http://gamingtrend.com
May 25, 2015, 12:29:18 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: [Wii U] Splatoon  (Read 267 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Bullwinkle
Gaming Trend Staff
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 16007


Watch me pull a rabbit outta my hat.


View Profile
« on: May 09, 2015, 07:08:49 PM »

As impressed as I was by this during last year's E3, I haven't really been following it.  I was surprised to find out it comes out at the end of the month!

Meanwhile, Nintendo is running a kind of super-limited demo thing this weekend, calling it a Global Testfire .  I was only able to play last night for an hour last night, but I had a lot of fun.

It plays pretty smoothly.  There's something really satisfying about covering segments of the floor in paint.  It has a texture, too, which I wasn't expecting.  There seems to be a difference between covering a blank bit of floor and one already covered.  It's thicker.  I don't know that it affects gameplay at all, and maybe I'm imagining it, but it's a nice detail.

Another nice detail is that Nintendo has including a kind of Doodle Jump mini-game to play on the pad between rounds.  It's incredibly simplistic, but it's neat anyway.  Plus it saves your progress between bouts.

Unfortunately, this leads to one of the issues.  The matches themselves are three minutes long.  That in itself isn't a problem.  It actually seems to be just the right amount of time to madly try and cover as much territory as you can ("killing" enemies as you go by trapping them in your color).  However, it seems to take just as long to get into the next session.  It's probably less, but it's longer than it should be a lot shorter.  That little mini-game can only hold your interest for so long.  It's not a big enough problem to spoil the fun, but over time it'll make the game less appealing, I think.

Another issue is the weaponry.  I tried all of them, but the paint roller was the clear winner.  By the end of the hour, almost everyone was using it.
The roller covered ground a lot better and made taking out an opponent easier, too.  There are benefits to the other weapons, of course.  For example, there are walls that can be covered, and the roller only works on the ground (with a mild splash effect when you first use it).  Covering the walls allow for better squid travel (players can easily drop into squid-mode to swim in their color paint, even up walls).  Each weapon comes with it's own power-up weapon, too (gained after covering a certain amount of ground, it seems).  Some of these might be more useful than the blast cannon that comes with the roller.  But in the end, none of these benefits outweigh the power of that roller.

If this game weren't coming out so soon, I'd figure they'd have time to balance the weapons.  And maybe they will in a patch or something, but as it stands, it's problematic.

There was only one game mode in the demo, and I only got to try 2 maps.  Maybe that'll help, too.

Still, there is something so original and fun here while still being accessible, but also allowing for skilled play.  I am definitely picking it up.
Logged

That's like blaming owls because I suck at making analogies.
Lordnine
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


Lord of the Rutabagas


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2015, 04:33:27 AM »

I tried downloading this tonight and was disappointed that it was no longer available.  Looking forward to some real reviews once we get closer to release.  Most of the early buzz has been positive.
Logged
EddieA
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 7070


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2015, 10:50:53 AM »

I'm torn regarding the game.  It looks like a lot of fun (I remember spending hours and hours playing an old shareware game where you ran around trying to paint as much of the level with your color as possible) but I'm worried this won't find a player base.  An online multiplayer focused Nintendo game is an uncertain prospect to begin with, and the fact that the game is only shipping with 5 maps and 1 online mode (with the rest to be rolled out over summer) is also cause for concern.
Logged

"Why did the chicken cross the Mobius strip?  To get to the same side."  - The Big Bang Theory
HankRaptor
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1209


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2015, 01:40:58 PM »

Im interested, it looks like a novel concept. However, when I saw this was going to be 59.99 I am out. To me, it looks like a 19.99 or even 29.99 game. I wont put the hours in to warrant the cost.
Logged

Wii Number 6291 3315 9378 1013
360- HankRaptor
PSN- HankRaptor
Crispin sees what you are doing and he is NONE TOO PLEASED.
Lordnine
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


Lord of the Rutabagas


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 12, 2015, 02:51:17 PM »

Quote from: HankRaptor on May 12, 2015, 01:40:58 PM

Im interested, it looks like a novel concept. However, when I saw this was going to be 59.99 I am out. To me, it looks like a 19.99 or even 29.99 game. I wont put the hours in to warrant the cost.
If Iím not mistaken, it was originally going to be bargain priced but then Nintendo took it on to create an entire single player campaign for it.
Logged
Lordnine
Gaming Trend Senior Member

Offline Offline

Posts: 1649


Lord of the Rutabagas


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2015, 12:18:05 AM »

I played in the test-fire today.  It's definitely fun but I'm terrible at aiming with a controller and I worry that it will get old fast.  Those two things are enough to keep me away on launch day.  That said, unless reviews pan the single-player component I will definitely be checking it out further down the road though.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.142 seconds with 35 queries. (Pretty URLs adds 0.043s, 2q)