put my finger on.  combat takes a bit getting used to, but it does indeed look like they nerfed the enemy AI so they won't swarm you  disgust  still, I had a blast climbing around the beginning level and taking out the Christians  icon_twisted
Logged

Because I can,
also because I don't care what you want.
XBL: OriginalCeeKay
Wii U: CeeKay
th'FOOL
Executive Producer and Editor-At-Large
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 5012


Never whistle while you're pissing


View Profile WWW
« Reply #100 on: November 14, 2007, 02:02:41 AM »

Quote from: rickfc on November 13, 2007, 09:52:51 PM

Quote from: warning on November 13, 2007, 09:50:50 PM

Help us Gaming Trend.  You're our only hope!

Yeah, what gives?  smile

It's called "we're reviewing a fuckton of games right now, give us a chance"  icon_eek
Logged

Mike Dunn
Executive Producer & Managing Editor, GamingTrend
Gratch
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Online Online

Posts: 12466


GO UTES!!


View Profile
« Reply #101 on: November 14, 2007, 02:21:16 AM »

Quote from: th'FOOL on November 14, 2007, 02:02:41 AM

Quote from: rickfc on November 13, 2007, 09:52:51 PM

Quote from: warning on November 13, 2007, 09:50:50 PM

Help us Gaming Trend.  You're our only hope!

Yeah, what gives?  smile

It's called "we're reviewing a fuckton of games right now, give us a chance"  icon_eek

Is fuckton more or less than a shitload?  I always get those confused.
Logged

“My next great decision is just lying in wait.
The action might turn out to be the world's most grievous mistake."
- Bad Religion, Past is Dead
JuniorDan
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1312



View Profile
« Reply #102 on: November 14, 2007, 02:30:25 AM »

Quote
IGN.com           7.7  /10            
1UP.com                    7 /10        
VicioJuegos [Spain]          96 /100        
GameTrailers                     9.1 /10        
Yahoo! Video Games        4.5 /5        
GamesRadar [UK]         100 /100        
GamePro    11/08/07     5 /5        
Game Informer    11/07/07       9.5 /10        
Game Informer    11/07/07       9.5 /10        
Famitsu 360    11/02/07    10 /10        
Famitsu 360    11/02/07    8 /10        
Famitsu 360    11/02/07    9 /10        
Famitsu 360    11/02/07    10 /10    

I am personally going with Gamespot because I have for years and IGN seem more often to be off the mark with their reviews. I like Hitman to a point I hate Splinter Cell and Metal Gear, I could not stand Prince of Persia with all of the puzzle crap. The game   like every other game out there has its ups and down. So it is not GTA and that Pretty face doll lied, when she said you can assassinate you target when and where every you want to.   According to IGN it is scripted to a particular area. Aside from that the game is going to allow me to keep busy while I am working my way up to the kill instead of sitting in the shadows time NPC movements forever just to get to the next shadow. I will be spending my $60 buck on it and if and when I get board of it I will trade it in. So far all other review look promising but as we all know "to each his own"

By the way any word on Kane and Lynch?
Logged

360 GAMERTAG:Juniordan       ‹(•¿•)›  ‹(•¿•)›  ‹(•¿•)›
Wii: 2834 4528 4246 3222 ‹(•¿•)›  ‹(•¿•)›  ‹(•¿•)›
PS3 Spinks
Kevin Grey
Global Moderator
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 13976


View Profile
« Reply #103 on: November 14, 2007, 02:37:21 AM »

Quote from: JuniorDan on November 14, 2007, 02:30:25 AM

[By the way any word on Kane and Lynch?

7ish from all three EGM reviews and similar from IGN.  The 1Up review makes it sound pretty good, just marred by some technical hiccups.  Sounds like a fun game if your expectations aren't too high and it will be going on my Christmas list. 
Logged
whiteboyskim
Senior Staff Writer
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 7848


Hard partier


View Profile
« Reply #104 on: November 14, 2007, 03:29:24 AM »

Quote from: Gratch on November 14, 2007, 02:21:16 AM

Quote from: th'FOOL on November 14, 2007, 02:02:41 AM

Quote from: rickfc on November 13, 2007, 09:52:51 PM

Quote from: warning on November 13, 2007, 09:50:50 PM

Help us Gaming Trend.  You're our only hope!

Yeah, what gives?  smile

It's called "we're reviewing a fuckton of games right now, give us a chance"  icon_eek

Is fuckton more or less than a shitload?  I always get those confused.

Fuckton > Shitload.

We're slammed with reviews right now so it's probably buried in the stack of stuff on somebody's desk and they'll get to it ASAP. We're working on it. smile
Logged

Behold the glory of my new blog!
Filmmaking is vision plus faith plus balls, all 3 of which Hollywood knows little about.
CeeKay
Gaming Trend Staff
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 71766


La-bibbida-bibba-dum! La-bibbida-bibba-do!


View Profile
« Reply #105 on: November 14, 2007, 03:45:46 AM »

what?  are you guys bothering to sleep or something?  only pussies need sleep.  are you guys pussies???????


 Tongue
Logged

Because I can,
also because I don't care what you want.
XBL: OriginalCeeKay
Wii U: CeeKay
ROTC1983
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 4414


Is it really that Kampfy?


View Profile
« Reply #106 on: November 14, 2007, 03:47:07 AM »

Quote from: CeeKay on November 14, 2007, 03:45:46 AM

what?  are you guys bothering to sleep or something?  only pussies need sleep.  are you guys pussies???????


 Tongue

 crybaby  Not sleep, work Tongue
Logged

CeeKay
Gaming Trend Staff
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 71766


La-bibbida-bibba-dum! La-bibbida-bibba-do!


View Profile
« Reply #107 on: November 14, 2007, 03:53:51 AM »

Quote from: ROTC1983 on November 14, 2007, 03:47:07 AM

Quote from: CeeKay on November 14, 2007, 03:45:46 AM

what?  are you guys bothering to sleep or something?  only pussies need sleep.  are you guys pussies???????


 Tongue

 crybaby  Not sleep, work Tongue

just tell Unkie Sammy that you need some time off to play games  icon_wink
Logged

Because I can,
also because I don't care what you want.
XBL: OriginalCeeKay
Wii U: CeeKay
th'FOOL
Executive Producer and Editor-At-Large
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 5012


Never whistle while you're pissing


View Profile WWW
« Reply #108 on: November 14, 2007, 03:59:49 AM »

Believe me, I'd rather review Assassin's Creed than 2 versions of Bee Movie... mad
Logged

Mike Dunn
Executive Producer & Managing Editor, GamingTrend
Chaz
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 5212



View Profile
« Reply #109 on: November 14, 2007, 04:00:54 AM »

I'm pretty okay with the enemies waiting and fighting one on one.  Makes combat more manageable, and reminds me of the old Errol Flynn movies.  It worked very well in Sands of Time, in that you were fighting one at a time, but you could switch from one enemy to another at will.  Took some getting used to, but led to a very fluid fighting system that I liked.

I'm also not terribly worried about the AI issue quoted.  You could find AI screwups in just about every game.  How come in every stealth game, the guards never notice that their buddies are going missing one by one?  It's entirely possible that the example given is an isolated incident.

I'm still picking it up tomorrow.  I've certainly liked enough games that the reviewers liked less than this.  If I didn't buy games that were reviewed at a 75-80 level, I never would've bought the Fatal Frame games, for example.
Logged

msduncan
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2992


Roll Tide!!!!


View Profile
« Reply #110 on: November 14, 2007, 05:31:03 AM »

Quote from: th'FOOL on November 14, 2007, 03:59:49 AM

Believe me, I'd rather review Assassin's Creed than 2 versions of Bee Movie... mad

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaah

/points

bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
EngineNo9
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 11019


I said good day, sir!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #111 on: November 14, 2007, 11:47:08 AM »

Quote from: Chaz on November 14, 2007, 04:00:54 AM

I'm still picking it up tomorrow.  I've certainly liked enough games that the reviewers liked less than this.  If I didn't buy games that were reviewed at a 75-80 level, I never would've bought the Fatal Frame games, for example.

Yeah, if this is your style of game or you really want to play it then I wouldn't let the reviews and things totally disuade you.  I've gotten more fun out of some 70-80 rated games than others that were 90+.  There's nothing wrong with that as long as you go in knowing the shortcoming and/or are willing to accept and look beyond them. 
Logged

Sandwiches do fix everything.
ATB
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 15372


Thanks for everything, Ryan. 1979-2013


View Profile
« Reply #112 on: November 14, 2007, 12:21:32 PM »

Quote from: JCC on November 13, 2007, 07:14:04 PM

IGN Video Review

No score, but they do call it "one of the 5 biggest disappointments in gaming". They recommend a rental.


I have the gift of gaming diviniation...
Logged
Knightshade Dragon
Administrator
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 21054



View Profile WWW
« Reply #113 on: November 14, 2007, 12:26:47 PM »

We are supposed to get our copy shortly - demand for the title spiked significantly.  Don't worry - I'm looking forward to reviewing it as soon as possible.
Logged

Ron Burke
EiC, Director of Gaming Trend
Gamertag:
Gaming Trend
PS3 Tag: GamingTrend
ATB
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 15372


Thanks for everything, Ryan. 1979-2013


View Profile
« Reply #114 on: November 14, 2007, 12:35:48 PM »

Hmm. Gamespot gave it a 9.0.  Now I'm totally confused.
Logged
mikeg
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2549


View Profile WWW
« Reply #115 on: November 14, 2007, 12:42:29 PM »

Me too
Logged

I am Xboxalot on Live.
Lockdown
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 5587


LD


View Profile
« Reply #116 on: November 14, 2007, 12:52:25 PM »

I am really starting to like Gametrailers' reviews.  The guy making the comments doesn't try to be all creative, or dazzle you with shit.  The last few reviews of their's I have watched have been to the point, cover important topics, and will try to sync up video with issues they found so you can see it as well.  They spend over 95% of the review showing you actual footage of gameplay so you can see it for yourself.  I think the guy made it reasonably clear that despite all the negative things he pointed out, Assassin's Creed is breaking new ground in gaming in certain areas, and hence got a higher score than it probably otherwise would have.

I appreciate a reviewer that basically says, "Look - here are the issues you are going to run into.  Decide for yourself if they are 'gamebreakers' for you."



« Last Edit: November 14, 2007, 12:54:32 PM by Lockdown » Logged

LD

"Let your enemies fear, for a harlequin of the Laughing God dances at your side."
Booner
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1193


View Profile
« Reply #117 on: November 14, 2007, 01:16:09 PM »

Quote from: Lockdown on November 14, 2007, 12:52:25 PM

I am really starting to like Gametrailers' reviews.... The last few reviews of their's I have watched have been to the point, cover important topics, and will try to sync up video with issues they found so you can see it as well.

Aye...I really like their format. The reviews are fairly long,  detailed, and they really do try to come at it as objectively as possible. Granted, I'll still take any final scores with a grain of salt, yet the reviews themselves seem to always be fair.
Logged
mikeg
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 2549


View Profile WWW
« Reply #118 on: November 14, 2007, 01:17:56 PM »

They are my favorite reviewers.  Problem is his review, and video, was the very one that pointed out how friggin brain dead the a.i. is.  That is my biggest concern with the game prior to playing it.
Logged

I am Xboxalot on Live.
Knightshade Dragon
Administrator
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 21054



View Profile WWW
« Reply #119 on: November 14, 2007, 01:31:12 PM »

I'd love to do video reviews - I'm just working on the logistics of capture that are still alluding me. 
Logged

Ron Burke
EiC, Director of Gaming Trend
Gamertag:
Gaming Trend
PS3 Tag: GamingTrend
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 14   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.186 seconds with 103 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.056s, 2q)